Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Abstract Vocabulary Development: Embodied Theory and Practice

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the embodied theoretical basis for the meaningful learning of abstract vocabulary and reviews selected educational programs that are theoretically based and have both success and promise for abstract vocabulary development. Abstract vocabulary is a mainstay of academic vocabulary, but its nature and educational development are not well understood. From the perspective of embodied cognition and neuropsychology, the meaning and development of abstract words are based on nonverbal sensory, sensorimotor, and affective evocations as elaborated by verbal contextual associations both abstract and concrete. Developmental psychometric studies suggest a mutual relationship between nonverbal reasoning and increasingly abstract vocabulary that is a basis of the developing intellect. Although abstract vocabulary is typically learned through exposure to rich oral language and wide reading, direct instruction is also vital for many students. Educational interventions consistent with this nonverbal-verbal embodied theoretical account have been shown to be effective in learning academic vocabulary in general and abstract vocabulary in particular. However, more research is needed in both theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2010). Words worth teaching: Closing the vocabulary gap. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.

  • Binder, J. R., Desai, H. R., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. I. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2022). Abstract concepts: External influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues. Psychological Research, 86, 2370–2388.

  • Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., Colagè, I., Silipo, F., & D’Ambrosio, P. (2019). The concreteness of abstract language: An ancient issue and a new perspective. Brain Structure and Function, 224, 1385–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, & Madigan (1968) norms. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, A. M. B., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Nooijer, J. A., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Zwaan, R. (2013). Effects of imitating gestures during encoding and during retrieval of novel verbs on children’s test performance. Acta Psychologica, 144, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Maschio, N. D., Fedeli, D., Garofalo, G., & Buccino, G. (2022). Evidence for the concreteness of abstract language: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Brain Sciences, 12, 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Catts, H. (2015). The influence of reading on vocabulary growth: A case for a Matthew effect. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58, 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, K. A., Lawrence, B., & Seifert, D. (2021). Semantic reasoning: Building vocabulary with critical reading skills. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 6, 1374–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, C., Zannino, G. D., Orsoni, M., Carlesimo, G. A., Benassi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). Articulatory suppression delays processing of abstract words: The role of inner speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 1343–1354.

  • Ford-Connors, E., & Paratore, J. R. (2015). Vocabulary instruction in fifth grade and beyond: Sources of word learning and productive contexts for development. Review of Educational Research, 85, 50–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1, 23–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What is memory for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48, 905–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. L., Japutnich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. T., Sadoski, M., Stricker, A. G., White, T. S., & Wang, Z. (2007). The role of imagery in the production of written definitions. Reading Psychology, 28, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. F., August, D., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2012). Teaching vocabulary to English language learners. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. F., Baumann, J. F., Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Manyak, P., Bates, A., Cieply, C., Davis, J. R., & Von Gunten, H. (2013). Words, words everywhere, but which ones do we teach? Reading Teacher, 67, 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, S., Kievit, R. A., & Norbury, C. (2022). Mutualistic coupling of vocabulary and non-verbal reasoning in children with and without language disorder. Developmental Science, 25, e13208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, E. B., & Mendez, K. Z. (2021). A systematic review of word selection in early childhood vocabulary instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, E. B., Dickinson, D. K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Nesbitt, K. T. (2015). Examining the acquisition of vocabulary knowledge depth among preschool students. Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, E. A., de Nooijer, J., van Gog, T., & Bekkering, H. (2016). Optimizing word learning via links to perceptual and motoric experience. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa, S. I. (1949). Language in thought and action. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

  • Hayakawa, S., van den Bartolotti, J., Berg, A., & Marian, V. (2020). Language difficulty and prior learning influence foreign vocabulary acquisition. Languages, 5, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., Castaneda, R., & Spichtig, A. (2019). An analysis of the features of words that influence vocabulary difficulty. Education Sciences, 9, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, P. (2016). The meaning of “life” and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10, 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, P., McClelland, J. L., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2018). Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125, 293–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H. M., & Nassaji, H. (2014). Lexical inferencing strategies: The case of successful versus less successful inferencers. System, 45, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (2001). Vocabulary and general intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1109–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Levine, S. Z. (2019). Extending psychometric network analysis: Evidence against g in favor of mutualism? Intelligence, 73, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. J., McDonald, S. D., Greindling, L. M., Van Uitert, V. J., & Kunemund, R. L. (2022). Comparing two established multimedia approaches for teaching vocabulary to students with and without disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 532–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kievit, R. A., Lindenberger, U., Goodyer, I. M., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., Bullmore, E. T., the Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network, & Dolan, R. J. (2017). Mutualistic coupling between vocabulary and reasoning supports cognitive development during late adolescence and early adulthood. Psychological Science, 28, 1419–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kievit, R. A., Hofman, A. D., & Nation, K. (2019). Mutualistic coupling between vocabulary and reasoning in young children: A replication and extension of the study by Kievit et al. (2017). Psychological Science, 30, 1245–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Del Campo, E., Vinson, D. P., & Andrews, M. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louwerse, M. M. (2018). Knowing the meaning of a word by the linguistic and perceptual company it keeps. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10, 573–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. (2021). Build vocabulary storage and knowledge with definition work and semantic reasoning lessons. In K. Ganske (Ed.). Mindful of words: Spelling and vocabulary explorations, Grades 4–8 (2nd ed., pp. 49–56). New York, NY: Guilford.

  • Lawrence, B., & Seifert, D. (2016). Test of semantic reasoning. Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., & Hunt, R. R. (1989). A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 710–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Fulk, J. M. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2018). Abstract, emotional, and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PeerJ, 6, e5987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan, J. L. (2019). The inefficiency of vocabulary instruction. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11, 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, S., Hu, X., Kuo, L.-J., Jouhar, M., Xu, Z., & Lee, S. (2018). Vocabulary Instruction: A critical analysis of theories, research, and practice. Education Sciences, 8, 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahavandi, Z., Tabatabaee-Yazdi, M., & Samir, A. (2020). Verbal and non-verbal fluid intelligence as predictors of vocabulary knowledge. Journal of English Language Research, 1, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., Hegel, S. L., Sohlberg, M. M., & Schwarz, I. E. (1999). Defining abstract entities: Development in pre-adolescents, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2010). Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, abstractness, and emotion: A critical review of Kousta et al. 2011. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2014). Intelligence, dual coding theory, and the brain. Intelligence, 47, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., & Sadoski, M. (2010). Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: Commentary on Elman (2009) from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cognitive Science, 35, 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., Walsh, M., & Bons, T. (1994). Concreteness effects in memory: When and why? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1196–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. D., MacGregor, L. J., & Havelka, J. (2013). Concreteness effects in single-meaning, multi-meaning, and newly acquired words. Brain Research, 1538, 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P., Wang, T., Wang, C., & Lin, X. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of task, age, and socio-economic status. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 189–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzuti, L., Dawe, J., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Does mastering abstract words decline with age? Educational Gerontology, 47, 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planchuelo, C., Buades-Sitjar, F., Hinojosa, J. A., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2022). The nature of word associations in sentence contexts. Experimental Psychology, 69, 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental Science, 2(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2020). The role of emotion in learning novel abstract concepts. Developmental Psychology, 56, 1855–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 24, 1635–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadha, A. M. H., & Mahdi, H. S. (2019). The use of images for teaching abstract words vs. concrete words: A semiotic study. Arab World English Journal, 10, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggin, L. D., Muraki, E. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Development of abstract word knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 686478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A., & Paivio, A. (1968). Cognitive and emotional determinants of speech. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, I., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., & Viana, F. (2016). Beyond word recognition, fluency, and vocabulary: The influence of reasoning on reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Dual coding vs. relational processing in memory for concrete and abstract words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M. (2018). Reading comprehension is embodied. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Krasny, K. A. (2019). Dual coding theory: An embodied theory of literacy. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, M. Sailors, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Literacy (7th ed., pp. 161–177). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., Kealy, W. A., Goetz, E. T., & Paivio, A. (1997). Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 518–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., Stricker, A. G., & Burdenski, T. K., Jr. (2003). New findings for concreteness and imagery effects in written composition. Reading and Writing, 16, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M. M., Heim, S., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2013). Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete sentences. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Stahl, S. A., & McFalls, E. L. (1997). Partial word knowledge and vocabulary growth during reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 531–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). How logical reasoning mediates the relation between lexical quality and reading comprehension. Reading & Writing, 29, 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H. S. (2010). Imagery and verbal coding approaches in Chinese vocabulary instruction. Language Teaching Research, 14, 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R., & Hines, S. (2009). The effects of multimedia-enhanced instruction on the vocabulary of English language learners and non-English-language learners in pre-kindergarten through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suffill, E., Schonberg, C., Vlach, H. A., & Lupyan, G. (2022). Children’s knowledge of superordinate words predicts subsequent inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 221, 105449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. S., Francis, W. S., Borunda-Vazquez, & Carbajal, J. (2019). Mechanisms of word concreteness effects in explicit memory: Does context availability play a role? Memory & Cognition, 47, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S., Vinson, D., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2013). The representations of abstract words: What matters? A reply to Paivio’s (2013) comment on Kousta et al. (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 288–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D., Foltz, S., Kupfer, S., & Glenberg, A. (2022). Embodied action scaffolds dialogic reading. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1459–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanzek, J. (2014). Building word knowledge: Opportunities for direct vocabulary instruction in general education for students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 30, 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welcome, S. E., Paivio, A., McRae, K., & Joanise, M. F. (2011). An electrophysiological study of task demands on concreteness effects: Evidence for dual coding theory. Journal of Experimental Brain Research, 212, 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, B., Keitel, A., Bruce, G., Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2018). Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1064–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, E. (2019). Abstraction and concepts: When, how, where, what and why? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34, 1257–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Marc Brysbaert and two anonymous reviewers for their encouragement and assistance with this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Mark Sadoski

  2. Really Great Reading Company, Cabin John, MD, 20818, USA

    Beth Lawrence

Authors
  1. Mark Sadoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beth Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Sadoski.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Topical Collection on Human Movement and Learning.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadoski, M., Lawrence, B. Abstract Vocabulary Development: Embodied Theory and Practice. Educ Psychol Rev 35, 84 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09802-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09802-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation