Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does trade shape educational decisions? The role of initial schooling

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I study the effect that international trade has on educational decisions over half-century using a panel model. Initial schooling alters the impact of trade on educational attainment. Instrumental variables estimates suggest that the effect of trade on educational attainment is increasing in countries’ initial schooling. For countries with initial schooling of 13 years, a 10 percentage point increase in trade increases schooling year by 0.32 percent. The corresponding estimate is 2.4 percent reduction in schooling year for countries with initial schooling of 6 years. I also investigate the fertility rate for both adolescent and older women as one mechanism that relates trade to educational decisions. The contribution leverages an exogenous source of variation to instrument trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Asia’s trade share includes South Asia, which reduces the overall average.

  2. Primary school enrolment rates in the MENA region are 93 percent (85 percent for female and 101 percent for male); secondary school enrolment rates are 59 percent (53 percent for female and 65 percent for male); tertiary enrolment rates are 19 percent (18 percent for female and 21 percent for male). Primary school enrolment rates in LAC are 113 percent (112 percent for female and 115 percent for male); secondary school enrolment rates are 75 percent (77 percent for female and 73 percent for male); tertiary enrolment rates are 25 percent (26 percent for female and 23 percent for male). Primary school enrolment rates in SSA are 81 percent (75 percent for female and 87 percent for male); secondary school enrolment rates are 27 percent (24 percent for female and 30 percent for male); tertiary enrolment rates are 4 percent (3 percent for female and 5 percent for male). Primary school enrolment rates for Transition economies are 98 percent (98 percent for female and 99 percent for male); secondary school enrolment rates are 90 percent (90 percent for female and 90 percent for male); tertiary enrolment rates are 35 percent (40 percent for female and 40 percent for male). Primary school enrolment rates in Asia are 107 percent (104 percent for female and 111 percent for male); secondary school enrolment rates are 56 percent (55 percent for female and 60 percent for male); tertiary enrolment rates are 14 percent (15 percent for female and 15 percent for male).

  3. The idea here is consistent with Romer’s (1990) Noble Prize idea of “Endogenous Technological Change” whereby the starting point for countries to generate sustainable economic growth turns on the stock of human capital, which feeds into a virtuous circle of accumulated knowledge and stronger economic prosperity.

  4. Heckman (2006) provides a cogent exposition of why initial knowledge incentivised future learning: (1) early learning confers value on acquired skills, which leads to self-reinforcing motivation to learn more; (2) early mastery of a range of cognitive, social, and emotional competencies makes learning at later ages more efficient and therefore easier and more likely to continue.

  5. There is theoretically a competing reason why the average U.K’s household may not likely self-select into the labour market: the U.K’s household also has a higher baseline income, so they can absorb the cost associated with more schooling. The placebo exercise in Table 13 of the Appendix supports the role of initial education.

  6. Countries that received large remittance inflows, remittances exert strong influence on the impact that trade has on government consumption (Williams 2021a, b).

  7. The Barro and Lee (2013) education data ended 2015. I use interpolated data up to 2021.

  8. I used the 2SLS IV estimation rather than the GMM for several reasons. First, the superiority of the 2SLS IV method is that it uses external instruments to isolate the exogenous variation of the endogenous variable, while the GMM uses internal instruments (lags). In other words, the GMM uses lags (internal) of the endogenous variable as instruments. Using internal instruments are problematic because, by construction, lags of the endogenous variables are correlated with the endogenous variables themselves and thus lags of the endogenous variables will also be endogenous to the outcome variable. Second, there are three sources of endogeneity—reverse causality, measurement errors, and omitted variables—and the 2SLS IV estimation resolves all three, while the GMM estimation addresses only reverse causality using internal instruments. Third, the GMM estimation can suffer from instrument proliferation and thus bias the estimates. For these reasons, I used the 2SLS IV estimation to address endogeneity concerns.

  9. Stock and Yogo (2005) recommended F-statistic above 10, below which instruments are considered weak.

  10. I thank an anonymous referee for suggesting this exercise.

  11. Men have stronger preference for more children than women (Bankole 1995; Bankole and Singh 1998; Westoff 2010; Field et al. 2016; Doepke and Tertilt 2018).

  12. Doepke et al. (2022) suggest three additional reasons why one should expect women to combine a career with large families: “greater contributions from fathers in providing childcare; social norms in favour of working mothers; and flexible labour markets.”.

  13. See also Williams (2021a, b) who show that national income mediates the link between trade and government size.

References

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth. J Econ Growth 3:111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof GA, Kraton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart J Econ 115:715–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin D (2016) Endogenous skill acquisition and export manufacturing in Mexico. Am Econ Rev 106:2046–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankole A (1995) Desired fertility and fertility behaviour among the Yoruba of Nigeria: a study of couple preferences and subsequent fertility. Popul Stud 49:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankole A, Singh S (1998) Couples’ fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the man’s voice. Int Fam Plan Perspect 24:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Lee JW (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard E, Olney WW (2017) Globalization and human capital investment: export composition drives educational attainment. J Int Econ 106:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Perotti R (2002) An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quart J Econ 117(4):1329–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner M (2013) On the simultaneity problem in the aid growth debate. J Econometr 28:126–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner M, Lederman D (2018) Inequality and economic growth: the role of initial income. J Econ Growth 23:341–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burda M, Hamermesh DS, Weil P (2013) Total work and gender: facts and possible explanations. J Popul Econ 26:239–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelman T, Ngai RL (2021) Home production, women’s market work, and structural transformation. Working paper. London School of Economics, London

  • Doepke M, Tertilt M (2018) Women’s empowerment, the gender gap in desired fertility, and fertility outcomes in developing countries. Am Econ Assoc Papers Proc 108:358–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Doepke M, Hannusch A, Kindermann F, Tertilt M (2022) The economics of fertility: a new era. Working paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

  • Dollar D (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985. Econ Dev Cult Change 40:523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N, Topalova P (2009) Child labor and schooling in a globalizing world: some evidence from urban India. J Eur Econ Assoc 7:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds EV, Pavcnik N, Topalova P (2010) Trade adjustment and human capital investments: evidence from Indian tariff reform. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2:42–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S (1993) Openness, trade liberalization, and growth in developing countries. J Econ Lit 31:1358–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatás A, Mihov I (2003) The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion. Quart J Econ 118:1419–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field E, Molitor V, Schoonbroodt A, Tertilt M (2016) Gender gaps in completed Fertility. J Demogr Econ 82:167–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R, Kierzkowski H (1983) International trade and human capital: a simple general equilibrium model. J Polit Econ 90:957–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O, Mountford A (2008) Trading population for productivity: theory and evidence. Rev Econ Stud 75:1143–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glewwe P, Muralidharan K (2016) Improving education outcomes in developing countries: evidence, knowledge gaps, and policy implications. In: Hanushek EA, Machin S, Woesssmann L (eds) Handbook of the economics of education, 5th vol. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 653–743

  • Greenland A, Lopresti J (2016) Import exposure and human capital adjustment: evidence from the U.S. J Int Econ 47:946–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Kimko D (2000) Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. Am Econ Rev 90:1184–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Woessmann L (2006) Does education tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Econ J 116:C63–C76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Woessmann L (2012) Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. J Econ Growth 17:267–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA, Newey WK, Taylor William E (1987) Efficient estimation and identification of simultaneous equation models with covariance restrictions. Econometrica 55:849–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (2006) Skill formation and economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312:1900–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman DC, Olney WW (2011) Globalization and investment in human capital. Ind Labor Relat Rev 64:654–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin DA (2022) The trade reform wave of 1985–1995. Working paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

  • Jones BF (2014) The human capital stock: a generalized approach. Am Econ Rev 104:3752–3777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B (2018) Export expansion, skill acquisition and industry specialization: evidence from China. J Int Econ 114:346–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Song H, Xie H (2019) Long-term impact of trade liberalization on human capital formation. J Comp Econ 47:946–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22: 3–42

  • Lucas RE Jr (2015) Human capital and growth. Am Econ Rev105: 85–88

  • McCaig B, Nguyen M, Kaester R (2022) Export expansion and investment in children’s human capital: evidence from the U.S.-Vietnam bilateral trade agreement. Working paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quart J Econ 107:407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Phelps ES (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 56:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98:S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roser M, Ortiz-Ospina E (2016) Global education. https://ourworldindata.org/global-education. Accessed 15 May 2023

  • Sachs JD, Warner A (1995) Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:1–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoellman T (2012) Education quality and development accounting. Rev Econ Stud 79:388–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instrument in linear regression. In: Andrews DWK, Stock JH (eds) Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 80–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2022) Why Arab schoolboys are getting trounced by girls. London

  • Westoff CF (2010) Desired number of children: 2000–2008. DHS comparative reports no. 25, Maryland

  • Williams K (2021a) Do remittances condition the relationship between trade and government consumption? Appl Econ Lett 28:1571–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams K (2021b) Does national income mediate the relationship between trade and government size? Emp Econ 61:3029–3057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2023) World development indicator. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#. Accessed 17 May 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Sophia Preston and Zachary Williams for helpful and detail suggestions. I also thank the Editor, George Hondroyiannis, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Williams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 13

Table 13 Specification with interaction between trade and initial income per capita (placebo results)

, 14

Table 14 Impact of trade on fertility

and

Table 15 List of countries

15.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, K. Does trade shape educational decisions? The role of initial schooling. Econ Change Restruct 56, 3631–3663 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09547-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09547-z

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation