Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When Intuition Beats Logic: Prospective Teachers’ Awareness of their Same Sides – Same Angles Solutions

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper indicates that prospective teachers’ familiarity with theoretical models of students’ ways of thinking may contribute to their mathematical subject matter knowledge. This study introduces the intuitive rules theory to address the intuitive, same sides-same angles solutions that prospective teachers of secondary school mathematics come up with, and the proficiency they acquired during the course “Psychological aspects of mathematics education”. The paper illustrates how drawing participants’ attention to their own erroneous applications of same sides-same angles ideas to hexagons, challenged and developed their mathematical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Education Council: 1991, A National Statement on Mathematics for Australian Schools: Curriculum Corporation, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D.L.: 1991, ‘Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject-matter knowledge part of the equation’, in J. Brophy (ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, vol. II, JAI Press, London, pp. 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D.L.: 1999, ‘Concluding remarks’, Knowing and Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Proceedings of a workshop at the National Academy of Science with the support of the National Science Foundation, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C.: 1999, ‘Case materials’, Knowing and Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Proceedings of a workshop at the National Academy of Science with the support of the National Science Foundation, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.I. and Walter, M.I. (eds.): 1983, The Art of Problem Posing, The Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 31–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P., Franke, M.L. and Levi, L.: 2003, Thinking Mathematically: Integrating Arithmetic and Algebra in Elementary School, New Hampshire, USA.

  • Clement, J.: 1993, ‘Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30, 1241–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, T.J.: 1994, ‘Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation’, in D.B. Aichele and A.F. Coxford (eds.), Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics, NCTM, Reston, VA, pp. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, T.J.: 1999, ‘Conceptualizing teachers’ ways of knowing’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 38, 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, T.J. and Wiegel, H.G.: 2003, ‘Examining the mathematics in mathematics teacher education’, in A. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and F.K.S. Leung (eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 795–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, Y., Levin, I. and Siegler, R.S.: 1997, ‘A comparison of the geometric reasoning of students attending Israeli ultra-orthodox and mainstream schools’, Developmental Psychology 33, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Even, R.: 1999, ‘Integrating academic and practical knowledge in a teacher leaders’ development program’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 38, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Even, R. and Tirosh, D.: 1995, ‘Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject-matter’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feibel, W.: 1993, “‘What-if-not?” A technique for involving and motivating students in psychology courses’, in S.I. Brown and M.I. Walter (eds.), Problem Posing: Reflection and Applications, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findell, B. and Ball, D.L.: 1999, ‘Video as a delivery mechanism’, Knowing and Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Proceedings of a workshop at the National Academy of Science with the support of the National Science Foundation, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E.: 1987, Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An Educational Approach, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E.: 1993a, ‘The interaction between the formal, the algorithmic and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity’, in R. Biehler, R.W. Scholz, R. Straesser and B. Winkelmann (eds.), Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E.: 1993b, ‘The theory of figural concepts’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 24(2), 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, A.O.: 1999, ‘Forms of knowing mathematics: What preservice teachers should learn’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 38, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. and Tall, D.: 1994, ‘Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic’, The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. and Gellert, U.: 2003, ‘Educating new mathematics teachers: Integrating theory and practice, and the roles of practicing teachers’, in A. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and F.K.S. Leung (eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 829–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, I. and Bershadsky, I.: 2003, ‘Problom posing via “What if not?” strategy in solid geometry–A case study’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 22, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.Y.: 1999, ‘Student curriculum materials: Japanese teachers’ manual’, Knowing and Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Proceedings of a workshop at the National Academy of Science with the support of the National Science Foundation, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S.: 2002, ‘Situating research on mathematics teachers’ beliefs and on change’, in G.C. Leder and E. Pehkonen (eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education?, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N. and Stiles, K.E.: 1998, Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics, Corwin, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. and Spence, M.: 1999, ‘Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to-act in the moment’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 38, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R.: 1998, ‘Preservice teachers’ understanding of perimeter and area’, School Science and Mathematics 98(7), 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]: 2000, Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, NCTM, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N.: 1992, ‘Professionalization and mathematics teaching’, in D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, M.: 1999, ‘Student curriculum materials: Investigation in number, data, and space’, Knowing and Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Proceedings of a workshop at the National Academy of Science with the support of the National Science Foundation, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, K.S.: 1997, ‘Area and perimeter: Prospective teachers’ confusion’, School Science and Mathematics 97(2), 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1985, Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1987, ‘A brief and biased history of problem solving’, in F.R. Curcio (ed.), Teaching and Learning: A Problem-Solving Focus, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, Virginia, pp. 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1992, ‘Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics’, in D. Grouws (ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics, Macmillan, New York, pp. 334–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S.: 1986, ‘Those who understand: Knowledge growth with teaching’, Educational Researcher 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R.R.: 1971, The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R.R.: 1979, Intelligence, Learning, and Action: A Foundation for Theory and Practice in Education, J. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R. and Tirosh, D.: 2000, How Students’ (Mis-)Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M.: 1983, Teaching Decimal Place Value — A Comparative Study of Conflict and Positive Only Approaches, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall. D.: 2005, ‘A theory of mathematical growth through embodiment, symbolism and proof’. Plenary Lecture for the International Colloquium on Mathematical Learning from Early Childhood to Adulthood, 5–7 July, Belgium.

  • 1Tall, D. and Vinner, S.: 1981, ‘Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D.: 2000, ‘Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of childrenɳs conceptions: The case of division of fractions’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D. and Stavy, R.: 1999, ‘Intuitive (USE THE CORRECT TYPE OF APOSTROPHE) rules: A way to explain and predict students’ reasoningɳ, Educational Studies in Mathematics 38, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., Stavy, R. and Cohen, S.: 1998, ‘Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules’, International Journal of Science Education 20, 1257–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., Stavy, R. and Tsamir, P.: 2001, ‘Using the intuitive rules theory as a basis for educating teachers’, in F.L. Lin and T. Cooney (eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P.: 2002, ‘The intuitive rule “same A-same B“: The case of triangles and quadrilaterals’, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 24(4), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P.: 2003a, ‘Different representations in instruction of vertical angles’, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 25(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P.: 2003b, ‘From “easy” to “difficult” or vice versa: The case of infinite sets’, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 25(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P.: 2003c, ‘Basing instruction on theory and research: What is the impact of an extreme case?’, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 25(4), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P. and Mandel, N.: 2000, ‘The intuitive rule same A — same B: The case of area and perimeter’, in T. Nakahara and M. Koyama (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. IV, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 225–232.

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Stavy, R. and Ronen, I.: 2001, ‘Intuitive rules: A theory and its implications to mathematics and science teacher education’, in H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gruber, M. Komorek, A. Kross and P. Reiska, (eds.) Research in Science Education – Past, Present and Future, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S.: 1997, ‘The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 34, 97–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (ed.): 1994, ‘Conceptual change’, Special issue of Learning and Instruction, Vol. 4.

  • Vosniadou, S.: 2002, ‘Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning’, in G.M. Sinatra and P.R. Pintrich (eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R.: 1999, ‘Intuitive rules in number theory: Example of “The more of A, the more of B’ rule implementation”, Educational Studies in Mathematics 40(2), 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsamir, P. When Intuition Beats Logic: Prospective Teachers’ Awareness of their Same Sides – Same Angles Solutions. Educ Stud Math 65, 255–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9053-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9053-1

Keywords

Navigation