Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How does central enterprise reform promote total factor productivity of defense firms in China?

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 2017, the reform of central state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China has had a profound impact on the operations and development of military-industrial enterprises. To study the influence of SOE reform on the total factor productivity (TFP) of China's state-owned military-industrial listed enterprises, this study uses a difference-in-differences model to conduct empirical tests. Its sample consists of relevant data from 115 military-industrial listed enterprises from 2011 to 2021. The results show that SOE reform has effectively improved the TFP of state-owned military-industrial listed enterprises. Furthermore, through heterogeneity testing, it was found that government subsidies weakened the impact of SOE reform on the TFP of military-industrial enterprises. Stock incentives had a greater impact on TFP than mergers and acquisitions. In similar conditions, motivating employees was more conducive to improving operational efficiency. The mechanism by which SOE reform affects the TFP of military-industrial enterprises is reflected in decreased agency costs and improving governance efficiency. The empirical results confirm the positive role of SOE reform and have certain enlightening significance for how to implement a scientific and reasonable subsidy system as well as how to design more effective reform measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amit BC, Arindam M (2017) Can commercialization through partial disinvestment improve the performance of state-owned enterprises? The case of Indian SOEs under reforms. J Gen Manag 43(1):5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz D, Ma H, Nishioka S (2017) Recasting the iron rice bowl: the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises. Rev Econ Stat 99(4):735–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernini C, Pellegrini G (2011) How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Reg Sci Urban Econ 3:253–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozec R, Zéghal D, Boujenoui A (2004) The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms. Aust J Public Adm 63(2):79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale R (2022) State-owned enterprises’ reforms and their implications for the resilience and vulnerability of the Chinese economy: evidence from the banking, energy and telecom sectors. Netw Spat Econ 22:489–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo D (2018) State, monopoly and bribery. Market reforms and corruption in a swedish state-owned entreprise. Econ Sociol 11(2):64–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L (2018) Natural monopoly and mixed ownership reform-based on natural experiment and cost function analysis method. China Econ 13(05):62–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Ghoul SE, Guedhami O, Wang H (2017) Do state and foreign ownership affect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations. J Corp Finan 42:408–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhu R, Song Z, Yan D (2018) Research of the impact of financial reform on total factor productivity-based on the empirical data of 5 national financial reform test areas. Chin J Manag Sci 26(9):19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen TH (2009) Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 20(4):239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu EX (2001) Beyond the property rights approach: welfare policy and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. Dev Chang 32(1):129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X (2019) Reform of state-owned enterprises and productivity growth in China. Asian-Pacific Econ Lit 33(1):64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Kalirajan KP (1998) Enterprise reform and technical efficiency of China’s state-owned enterprises. Appl Econ 30(5):585–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson G, Su J (2006) Privatization and restructuring in China: evidence from shareholding ownership: 1995–2001. J Comp Econ 34(2):146–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao C, Chen Y (2018) R&D subsidy, rent-seeking and up-grading of total factor productivity. Stat Res 35(12):80–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju J (2019) The role of state-owned enterprises’ reform and development in the construction of modern economic system. China Econ Transit (CET) 2(2):40–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkonis L, Merkliopas S, Kyga K (2016) Impact of the corporate governance reform on the management effectiveness of state-owned enterprises in Lithuania in 2012–2014. Ekonomika (vilnius University) 95(2):158–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):317–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Jin Z, Xie Y (2022) Research on the influence of ESOP on enterprise total factor productivity. Chin J Manag 19(05):758–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Xu, Li X, Wang Z (2023) Can mixed-ownership reform of state-owned enterprises restrain excessive perquisite consumption by executives. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 59(3):641–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Wang D, Zhu L, Zhao J (2022) Equity reform and high-quality development of state-owned enterprises: evidence from China in the new era. Front Psychol 26(13):913672

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y (2021) State-owned enterprise reform in China: the new structural economics perspective. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 58:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu K (2021) China’s state-owned enterprise reform since 2013. Eur J East Asian Stud 20(2):367–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Gao Y (2015) The abnormal cash dividends, agency costs and company`s value: empirical evidence of chinese listed companies. Nankai Bus Rev 18(1):152–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Zhao W (2023) The influence of state-owned enterprise reform on enterprise innovation: new evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett 30(16):2174–2178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Lian Y (2012) Estimation of total factor productivity of industrial enterprises in China: 1999–2007. China Economic Quarterly 11(2):541–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo H, Wu X, Wu Y (2022) Mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and R&D investment. Math Probl Eng 8:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma R (2011) Research on the efficiency of state-owned enterprises in China. Shanghai Journal of Economics 2:20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon RD (1994) State-owned enterprise reform through performance contracts: the Bolivian experiment. World Dev 22(6):925–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar M (2017) Revitalizing China’s economy by improved corporate governance and state-owned enterprise reforms. J Int Econ Commer Policy 8(3):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellis J (2005) The Evolution of Enterprise Reform in Africa: From State-owned Enterprises to Private Participation in Infrastructure--and Back? Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working Papers 117

  • Olley S, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter M (2003) The politics of economic restructuring in Vietnam: the case of state-owned enterprise “reform.” Contemp Southeast Asia A J Int Strat Aff 25(1):20–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2012) A survey of corporate government. J Financ 52(2):737–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Chu X, Liu X (2022) Urban wage inequality: The reform of state-owned enterprises in China’s great transition. Econ Polit Stud 10(4):442–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan C, Puchniak D, Varonil U (2015) State-owned enterprises in Singapore: historical insights into a potential model for reform. Columbia J Asian Law 28(2):61–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Gong J, Zhai Z (2022) The effect of job displacement on labor market outcomes: evidence from the Chinese state-owned enterprise reform. China Econ Rev 72:101743

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Song H (2019) Sino-US trade war, the principle of competitive neutrality and the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises. Transnat Corporat Rev 11(4):298–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Yue H, Zhang X (2019) Research on the relationship between corporate governance structure and corporate performance- a perspective based on corporate total factor productivity. Shanghai J Econ 4:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Wang H, Wu J (2021) Mixed ownership reform and corporate tax avoidance: evidence of Chinese listed firms. Pac Basin Financ J 69:101648

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Yu J (2017) Government subsidy and firms’ total factor productivity: a comparative analysis of emerging industry and traditional manufacturing industry. Ind Econ Res 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Ling X, Wang Z, Xu Y (2023) Can Mixed-ownership reform boost the digital transformation of state-owned enterprises? Economic Analysis and Policy 79:647–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Xie H (2023) Do private strategic investors improve capital allocation efficiency of SOEs? Evidence from China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 59(1):129–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef SM (1996) Structural reform programme of Egyptian state-owned enterprises. J Manag Dev 15(5):88–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Wang F, Wang Q (2023a) Does the mixed-ownership reform improve the productivity of state-owned enterprises? Evidence from companies listed in Chinese stock. Ann Public Cooper Econ 94(4):1299–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Zhang W, Chen Fu, Guo B (2023b) Does the mixed-ownership reform of Chinese state-owned enterprises improves their total factor productivity? Pac Basin Financ J 82:102182

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Q, Lin R, Luo W (2023) Fault tolerance for corporate innovation: evidence from the reform of state-owned enterprises. Front Bus Res China 17(1):126–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Strategic Economy Interdisciplinarity of Beijing Universities Advanced Disciplines Initiative (GJJ2019163).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Defense Economics and Management, Central University of Finance and Economics, No.39 of South Xueyuan Road, Beijing, China

    Huaijia Zhu & Bo Chen

  2. Department of Industrial Economy, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China

    Huaiqi Zhu

Authors
  1. Huaijia Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huaiqi Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaijia Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Chen, B. & Zhu, H. How does central enterprise reform promote total factor productivity of defense firms in China?. Econ Change Restruct 57, 54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09643-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09643-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation