Skip to main content
Log in

Students’ perceptions of institutional practices: the case of limits of functions in college level Calculus courses

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a study of instructors’ and students’ perceptions of the knowledge to be learned about limits of functions in a college level Calculus course, taught in a North American college institution. I modeled these perceptions using a theoretical framework that combines elements of the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, developed in mathematics education, with a framework for the study of institutions developed in political science. While a model of the instructors’ perceptions could be formulated mostly in mathematical terms, a model of the students’ perceptions included an eclectic mixture of mathematical, social, cognitive, and didactic norms. I describe the models and illustrate them with examples from the empirical data on which they have been built.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first step in τ1 appears in the textbooks when strategies of calculating limits are described in general. However, this step is omitted in most worked out examples in the textbooks and in solutions written by teachers and made available to students. The same is true for Mathematical Praxeology MP2.

References

  • Artigue, M., Batanero, C., & Kent, P. (2007). Mathematics teaching and learning at post-secondary level. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1011–1050). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N. (1999). Contract and custom: two registers of didactical interactions. The Mathematics Educator, 9(2), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbé, J., Bosch, M., Espinoza, L., & Gascón, J. (2005). Didactic restrictions on the teacher’s practice: The case of limits of functions in Spanish high schools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 235–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, M., Chevallard, Y., & Gascón, J. (2005). ‘Science or Magic?’ The use of models and theories in didactics of mathematics. 4th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Sant Feliu de Guixols, Spain, February 17–21, 2005. (http://cerme4.crm.es/Papers%20definitius/11/Bosch%20Chevall.pdf).

  • Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (1992). Fundamental concepts in didactics: Perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. In R. Douady & A. Mercier (Eds.), Research in didactique of mathematics. Selected papers (pp. 131–167). Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (2002). Organiser l’étude. 1. Structures et fonctions. In J.-L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11e Ecole d’Eté de Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 3–22). Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Jourmal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(2), 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (1997). Observing mathematical problem solving through task-based interviews. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph 9, 289–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, I. (2008). Abstraction and consolidation of the limit procept by means of instructional schemes: The complementary role of three different frameworks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, M. (2004). Epistemological messages conveyed by three college mathematics textbooks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A., Bobos, G., & Knipping, Ch. (2008). Source of students’ frustration in pre-university level, prerequisite mathematics courses. Instructional Science, 36, 289–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning. Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Hardy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardy, N. Students’ perceptions of institutional practices: the case of limits of functions in college level Calculus courses. Educ Stud Math 72, 341–358 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9199-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9199-8

Keywords

Navigation