Abstract
This paper investigates the nature of the interaction between the teacher and students as they worked on different mathematics activities in a single classroom over a 10-month period. Sociocultural theories and the Vygotskian zone of proximal development provide the main framework for examining the teaching and learning processes and explaining the incorporation of a four-phase lesson plan as increasing participation of the teacher and students in the teaching and learning process. Drawing on the analyses of discourse from videotaped lessons and the interviews with the teacher and students, five different types of interactions that emphasized mathematical sense-making and justification of ideas and arguments were identified. Excerpts from transcriptions of such interactions are provided to illustrate the learning practices, either academic or non-academic, that students developed in response to these interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cobb, P., & Whitenack, W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom video-recordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 213–228. doi:10.1007/BF00304566.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative of the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2–33. doi:10.2307/749161.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design. London: Sage.
Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3, 331–343. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(84)90006-6.
Forman, E. A. (2003). A sociocultural approach to mathematics reform: Speaking, inscribing and doing mathematics within communities of practice. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 333–352). Reston: NCTM.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258–291.
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education.
Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in everyday context (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. Proceedings of the Eleventh International conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, Montreal, 3–27.
Martin, J. (1985). Reclaiming a conversation: The ideal of the educated woman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 236–266. doi:10.2307/749827.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Richards, J. (1991). Mathematical discussions. In E. von Glaserfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 13–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641–649.
Schwartz, J. L. (1994). The role of research in reforming mathematics education: A different approach, Chapter 1. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Searle, D. (1984). Scaffolding: Who’s building whose building? Language Arts, 61(5), 480–483.
Sfard, A., Forman, E. A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Learning discourse: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 1–11. doi:10.1023/A:1014097416157.
Sternberg, R. (1994). Answering questions and questioning answers: Guiding children to intellectual excellence. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(2), 136–138.
Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In C. A. Stone, N. Minick & E. A. Forman (Eds.), Context for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children development (pp. 169–183). New York: University Press.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lau, P.NK., Singh, P. & Hwa, TY. Constructing mathematics in an interactive classroom context. Educ Stud Math 72, 307–324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9196-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9196-y