Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uncertainty and technological innovation: evidence from developed and developing countries

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainty will not only harm the economy but may also provide an opportunity for technological innovation. It is well established from past studies that technological innovation is a useful tool for reducing uncertainty across countries. However, it is not known whether this uncertainty can contribute to innovation across countries. Hence, in this study, we develop an empirical model to examine the impact of uncertainty on technological innovation across a global panel of both developed and developing countries over the period 2013–2018. Using generalized methods of moment (GMM), we find that uncertainty have significant negative and positive impact on technological innovation in developing and developed countries, respectively. Given these findings, the study argues that the role of uncertainty in improving technological innovation significantly varies across both developed and developing countries. Therefore, significant implications have to do with the fact that developing countries need to initiate effective action to look uncertainty as a key to unlocking opportunity, while developed countries should take into consideration that uncertainty is a viable strategy for addressing innovation ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source World Intellectual Property Organization (2019) & Hites Ahir (International Monetary Fund), Nicholas Bloom (Stanford University) and Davide Furceri (International Monetary Fund) (2020)

Fig. 2

Source World Intellectual Property Organization (2019) & Hites Ahir (International Monetary Fund), Nicholas Bloom (Stanford University) and Davide Furceri (International Monetary Fund) (2020)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs ZJ, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res Policy 31(7):1069–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akcali BY, Sismanoglu E (2015) Innovation and the effect of research and development (R&D) expenditure on growth in some developing and developed countries. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:768–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anokhin S, Schulze WS (2009) Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. J Bus Ventur 24(5):465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Bloch H (2004) Determinants of innovation. Small Bus Econ 22(2):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya U, Hsu P-H, Tian X, Xu Y (2017) What affects innovation more: Policy or policy Uncertainty? J Financ Quant Anal 52(5):1869–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J, Williams H (2019) A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. J Econ Perspect 33(3):163–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chege SM, Wang D, Suntu SL (2020) Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya. Inf Technol Dev 26(2):316–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (2021) Does political turnover stifle or stimulate corporate innovation? Int Rev Econ Financ 76:1126–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Puttitanun T (2005) Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. J Dev Econ 78(2):474–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Mao H, Feng Z (2020) Political uncertainty and firm entry: evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries. J Bus Res 120:16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2014a) Driving forces of technological change: the relation between population growth and technological innovation-analysis of the optimal interaction across countries. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 82(2):52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2014b) Religious culture, democratization and patterns of technological innovation. Int J Sustain Soc 6(4):397–418. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2014.066771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2015) Spatial relation between geo-climate zones and technological outputs to explain the evolution of technology. Int J Transit Innov Syst 4:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2015.074642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2017a) Varieties of capitalism’s theory of innovation and a conceptual integration with leadership-oriented executives: the relation between typologies of executive, technological and socioeconomic performances. Int J Public Sect Perform Manag 3(2):148–168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.084672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2017b) Sources of disruptive technologies for industrial change. L’industria -Rivista Di Economia e Politica Industriale 38(1):97–120. https://doi.org/10.1430/87140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2019) Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technol Soc 59:101124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M (2019) The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15028–15038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waldemar FS (2012) New products and corruption: evidence from Indian firms. Dev Econ 50(3):268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing A (2000) Sustainable innovation: drivers and barriers. Innovation and the environment. OECD: Paris, pp 103–125

  • Dincer OC, Fredriksson PG (2018) Corruption and environmental regulatory policy in the United States: Does trust matter? Resour Energy Econ 54:212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist C (1997) Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg J, Srholec M, Verspagen B (2010) Innovation and economic development. Handbook of the economics of innovation, Volume 2. Elsevier, pp 833–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02004-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falkinger J (1994) An Engelian model of growth and innovation with hierarchic consumer demand and unequal incomes. Ric Econ 48(2):123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman JL, Porter ME, Stern S (2002) The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res Policy 31:899–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan W, Xu X (2019) Does anti-corruption campaign promote corporate R&D investment? Evidence from China. Financ Res Lett 30:292–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Ma Y, Zhang X (2020) How does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate innovation?-Evidence from China listed companies. Int Rev Econ Financ 67:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hites Ahir (International Monetary Fund), Nicholas Bloom (Stanford University) and Davide Furceri (International Monetary Fund) (2020) World uncertainty index. Retrieved September 2020. http://policyuncertainty.com/wui_quarterly.html

  • Jalonen H (2012) The uncertainty of innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J Manag Res 4(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalonen H, Lehtonen A (2011) Uncertainty in the innovation process. In: European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship. Academic Conferences International Limited

  • Johnson GE (1997) Changes in earnings inequality: the role of demand shifts. J Econ Perspect 11(2):41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamova M, Johnstone N, Haščič I (2012) Implications of policy uncertainty for innovation in environmental technologies: the case of public R&D budgets. In: Costantini V, Mazzanti M (eds) The dynamics of environmental and economic systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 99–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Könnölä T, Eloranta V, Turunen T, Salo A (2021) Transformative governance of innovation ecosystems. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 173:121106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff NH (1964) Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. Am Behav Sci 8(3):8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui FT (1985) An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. J Polit Econ 93(4):760–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall BA, Johnson B, Andersen ES, Dalum B (2002) National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Res Policy 31:213–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin C, Leurent H (2017) Technology and innovation for the future of production: accelerating value creation. World Economic Forum, Geneva Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1968) Corruption: its causes and effects. In: Asian drama: an inquiry into the poverty of nations, vol II. Pantheon, New York (Reprinted in Political corruption: a handbook. Edited by a Heidenheimer et al. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, 1989:953–961)

  • Nguyen NA, Doan QH, Nguyen NM, Tran-Nam B (2016) The impact of petty corruption on firm innovation in Vietnam. Crime Law Soc Chang 65(4–5):377–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni L, Pompei F (2008a) Evaluating innovation and labour market relationships: the case of Italy. Camb J Econ 32:325–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni L, Pompei F (2008b) Labour market flexibility and innovation: geographical and technological determinants. Int J Manpow 29:216–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadani V, Gërguri S, Rexhepi G, Abduli S (2013) Innovation and economic development: the case of FYR of Macedonia. J Balkan near East Stud 15(3):324–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz MF, Cantner U (2019) Revisiting the relationship between corruption and innovation in developing and emerging economies. Crime Law Soc Chang 73(November):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling MA, Shankar R (2019) Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PH (2005) International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: a panel data study of developed and developing countries. J Dev Econ 78(2):529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdyukov P (2017) Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? J Res Innov Teach Learn 10(1):4–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tselios V (2011) Is inequality good for innovation? Int Reg Sci Rev 34(1):75–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varsakelis NC (2006) Education, political institutions and innovative activity: a cross-country empirical investigation. Res Policy 35(7):1083–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieluf S, Kaplan D, Klieme E, Bayer S (2012) Teaching practices and pedagogical innovation: evidence from TALIS. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wei Y, Song FM (2017) Uncertainty and corporate R&D investment: evidence from Chinese listed firms. Int Rev Econ Financ 47:176–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019) World development indicators. Retrieved September 2020 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator

  • World Intellectual Property Organization (2019) Global innovation index. Retrieved September 2020 https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index

  • Xu G, Yano G (2017) How does anti-corruption affect corporate innovation? Evidence from recent anti-corruption efforts in China. J Comp Econ 45(3):498–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JS (2017) The governance environment and innovative SMEs. Small Bus Econ 48(3):525–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweimüller J (2000) Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel’s law: the impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth. J Econ Growth 5(2):185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yogeeswari Subramaniam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 List of developed and developing countries

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subramaniam, Y., Loganathan, N. Uncertainty and technological innovation: evidence from developed and developing countries. Econ Change Restruct 55, 2527–2545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09402-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09402-7

Keywords

Navigation