Which Technique is most Effective for Learning Declarative Concepts—Provided Examples, Generated Examples, or Both?
- 848 Downloads
Students in many courses are commonly expected to learn declarative concepts, which are abstract concepts denoted by key terms with short definitions that can be applied to a variety of scenarios as reported by Rawson et al. (Educational Psychology Review 27:483–504, 2015). Given that declarative concepts are common and foundational in many courses, an important question arises: What are the most effective techniques for learning declarative concepts? The current research competitively evaluated the effectiveness of various example-based learning techniques for learning declarative concepts, with respect to both long-term learning and efficiency during study. In experiment 1, students at a large, Midwestern university were asked to learn 10 declarative concepts in social psychology by studying provided examples (instances of concepts that are provided to students illustrate how the concept can be applied), generating examples (instances of concepts that the student generates on his or her own to practice applying the concept), or by receiving a combination of alternating provided examples and generated examples. Two days later, students completed final tests (an example classification test and a definition cued recall test). Experiment 2 replicated and extended findings from experiment 1. The extension group was a variation of the combination group, in which participants were simultaneously presented with a provided example while generating an example. In both experiments, long-term learning and study efficiency were greater following the study of provided examples relative to the other example-based learning techniques.
KeywordsDeclarative concepts Example-based learning Provided examples Generated examples
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Blaisman, R. N., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (in press). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behavior. Memory.Google Scholar
- Cantrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1147–1156.Google Scholar
- Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. New York: NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Gurung, R. A. R., Weidert, J., & Jeske, A. (2010). Focusing on how students study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 28–35.Google Scholar
- Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: a model-comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
- Murphy, G. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, Y. Lawrence, J. S., Tran, N., Frye, A. A. (2013). How and how much do students really study? Tracking study habits with the diary method. Poster presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society; Nov. 14–17; Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar