Skip to main content
Log in

Is SADC an optimal currency area? Evidence from the generalized purchasing power parity test

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the likelihood of a proposed monetary union in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) from the view point of the generalized purchasing power parity (GPPP) hypothesis and optimum currency area theory. We apply Johansen’s multivariate co-integration technique. The findings from this study confirm that GPPP holds among SADC member countries included in this study on account of cointegration and stationarity in real exchange rate series. South African rand normalized long run beta coefficients of all the real exchange rates are below one except in the case of the Mauritian rupee and all bear negative signs except in the case of the Angolan New Kwanza and Mauritian rupee. This is evidence that supports monetary union in the region except for Angola and Mauritius. Moreover, the panel cointegration tests also confirm the cointegration among real exchange rate series of SADC countries. However, the absolute magnitudes of the short run adjustment coefficients of SADC countries’ real exchange rates are low and bear positive signs in some cases. This finding implies that the observed slow speed of adjustment for (log) real exchange rate of SADC member states might constrain the effectiveness of stabilization policies in the wake of external shocks, rendering SADC countries vulnerable to macroeconomic instability in the region. This result has important policy implications for the proposed monetary union in SADC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: authors, estimated from the database

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Even though there are other economic integration initiatives in Africa, the eight regional economic integration initiatives recognized by the African Union (AU) are; Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Economic Community of Central African states (ECCAS), the economic community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD),and Community of Sahel Saharan States (CEN-SAD) (Oloruntoba 2016).

  2. The Abuja Treaty was signed on 3 June, 1991, in Abuja, Nigeria, and entry into force on May 12, 1994 with the objective of establishing an African economic community (AEC) as an integral part of the Organization for African unity (OAU).

  3. The fifteen countries forming SADC are Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Malawi, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

  4. Both trace and maximum eigenvalue tests are likelihood ratio type tests, however, both operate under different assumptions regarding the deterministic part of the data generation process. The trace test tends to have more distorted sizes whereas their power in some situations superior to that of the maximum eigenvalue tests (Lütkepohl et al 2001).

  5. An economic variable tends to be weakly exogenous if its speed of adjustment coefficient is not statistically different from zero (Harris 1995). Such a variable has no explanatory power with respect to the long run coefficients.

References

  • Abbas F, Hiemenz U (2013) What determines public health expenditures in Pakistan? Role of income, urbanization and unemployment. Econ Change Restruct 46:341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne J (2008) Real exchange rate dynamics and monetary integration in crisis-affectedregions. J Int Glob Econ Stud 1(2):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess R (2009) The South African development community’s macroeconomic convergence programme: initial performance. IMF staff position note, SPN/09/14

  • Chang T, Liu WC, Lee C (2010) Purchasing power parity for 15 COMESA and SADC countries: evidence based on panel SURADF tests. Appl Econ Lett 17(17):1721–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiemeke CC (2010) On an optimal currency area for the GCC countries: an analysis of the economic impact on the Kuwait economy. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 6(4):295–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders W, Hurn S (1994) The theory of generalised purchasing power parity: tests in Pacific Rim. Rev Int Econ 2:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus G, Hartzenberg T (2012) The tripartite free trade area towards a new African paradigm? Trade law centre for Southern Africa. Swedish International Development Agency, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding D, Lee K, Shields K (2012) Does one size fit all? Modelling macroeconomic linkages in the West African Economic and Monetary Union. Econ Change Restruct 45:45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao H (2007) Optimal currency area: an empirical study on selected East Asian economies. Front Econ China 2(4):594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geda A, Kebret H (2007) Regional economic integration in Africa: a review of problems and prospects with a case study of COMESA. J Afr Econ 17(3):357–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris R (1995) Cointegration analysis in econometric modelling, Prentice hall/harvester wheatsheaf, London

  • Ingram J (1973) The case for European monetary integration. Princeton essays in international finance no 98. Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1996) Likelihood based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Chiang MH (2000) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi BH (ed) Advances in econometrics: nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels, vol. 15. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Wagon Lane, pp 179–222

  • Kenen PB (1969) Theory of optimum currency areas. In: Mundell R, Swoboda A (eds) Monetary problems in the international economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Krichene N (1998) Purchasing power parity in five east African countries: Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda, IMF working paper, WP/98/148. African Department, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, October

  • Lütkepohl H, Saikkonen P, Trenkler C (2001) Maximum eigenvalue versus trace tests for the cointegrating rank of a VAR process. Econ J 4:287–310

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon R (1963) Optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 53:717–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkenda B (2001) Is East Africa, an optimum currency area? Working paper, no. 41. Goteborg University

  • Mokoena TM, Gupta R, van Eyden R (2009) Testing for PPP using SADC real exchange rates. S Afr J Econ 77(3):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundell R (1961) A theory of optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 51:657–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagayasu J (2002) Does the long-run PPP hypothesis hold for Africa? Evidence from a panel cointegration study. Bull Econ Res 54:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:1519–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusair SA (2012) Nonlinear adjustment of Asian real exchange rates. Econ Change Restruct 45:221–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa E, Kawasaki K (2003) Possibility of creating a common currency basket for East Asia. Discussion paper no. 5. JBIC Institute, Tokyo, Japan

  • Olayungbo DO (2011) Purchasing power parity in selected sub Saharan African countries: evidence from panel unit root tests. J Emerg Trends Econ Manag Sci 2(4):270–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Oloruntoba S (2016) Regional integration in Africa: EU–ACP economic agreements and Euro-Nigerian relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto K (2008) Does West Africa an optimum currency area? A generalised PPP approach. Osaka Econ Pap 58(2):225–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapsoba SJ-A (2009) Trade intensity and business cycle synchronicity in Africa. J Afr Econ 8(2):287–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Taylor MP (2004) The purchasing power parity debate. J Econ Perspect 18(4):135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M (2014) Revisiting purchasing power parity for India using threshold cointegration and nonlinear unit root test. Econ Change Restruct 47:117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNECA (2010) Assessing regional integration in Africa IV: enhancing intra-African trade. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Wilson P, Choy KM (2007) Prospects for enhanced exchange rate cooperation in East Asia: somepreliminary findings from generalized PPP theory. Appl Econ 39:981–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerihun MF, Breitenbach MC, Kemegue F (2014) Greek wedding in SADC? Testing for structural symmetry toward SADC monetary integration. Afr Financ J 16(2):16–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerihun MF, Breitenbach MC, Kemegue F (2016) Exploring exchange rate based policy coordination in SADC. Stud Econ Financ 33(4):576–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. George Hondroyiannis, the editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Change and Restructure and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestion for the substantial improvements in this version of the paper. We also acknowledge the financial support from Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mulatu F. Zerihun.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8 and Fig. 1.

Table 7 Summary of PPP/GPPP studies in SSA.
Table 8 Descriptive statistics and normality test of SADC real exchange rate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zerihun, M.F., Breitenbach, M.C. Is SADC an optimal currency area? Evidence from the generalized purchasing power parity test. Econ Change Restruct 51, 173–188 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-017-9204-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-017-9204-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation