Skip to main content
Log in

Retail Payments in the Netherlands: Facts and Theory

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Over the last decade, the Netherlands observed a rapid shift from cash and paper-based payment instruments toward electronic payment instruments. Banks are well aware that transaction pricing can speed up the shift to low-cost electronic payments. But payment pricing is a complex matter, due to strong network externalities. Recent theory on two-sided markets has led to a better understanding of the payment industry, in terms of optimal payment pricing and payment network competition. Under two-sidedness, it is shown that payment pricing is not just a question of choosing the right price level but rather of choosing the right price structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong M. (2004), ‘Competition in Two-sided Markets’. Mimeo, University College London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter W.F. (1983), ‘Bank Interchange of Transactional Paper: Legal Perspectives.’ Journal of Law and Economics 26, 541–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belgium National Bank (2005), Costs, Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Payment Methods, Belgium National Bank.

  • Boeschoten W.C. (1998), ‘Cash Demand, Payment Patterns and the Demand for Money’. De Economist, 146, 117–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeschoten W.C., Fase M.M.G. (1989), ‘The Way We Pay with Money’. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeschoten W.C., Fase M.M.G. (1992), ‘The Demand for Large Banknotes’. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 24, 319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt W., D. Humphrey and Uittenbogaard R. (2005), ‘The Effect of Transaction Pricing on the Adoption of Electronic Payments: A Cross-country Comparison,’ DNB Working Paper no. 71, De Nederlandsche Bank NV.

  • Bolt W. and Tieman A.F. (2003), Pricing Payment Services: An IO Approach, Working Paper no. 202, International Monetary Fund.

  • Bolt W. and Tieman A.F. (2005), ‘Social Welfare and Cost Recovery in Two-sided Markets,’ Review of Network Economics, forthcoming.

  • Brits J.H. and C.C.A. Winder (2005), Payments are No Free Lunch, DNB Occasional Study no. 3(2), De Nederlandsche Bank NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Evans D. (2003), ‘The Antitrust Economics of Multi-sided Platform Markets’. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20, 325–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans D. and Schmalensee R. (1999), Paying with Plastic: The Digital Revolution in Paying and Borrowing, MIT Press.

  • Fase M.M.G. and Boeschoten W.C. (1985), The Distribution of Payments and the Use of Banknotes, DNB Quarterly Bulletin no. 3, 43–53, De Nederlandsche Bank NV.

  • Hancock D., Humphrey D. (1998), ‘Payment Transactions, Instruments, and Systems: a Survey’. Journal of Banking & Finance 21, 1573–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hove L. (2004), ‘Cost-based Pricing of Payment Instruments: The State of the Debate’. De Economist, 152, 79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey D., Kim M., Vale B. (2001), ‘Realizing the Gains from Electronic Payments’. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33, 216–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey D., Pulley L., Vessala J. (2000), ‘The Check’s in the Mail: Why the United States Lags in the Adoption of Cost-saving Electronic Payments’. Journal of Financial Services Research, 17, 17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz M., Hermalin B. (2004), ‘Sender or Receiver: Who Should pay to Exchange an Electronic Message?’. RAND Journal of Economics, 35, 423–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieviet R. (2002), ‘De betaalmarkt werkt, maar het kan beter’. Bank- en Effectenbedrijf, pp. 24–29.

  • Rochet J.C. (2003), ‘The Theory of Interchange Fees: A Synthesis of Recent Contributions’. Review of Network Economics, 2, 97–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2002), ‘Cooperation Among Competitors: The Economics of Payment Card Associations’. Rand Journal of Economics, 33, 549–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2003), ‘Platform Competition in Two-sided Markets’. Journal of Economic Association, 1, 990–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2005), ‘Two-sided Markets: A Progress Report’. Mimeo, IDEI, Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R. (2002), ‘Payments Systems and Interchange Fees’. Journal of Industrial , 50, 103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellink Report (2002), Tariff Structure and Infrastructures in Dutch Retail Payments, De Nederlandsche Bank NV, http://www.dnb.nl.

  • Wright J. (2004), ‘One-sided Logic in Two-sided Markets’. Review of Network Economics, 3, 44–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilko Bolt.

Additional information

The author would like to thank Lex Hoogduin, Rein Kieviet, Carlo Winder and two anonymous referees for critical comments and valuable remarks. Obviously, the usual disclaimer applies. Views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of De Nederlandsche Bank or the European System of Central Banks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolt, W. Retail Payments in the Netherlands: Facts and Theory. De Economist 154, 345–372 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-9014-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-9014-1

Keywords

JEL Code(s)

Navigation