Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unemployment of Non-Western Immigrants in the Great Recession

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines whether unemployment of non-western immigrant workers in the Netherlands was disproportionally affected by the Great Recession. We analyze unemployment data covering the period November 2007–February 2013 finding that the Great Recession affected unemployment rates of non-western immigrant workers in absolute terms more than unemployment rates of native workers. However, in relative terms there is not much of a difference. We also find that the sensitivity of individual job finding rates to the aggregate state of the labor market does not differ between natives and non-western immigrants. In combination our findings suggest that the Great Recession did not have a different impact on the unemployment of non-westerns immigrants and native Dutch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an overview of recent developments in the Dutch labor market see Van Ours (2012).

  2. Note that the national unemployment rate is based on a definition that takes the hours of work into account. If an individual works less than 12 h per week but would like to work more than 12 h per week this individual is considered to be unemployed. In our dataset we do not make such a distinction according to hours of work.

    Table 1 Unemployment; linear probability estimates
  3. The cyclical effect for western immigrants is about the same as for native workers. For workers with an unknown immigrant status the cyclical effect is smallest. This may have to do with the fact that workers with an unknown immigrant status are observed only in the first years of the sample when unemployment rate did not vary so much.

  4. The LR-test statistic is equal to 3.8, while the critical \(\chi ^2\) value with 2 degrees of freedom is equal to 6.0.

References

  • Algan, Y., Dustmann, C., Glitz, A., & Manning, A. (2010). The economic situation of first and second-generation immigrants in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 120, F4–F30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin, A., Patacchini, E., Verdier, T., & Zenou, Y. (2011). Ethnic identity and labour market outcomes of immigrants in Europe. Economic Policy, 26, 57–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., & van Ours, J. C. (2013). The economics of imperfect labor markets (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, K. (2006). The effects of age at arrival and enclave schools on the academic performance of immigrant children. Economics of Education Review, 25, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damm, A. (2009). Ethnic enclaves and immigrant labor market outcomes: Quasi-experimental evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 281–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Glitz, A., & Vogel, T. (2010). Employment, wages, and the economic cycle: Differences between immigrants and natives. European Economic Review, 54, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., & Glitz, A. (2011). Migration and education. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4, pp. 327–439). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Frattini, T., & Lanzara, G. (2012). Educational achievement of second generation immigrants: An international comparison. Economic Policy, 69, 143–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, P., Fredriksson, P., & Aslund, O. (2003). Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 329–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) International migration outlook. Paris: OECD.

  • Ohinata, A., & van Ours, J. C. (2012). Young immigrant children and their educational attainment. Economics Letters, 116, 288–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C., & Veenman, J. (2005). The Netherlands: Old emigrants-young immigrant country. In K. Zimmermann (Ed.), European migration: What do we know? (pp. 173–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C., & Veenman, J. (2006). Age at immigration and educational attainment of young immigrants. Economics Letters, 90, 310–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C. (2012). The dutch labour market: Great recession—small impact. CESifo DICE Report, 10(2), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C., & Veenman, J. (2003). The educational attainment of second-generation immigrants in the Netherlands. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 739–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C., & Veenman, J. (2004). From parent to child: Early labor market experiences of second-generation immigrants in the Netherlands. De Economist, 152, 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan C. van Ours.

Additional information

The authors thank Rob Alessie for useful comments.

Appendix: Information on the LISS Data

Appendix: Information on the LISS Data

1.1 Definition of Variables

  • Non-western immigrant: Dummy variable if an individual is a non-western immigrant (first generation or second generation); reference group: natives. For some individuals the immigrant status is unknown. Western immigrants are from a country in Europe (excl. Turkey), North America, Oceania, Indonesia or Japan. Immigrants with a non-western foreign background are from Turkey or countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia, with the exception of Indonesia and Japan. In some estimates additional dummy variables for western immigrants and workers with an unknown immigrant status are included.

  • Education: Dummy variables for intermediate vocational, higher vocational and university education; reference group: less than intermediate vocational education.

  • Children: Dummy variables if the individual has 1 child, or 2 or more children; reference group: no children.

  • Men: Dummy variable if an individual is a man; reference group: women.

  • Urbanization: Dummy variables based on population density (per \(\hbox {km}^2\)) of the place of residence of an individual: very urban (1,500–2,000), moderately urban (1,000–1,500), slightly urban (500–1,000), not urban (less than 500); reference group: extremely urban (2,500 or more).

  • Unemployment rate: Monthly unemployment rate at the national level.

  • A person was considered to be employed if one of the following answers was selected: paid employment, works or assists in family business, autonomous professional, freelancer, or self-employed.

  • The following situations were treated as state of unemployment: job seeker following job loss, first-time job seeker, exempted from job seeking following job loss, performs unpaid work while retaining unemployment benefit, or performs voluntary work.

1.2 Descriptive Statistics

The top part of Table 4 lists descriptive statistics of the LISS panel for the analysis of the monthly data. In total we have 429,243 monthly observations of 12,090 individuals. In this sample 7 % of the observations are on non-western immigrants, 57 % on natives, 8 % on western immigrants and 28 % of individuals with an other including unknown immigrant status. The mean age of the individuals is 42.6, while 53 % of them are males. On average 8 % of the person-month observations refer to an unemployment spell. The average national unemployment rate of the sample period was 5.3 %.

Table 4 Descriptive statistics

The bottom part of Table 4 shows descriptive statistics of the dataset used in the duration analysis. We observe information about 1134 unemployment durations that started during the sample period. Of these unemployment spells, 12 % referred to non-western immigrants and 60 % to natives. This part of the table also provides information on the distribution of the sample over educational categories, presence of children, age categories and urbanization categories. The average length of the unemployment spell was 9.6 months, while 54 % of the spells ended because a job was found. Half of the sample consists of unemployment durations of males.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cerveny, J., van Ours, J.C. Unemployment of Non-Western Immigrants in the Great Recession. De Economist 161, 463–480 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-013-9216-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-013-9216-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation