Skip to main content
Log in

Is there J-Curve effect in the commodity trade between Korea and rest of the world?

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies that investigated the short-run and long-run effects of depreciation of the Korean won on the Korean trade balance with the rest of the world have not been able to discover significant effects. Suspecting that these studies suffer from aggregation bias, we disaggregate Korean trade flows with the rest of the world by commodity and consider the response of trade balances of 148 industries to changes in the real effective exchange rate of the won. We find that in the short run the trade balance of 91 industries are affected by exchange rate changes. However, the short-run effects last into favorable long-run only in 26 industries, a unique finding that is absent from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an estimate of import and export demand functions for some other countries see Du and Zhu (2001), Love and Chandra (2005), Agbola and Damoense (2005), Narayan and Narayan (2005), and Ibarra (2011).

  2. Note that Bahmani-Oskooee and Alse (1994) is another study that included Korea. However, since Korean trade balance and its real effective exchange rate were integrated of different order, cointegration technique could not be applied.

  3. Note that the main reason for using the ratio is to be able to express the model in log linear form.

  4. For some other applications of this approach see Bahmani-Oskooee et al. (2005), Bahmani-Oskooee and Hegerty (2007), Halicioglu (2007), Narayan et al. (2007), Tang (2007), Mohammadi et al. (2008), Wong and Tang (2008), De Vita and Kyaw (2008), and Payne (2008) and for some other determinants of the current account see Brissimis et al. (2012, 2013).

  5. Note that most of these 26 industries are small, as measured by their trade shares reported next to the name of each industry in Table 2. Only two relatively large industries seem to benefit from real depreciation the won in the long run. They are 599 (Chemical materials and products) with 1.12 % of the market share and 735 (Ships and boats) with 5.26 % of the market share.

  6. For more on this issue see Bahmani-Oskooee (1986).

  7. Note that in industries such as 71 (Coffee) in which the coefficient is -1.62, almost 80 % of the adjustment takes place in six months since the data are annual.

References

  • Agbola FW, Damoense MY (2005) Time-series estimation of import demand functions for pulses in India. J Econ Stud 32:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardalani Z, Bahmani-Oskooee M (2007) Is there a J-curve at the industry level? Econ Bull 6(26):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M (1985) Devaluation and the J-curve: some evidence from LDCs. Rev Econ Stat 67:500–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M (1986) Determinants of international trade flows: the case of developing countries. J Dev Econ 20(1):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M (1989) Devaluation and the J-curve: some evidence from LDCs: errata. Rev Econ Stat 69:553–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M (1998) Cointegration approach to estimate the long-run trade elasticities in LDCs. Int Econ J 12:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Alse J (1994) Short-run versus long run effects of devaluation: error-correction modeling and cointegration. East Econ J 20(4):453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty SW (2007) Exchange rate volatility and trade flows: a review article. J Econ Stud 34:211–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty S (2010) The J- and S-curves: a survey of the recent literature. J Econ Stud 37:580–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Kara O (2005) Income and price elasticities of trade: some new estimates. Int Trade J 19(2):165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Malixi M (1992) More evidence on the J-curve from LDCs. J Policy Model 14:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Niroomand F (1998) Long-run price elasticities and the Marshall–Lerner condition revisited. Econ Lett 61(1):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee M, Economidou C, Goswami GG (2005) How sensitive are Britain’s inpayments and outpayments to the value of the British pound. J Econ Stud 32:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd D, Caporale GM, Smith R (2001) Real exchange rate effects on the balance of trade: cointegration and the Marshall–Lerner condition. Int J Financ Econ 6:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brissimis SN, Hondroyiannis G, Papazoglou C, Tsaveas NT, Vasardani MA (2012) Current account determinants and external sustainability in periods of structural change. Econ Chang Restruct 45:71–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brissimis SN, Hondroyiannis G, Papazoglou C, Tsaveas NT, Vasardani MA (2013) The determinants of current account imbalances in the euro area: a panel estimation approach. Econ Chang Restruct 46:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale GM, Chui MKF (1999) Estimating income and price elasticities of trade in a cointegration framework. Rev Int Econ 7:254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita G, Kyaw KS (2008) Determinants of capital flows to developing countries: a structural VAR analysis. J Econ Stud 35:304–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du H, Zhu Z (2001) The effect of exchange-rate risk on exports: some additional empirical evidence. J Econ Stud 28:106–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gylfason T, Risager O (1984) Does devaluation improve the current account? Eur Econ Rev 25:37–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halicioglu F (2007) The J-curve dynamics of turkish bilateral trade: a cointegration approach. J Econ Stud 34:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker HS, Magee SP (1969) Income and price elasticities in world trade. Rev Econ Stat 51:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsing H-M (2005) Re-examination of J-curve effect for Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Jpn World Econ 17:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsing H-M, Savvides A (1996) Does a J-curve exist for Korea and Taiwan? Open Econ Rev 7:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra CA (2011) A note on intermediate imports and the BPCG model in Mexico. Econ Chang Restruct 44:357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS (1974) Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff Pap 21:678–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love J, Chandra R (2005) Testing export-led growth in South Asia. J Econ Stud 32:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi H, Cak M, Cak D (2008) Wagner’s hypothesis: new evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach. J Econ Stud 35:94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37:1979–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan S, Narayan PK (2005) An empirical analysis of Fiji’s import demand function. J Econ Stud 32:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S, Prasad BC, Prasad A (2007) Export-led growth hypothesis: evidence from Papua New Guinea and Fiji. J Econ Stud 34:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JE (2008) Inflation and inflation uncertainty: evidence from the Caribbean region. J Econ Stud 35:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AK (1991) The role of exchange rates in a popular model of international trade: does the Marshall–Lerner condition hold? J Int Econ 30:301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AK, Yellen JL (1989) Is there a J-curve? J Monet Econ 24(1):53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang TC (2007) Money demand function for southeast Asian countries: an empirical view from expenditure components. J Econ Stud 34:476–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner D, Kreinin ME (1983) Determinants of international trade flows. Rev Econ Stat 65:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KN, Tang TC (2008) The effects of exchange rate variability on Malaysia’s disaggregated electrical exports. J Econ Stud 35:154–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee.

Appendix: Data definition and sources

Appendix: Data definition and sources

Annual data over the period 1971–2011 are used d to carry out the empirical analysis. They l come from the following sources:

  1. 1.

    The World Bank.

  2. 2.

    International Financial Statistics of the IMF.

  3. 3.

    Bank for International Settlements.

Variables:

Mi = Korean imports of commodity i from rest of the world in US dollars. Source (1).

Xi = Korean exports of commodity ii to the rest of the world in US dollars. Source (2).

YKOR = Index of Korean real GDP (2005 = 100), source (2).

YWOR = Index of Industrial production in advanced economies (2005 = 100), source (2).

REER = The Real Effective Exchange Rate of Korean won. Source (3). A decline reflects a real depreciation of the won.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Zhang, R. Is there J-Curve effect in the commodity trade between Korea and rest of the world?. Econ Change Restruct 47, 227–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-013-9148-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-013-9148-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation