Abstract
Previous studies that investigated the short-run and long-run effects of depreciation of the Korean won on the Korean trade balance with the rest of the world have not been able to discover significant effects. Suspecting that these studies suffer from aggregation bias, we disaggregate Korean trade flows with the rest of the world by commodity and consider the response of trade balances of 148 industries to changes in the real effective exchange rate of the won. We find that in the short run the trade balance of 91 industries are affected by exchange rate changes. However, the short-run effects last into favorable long-run only in 26 industries, a unique finding that is absent from the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note that Bahmani-Oskooee and Alse (1994) is another study that included Korea. However, since Korean trade balance and its real effective exchange rate were integrated of different order, cointegration technique could not be applied.
Note that the main reason for using the ratio is to be able to express the model in log linear form.
For some other applications of this approach see Bahmani-Oskooee et al. (2005), Bahmani-Oskooee and Hegerty (2007), Halicioglu (2007), Narayan et al. (2007), Tang (2007), Mohammadi et al. (2008), Wong and Tang (2008), De Vita and Kyaw (2008), and Payne (2008) and for some other determinants of the current account see Brissimis et al. (2012, 2013).
Note that most of these 26 industries are small, as measured by their trade shares reported next to the name of each industry in Table 2. Only two relatively large industries seem to benefit from real depreciation the won in the long run. They are 599 (Chemical materials and products) with 1.12 % of the market share and 735 (Ships and boats) with 5.26 % of the market share.
For more on this issue see Bahmani-Oskooee (1986).
Note that in industries such as 71 (Coffee) in which the coefficient is -1.62, almost 80 % of the adjustment takes place in six months since the data are annual.
References
Agbola FW, Damoense MY (2005) Time-series estimation of import demand functions for pulses in India. J Econ Stud 32:146–157
Ardalani Z, Bahmani-Oskooee M (2007) Is there a J-curve at the industry level? Econ Bull 6(26):1–12
Bahmani-Oskooee M (1985) Devaluation and the J-curve: some evidence from LDCs. Rev Econ Stat 67:500–504
Bahmani-Oskooee M (1986) Determinants of international trade flows: the case of developing countries. J Dev Econ 20(1):107–123
Bahmani-Oskooee M (1989) Devaluation and the J-curve: some evidence from LDCs: errata. Rev Econ Stat 69:553–554
Bahmani-Oskooee M (1998) Cointegration approach to estimate the long-run trade elasticities in LDCs. Int Econ J 12:89–96
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Alse J (1994) Short-run versus long run effects of devaluation: error-correction modeling and cointegration. East Econ J 20(4):453–464
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty SW (2007) Exchange rate volatility and trade flows: a review article. J Econ Stud 34:211–255
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty S (2010) The J- and S-curves: a survey of the recent literature. J Econ Stud 37:580–596
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Kara O (2005) Income and price elasticities of trade: some new estimates. Int Trade J 19(2):165–178
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Malixi M (1992) More evidence on the J-curve from LDCs. J Policy Model 14:641–653
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Niroomand F (1998) Long-run price elasticities and the Marshall–Lerner condition revisited. Econ Lett 61(1):101–109
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Economidou C, Goswami GG (2005) How sensitive are Britain’s inpayments and outpayments to the value of the British pound. J Econ Stud 32:455–467
Boyd D, Caporale GM, Smith R (2001) Real exchange rate effects on the balance of trade: cointegration and the Marshall–Lerner condition. Int J Financ Econ 6:187–200
Brissimis SN, Hondroyiannis G, Papazoglou C, Tsaveas NT, Vasardani MA (2012) Current account determinants and external sustainability in periods of structural change. Econ Chang Restruct 45:71–95
Brissimis SN, Hondroyiannis G, Papazoglou C, Tsaveas NT, Vasardani MA (2013) The determinants of current account imbalances in the euro area: a panel estimation approach. Econ Chang Restruct 46:299–319
Caporale GM, Chui MKF (1999) Estimating income and price elasticities of trade in a cointegration framework. Rev Int Econ 7:254–264
De Vita G, Kyaw KS (2008) Determinants of capital flows to developing countries: a structural VAR analysis. J Econ Stud 35:304–322
Du H, Zhu Z (2001) The effect of exchange-rate risk on exports: some additional empirical evidence. J Econ Stud 28:106–121
Gylfason T, Risager O (1984) Does devaluation improve the current account? Eur Econ Rev 25:37–64
Halicioglu F (2007) The J-curve dynamics of turkish bilateral trade: a cointegration approach. J Econ Stud 34:103–119
Houthakker HS, Magee SP (1969) Income and price elasticities in world trade. Rev Econ Stat 51:111–125
Hsing H-M (2005) Re-examination of J-curve effect for Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Jpn World Econ 17:43–58
Hsing H-M, Savvides A (1996) Does a J-curve exist for Korea and Taiwan? Open Econ Rev 7:127–145
Ibarra CA (2011) A note on intermediate imports and the BPCG model in Mexico. Econ Chang Restruct 44:357–368
Khan MS (1974) Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff Pap 21:678–693
Love J, Chandra R (2005) Testing export-led growth in South Asia. J Econ Stud 32:132–145
Mohammadi H, Cak M, Cak D (2008) Wagner’s hypothesis: new evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach. J Econ Stud 35:94–106
Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37:1979–1990
Narayan S, Narayan PK (2005) An empirical analysis of Fiji’s import demand function. J Econ Stud 32:158–168
Narayan PK, Narayan S, Prasad BC, Prasad A (2007) Export-led growth hypothesis: evidence from Papua New Guinea and Fiji. J Econ Stud 34:341–351
Payne JE (2008) Inflation and inflation uncertainty: evidence from the Caribbean region. J Econ Stud 35:501–511
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326
Rose AK (1991) The role of exchange rates in a popular model of international trade: does the Marshall–Lerner condition hold? J Int Econ 30:301–316
Rose AK, Yellen JL (1989) Is there a J-curve? J Monet Econ 24(1):53–68
Tang TC (2007) Money demand function for southeast Asian countries: an empirical view from expenditure components. J Econ Stud 34:476–496
Warner D, Kreinin ME (1983) Determinants of international trade flows. Rev Econ Stat 65:96–104
Wong KN, Tang TC (2008) The effects of exchange rate variability on Malaysia’s disaggregated electrical exports. J Econ Stud 35:154–169
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Data definition and sources
Appendix: Data definition and sources
Annual data over the period 1971–2011 are used d to carry out the empirical analysis. They l come from the following sources:
-
1.
The World Bank.
-
2.
International Financial Statistics of the IMF.
-
3.
Bank for International Settlements.
Variables:
Mi = Korean imports of commodity i from rest of the world in US dollars. Source (1).
Xi = Korean exports of commodity ii to the rest of the world in US dollars. Source (2).
YKOR = Index of Korean real GDP (2005 = 100), source (2).
YWOR = Index of Industrial production in advanced economies (2005 = 100), source (2).
REER = The Real Effective Exchange Rate of Korean won. Source (3). A decline reflects a real depreciation of the won.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Zhang, R. Is there J-Curve effect in the commodity trade between Korea and rest of the world?. Econ Change Restruct 47, 227–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-013-9148-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-013-9148-5