Skip to main content
Log in

The role of contextual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in activating mathematical competencies (PISA)

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses the difficulties which Spanish student teachers have in solving the PISA 2003 released items. It studies the role played by the type and organisation of mathematical knowledge in the activation of competencies identified by PISA with particular attention to the function of contextual knowledge. The results of the research lead us to conclude that the assessment of the participant’s mathematical competencies must include an assessment of the extent to which they have school mathematical knowledge (contextual, conceptual and procedural) that can be productively applied to problem situations. In this way, the school knowledge variable becomes a variable associated with the PISA competence variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2001). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). A critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: the importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347–366. doi:10.1080/09243450600697242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/.

  • Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of mean, median and mode. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 37–63. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: the case of mathematics (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • INECSE (2005). PISA 2003. Pruebas de Matemáticas y de Solución de Problemas. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Christofidou, E. (2002). Generating criteria for measuring teacher effectiveness through a self-evaluation approach: a complementary way of measuring teacher effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 501–529. doi:10.1076/sesi.11.4.501.3560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2007). Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 349–371. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9071-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movshovitz-Hadar, N., Zaslavsky, O., & Inbar, S. (1987). An empirical classification model for errors in high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 3–14. doi:10.2307/749532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P. (1986). Are mathematical understanding and algorithmic performance related? For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework. mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. París: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: first results from PISA 2003. París: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesek, D. D., & Kirshner, D. (2000). Interference of instrumental instruction in the subsequent relational learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 524–540. doi:10.2307/749885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. past, present and future (pp. 461–494). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radatz, H. (1980). Students’ errors in the mathematical learning process: a survey. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, L. (2006). Marco teórico de evaluación en PISA sobre matemáticas y resolución de problemas. Revista de Educación, extraordinario 2006, pp. 275–294

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Designing knowledge scaffolds to support mathematical problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 313–349. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2303_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz, C. (2007). La competencia matemática (en el sentido PISA) de los futuros maestros. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 25(3), 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of the teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 151–184. doi:10.1007/BF00972261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to César Sáenz.

Additional information

This paper is based on a research project funded by a grant awarded in 2003 by the General Directorate for Research of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (BSO-2003-7133).

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sáenz, C. The role of contextual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in activating mathematical competencies (PISA). Educ Stud Math 71, 123–143 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9167-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9167-8

Keywords

Navigation