Skip to main content
Log in

Getting at the Mathematics: Sara’s Journal

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss issues in planning and conducting research into mathematics learning. We emphasize two central themes: (a) the learners’ mathematics (especially the issues and ideas, in given problem situations, that learners choose to think about and to present) and (b) the kinds of knowledge that learners may be building (including their ideas about what mathematics is, and how people do, learn, use, communicate and understand it). While the first theme is at least partly mathematical, the second interweaves cognition and epistemology. Anchored in student data from an extended classroom teaching experiment in the mathematics of change, we focus on key choices needed to build narratives to help researchers capture, in detail, how students engage with mathematics in extended problem explorations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brousseau, G.: 1997, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland and V. Warfield, trans.), Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  • diSessa, A. and Sherin, B.L.: 2000, ‘Meta-representation: An introduction’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, W.: 2000, ‘Means for meaning’, in P. Cobb, E. Yackel and K. McClain (eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 99–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Maher, C. and Martino, A.: 1996, ‘Brandon’s proof and isomorphism’, in C. A. Maher, Can teachers help children make convincing arguments? A glimpse into the process, Universidade Santa Úrsula, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, B.L.: 2000, ‘How students invent representations of motion: A genetic account’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speiser, B. and Walter, C.: 2004, ‘Placenticeras: Evolution of a task’. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(3), to appear.

  • Speiser, R. and Walter, C.: 1997, ‘Performing algebra: Emergent discourse in a fifth-grade classroom’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speiser, R. and Walter, C.: 2000, Five Women Build a Number System, Ablex, Stamford, CT.

  • Speiser, R., Walter, C. and Maher, C.: 2003, ‘Representing motion: An experiment in learning’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.: 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Taylor, P.D.: 1992, Calculus, the Analysis of Functions. Wall and Emerson, Toronto.

  • Thompson D.A.: 1942, On Growth and Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Speiser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speiser, B., Walter, C. & Glaze, T. Getting at the Mathematics: Sara’s Journal. Educ Stud Math 58, 189–207 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-1525-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-1525-1

Key Words

Navigation