Abstract
There is now a global consensus on the imperative need for energy transition and sustainability. Green innovation has emerged as a key driver to achieve these goals, and governments have recognized the importance of facilitating it. Within this context, we offer a unique perspective by examining the impact of political promotion incentives on green innovation among executives of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), shedding light on the government’s role in fostering energy transition and sustainable practices. Our findings demonstrate that governments can effectively foster a commitment to green innovation among SOE executives by integrating green indicators into the criteria used for political promotions. Notably, we find that this positive influence is more prominent when the likelihood of political promotion is higher. We provide valuable recommendations for policymakers seeking to facilitate energy transition and drive sustainable development, particularly for economies with a substantial SOE presence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Peng Wu, upon reasonable request.
Notes
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2007-02/01/content_514710.htm.
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-05/05/content_2857363.htm.
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2015-09/21/content_2936327.htm.
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-08/06/content_355833.htm.
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-05/05/content_2857363.htm.
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2015-09/21/content_2936327.htm.
See more details at http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2013-02/01/content_2324949.htm.
References
Aghion P, Akcigit U, Bergeaud A et al (2019) Innovation and top income inequality. Rev Econ Stud 86:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy027
Akcigit U, Baslandze S, Stantcheva S (2016) Taxation and the international mobility of inventors. American Economic Review 106:2930–2981. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150237
Arena C, Michelon G, Trojanowski G (2018) Big egos can be green: a study of CEO hubris and environmental innovation: CEO hubris and environmental innovation. Br J Manag 29:316–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12250
Bai C-E, Lu J, Tao Z (2006) The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: empirical evidence from China. Am Eco Review 96:353–357. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806777212125
Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez-Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg Manag J 34:891–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2041
Bruton GD, Peng MW, Ahlstrom D et al (2015) State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Acad Manag Perspect 29:92–114. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0069
Cao X, Lemmon M, Pan X et al (2019) Political promotion, CEO incentives, and the relationship between pay and performance. Manage Sci 65:2947–2965. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2966
Chang EC, Wong SML (2009) Governance with multiple objectives: evidence from top executive turnover in China. J Corp Finan 15:230–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.10.003
Chen D, Kim J-B, Li OZ, Liang S (2018) China’s closed pyramidal managerial labor market and the stock price crash risk. Account Rev 93:105–131. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51867
Chen Y, Wang SS, Li W et al (2015) Institutional environment, firm ownership, and IPO first-day returns: evidence from China. J Corp Finan 32:150–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.03.002
Cheng B, Li Z, Qiu B, Xiong T (2023) Does collective decision-making promote SOEs’ green innovation ? evidence from China. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05495-w
Chishti MZ, Sinha A, Zaman U, Shahzad U (2023) Exploring the dynamic connectedness among energy transition and its drivers: understanding the moderating role of global geopolitical risk. Energy Econ 119:106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106570
Dangelico RM, Pujari D (2010) Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics 95:471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0
Deng X, Li W, Ren X (2023a) More sustainable, more productive: evidence from ESG ratings and total factor productivity among listed Chinese firms. Financ Res Lett 51:103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103439
Deng Y, Dong K, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Xue J (2023b) How does environmental regulation affect the double dividend for energy firms? evidence from China’s EPT policy. Econ Anal Policy 79:807–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.07.001
Ding Y, Su X (2008) Implementation of IFRS in a regulated market. J Acc Public Policy 27:474–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.005
Dong K, Shahbaz M, Zhao J (2022) How do pollution fees affect environmental quality in China? Energy Policy 160:112695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112695
Du G, Yu M, Sun C, Han Z (2021) Green innovation effect of emission trading policy on pilot areas and neighboring areas: an analysis based on the spatial econometric model. Energy Policy 156:112431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112431
Fisman R, Shi J, Wang Y, Xu R (2018) Social ties and favoritism in Chinese science. J Polit Econ 126:1134–1171. https://doi.org/10.1086/697086
Flammer C (2021) Corporate green bonds. J Financ Econ 142:499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
Ford JA, Steen J, Verreynne M-L (2014) How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis. J Clean Prod 84:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.062
Gollop FM, Roberts MJ (1983) Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. J Polit Econ 91:654–674
Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (2003) Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 46:384–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00031-7
Groves T, Hong Y, McMillan J, Naughton B (1995) China’s evolving managerial labor market. J Polit Econ 103:873–892. https://doi.org/10.1086/262006
He F, Yan Y, Hao J, Wu J, (George), (2022) Retail investor attention and corporate green innovation: evidence from China. Energy Economics 115:106308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106308
He X, Jiang S (2019) Does gender diversity matter for green innovation? Bus Strateg Environ 28:1341–1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2319
Hojnik J, Ruzzier M (2016) What drives eco-innovation? a review of an emerging literature. Environ Innov Soc Trans 19:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006
Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 37:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
Hu D, Qiu L, She M, Wang Y (2021a) Sustaining the sustainable development: how do firms turn government green subsidies into financial performance through green innovation? Bus Strateg Environ 30:2271–2292. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2746
Hu D, Wang Y, Huang J, Huang H (2017) How do different innovation forms mediate the relationship between environmental regulation and performance? J Clean Prod 161:466–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.152
Hu G, Wang X, Wang Y (2021b) Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics 98:105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
Hu J, Pan X, Huang Q (2020) Quantity or quality? the impacts of environmental regulation on firms’ innovation–Quasi-natural experiment based on China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 158:120122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120122
Hu Y, Li W, Zhang A (2023) Political promotion incentives and firm risk: evidence from state-owned enterprises in China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 59:156–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2095899
Huang H, Mbanyele W, Wang F et al (2022) Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 184:122007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122007
Huang J-W, Li Y-H (2017) Green innovation and performance: the view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. J Bus Ethics 145:309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y
Jia R, Kudamatsu M, Seim D (2015) Political selection in China: the complementary roles of connections and performance. J Eur Econ Assoc 13:631–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12124
Kammerer D (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Ecol Econ 68:2285–2295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.016
Kong G, Kong D, Lu R (2020) Political promotion incentives and within-firm pay gap: Evidence from China. J Account Public Policy 39:106715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106715
Kong G, Zhang H, Wang D et al (2021) Political promotion and pay gap: evidence from SOEs in China. Econ Anal Policy 69:450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.023
Li D, Huang M, Ren S et al (2018) Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: evidence from CDP China 100. J Bus Ethics 150:1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3187-6
Li H, Meng L, Wang Q, Zhou L-A (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance: evidence from Chinese private firms. J Dev Econ 87:283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001
Li H, Meng L, Zhang J (2006) Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? evidence from China. Econ Inq 44:559–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbj031
Li H, Zhou L-A (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. J Public Econ 89:1743–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
Li Y, Ren X, Meng S (2023) The performance of companies under environmental regulation stress: a perspective from idiosyncratic risk. Appl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2289924
Li Y, Ren X, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2023b) Vulnerability of sustainable markets to fossil energy shocks. Resour Policy 85:103879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103879
Li Y, Wong CWY, Miao X (2022) Political connection, political promotion and corporate environmental information disclosure in China. Chin Manag Stud 16:78–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2020-0233
Lindberg MB, Markard J, Andersen AD (2019) Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: a study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Res Policy 48:103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
Lou X, Qian A, Zhang C (2021) Do CEO’s political promotion incentives influence the value of cash holdings: evidence from state-owned enterprises in China. Pac Basin Financ J 68:101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101617
Martin X, Seo H, Yang J et al (2023) Earnings performance targets in annual incentive plans and management earnings guidance. Account Rev 98:289–319. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2018-0532
Oh W-Y, Chang YK, Cheng Z (2016) When CEO career horizon problems matter for corporate social responsibility: The moderating roles of industry-level discretion and blockholder ownership. J Bus Ethics 133:279–291
Peng H, Shen N, Ying H, Wang Q (2021) Can environmental regulation directly promote green innovation behavior?—— based on situation of industrial agglomeration. J Clean Prod 314:128044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128044
Phung G, Trinh HH, Nguyen TH, Trinh VQ (2022) Top-management compensation and environmental innovation strategy. Bus Strateg Environ 32:1634–1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3209
Piotroski JD, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2015) Political incentives to suppress negative information: evidence from Chinese listed firms. J Account Res 53:405–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12071
Piotroski JD, Zhang T (2014) Politicians and the IPO decision: the impact of impending political promotions on IPO activity in China. J Financ Econ 111:111–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.012
Qi G, Zeng S, Chiming T et al (2013) Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.283
Qi X, Guo Y, Guo P et al (2022) Do subsidies and R&D investment boost energy transition performance? evidence from Chinese renewable energy firms. Energy Policy 164:112909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112909
Quan X, Ke Y, Qian Y, Zhang Y (2023) CEO foreign experience and green innovation: evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 182:535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04977-z
Ren X, Cao Y, Liu PJ, Han D (2023a) Does geopolitical risk affect firms’ idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from China. Int Rev Financ Anal 90:102843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102843
Ren X, Zeng G, Sun X (2023b) The peer effect of digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Econ Model 128:106515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106515
Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32:319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
Shao S, Hu Z, Cao J et al (2020) Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: a review. Bus Strateg Environ 29:1465–1478. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2446
Shen C, Li S, Wang X, Liao Z (2020) The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 254:120122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120122
Shu C, Zhou KZ, Xiao Y, Gao S (2016) How green management influences product innovation in China: the role of institutional benefits. J Bus Ethics 133:471–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2401-7
Stucki T, Woerter M, Arvanitis S et al (2018) How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: a differentiated perspective. Energy Policy 114:245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.049
Tawiah V, Zakari A, Wang Y (2022) Partisan political connections, ethnic tribalism, and firm performance. Rev Quant Financ Acc 58:1331–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-01026-8
Tawiah VK, Barnes EJ, Zakari A (2019) Does aid effectiveness differ per political ideologies? Int Econ J 33:270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2019.1609063
Tosi HL, Katz JP, Gomez-Mejia LR (1997) Disaggregating the agency contract: the effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making. Acad Manag J 40:584–602. https://doi.org/10.2307/257054
Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L, Davia MA (2013) Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol Econ 92:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
Wagner M (2007) On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res Policy 36:1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004
Wang Q, Wong TJ, Xia L (2008) State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: evidence from China. J Account Econ 46:112–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.001
Wang Q-J, Wang H-J, Chang C-P (2022) Environmental performance, green finance and green innovation: What’s the long-run relationships among variables? Energy Economics 110:106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106004
Wang R, Wijen F, Heugens PPMAR (2018) Government’s green grip: multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strateg Manag J 39:403–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2714
Wang W, Wang D, Ni W, Zhang C (2020) The impact of carbon emissions trading on the directed technical change in China. J Clean Prod 272:122891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122891
Wang X, Chu X, Lee C-C (2023) How does anti-corruption policy affect the sensitivity of green innovation to executive incentives? Econ Chang Restruct 56:79–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09413-4
Wu J, Liu B, Zeng Y, Luo H (2022) Good for the firm, good for the society? causal evidence of the impact of equity incentives on a firm’s green investment. Int Rev Econ Financ 77:435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.10.013
Xie X, Huo J, Zou H (2019) Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: a content analysis method. J Bus Res 101:697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
Yuan B, Xiang Q (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 176:895–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.034
Zakari A, Tawiah V, Oyewo B, Alvarado R (2023) The impact of corruption on green innovation: the case of OECD and non-OECD countries. J Environ Planning Manage 66:1336–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2027234
Zhang D, Guo Y, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2023) Green finance and energy transition to achieve net-zero emission target. Energy Economics 126:106936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106936
Zhang J, Liang G, Feng T et al (2020) Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: how external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? Bus Strateg Environ 29:39–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2349
Zheng M, Feng G-F, Jang C-L, Chang C-P (2021) Terrorism and green innovation in renewable energy. Energy Econ 104:105695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105695
Zhou M, Govindan K, Xie X, Yan L (2021) How to drive green innovation in China’s mining enterprises? under the perspective of environmental legitimacy and green absorptive capacity. Resour Policy 72:102038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102038
Funding
This study was funded by the National Social Science Fund of China under grant [20BGL092].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YG: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing–Original draft preparation; PW: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition; LG: Writing–Reviewing and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gu, Y., Wu, P. & Gao, L. Does the political promotion incentive of state-owned enterprise executives facilitate green innovation?. Econ Change Restruct 57, 82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09671-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09671-4