Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics and prospects for East Asian economic integration: a Korean perspective

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In terms of economic regionalism, East Asia lags far behind other major regions. It was only recently that institutionalization of regional economic integration was started among East Asia countries. However, functional economic integration has continuously proceeded among East Asian economies even without a region-wide RTA. This paper analyzes the trends of functional economic integration both in terms of trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) among East Asian economies, and reviews recent developments of economic regionalism in East Asia. It also addresses the prospects for a region-wide FTA in East Asia and draws some policy implications for East Asian countries at this juncture of economic regionalism in East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm.

  2. Before these new waves of FTAs, three preferential arrangements (the Bangkok Agreement, the Laos-Thailand Preferential Arrangement, and AFTA) were the only regional trade agreements (RTAs) in East Asia.

  3. The trends of the share of intraregional FDI outflows also show a high volatility. For 1990–2003, the share of intraregional FDI outflows increased from 13.9 to 39.0%, while those of the EU and NAFTA changed from 60.2 to 32.2% and from 24.2 to 16.6%, respectively (see Appendix Table 4).

  4. Lee (2003). However, this trilateral summit was not held in 2005 because of aggravated political relations among them.

  5. Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway are the members of the European Free Trade Association.

  6. Lee (2004); Baldwin (1999).

  7. Lee (2004).

  8. ibid.

  9. Shott and Goodrich (2004).

  10. Lee (2002).

References

  • Annual Statistical Yearbook (1998–2004) Bureau of Statistics, China

  • ASEAN Secretariat (2003) Statistics of Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN: Comprehensive Data Set-2003 Edition

  • Baldwin R (1999) A Domino theory of regionalism. In: Bhagwati J, Krishna P, Panagariya A (eds) Trading blocs: alternative approaches to analyzing preferential trade arrangements. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 479–502

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2005) Direction of trade statistics

  • Lee CJ (2002) East Asian economic regionalism and the role of South Korea. Paper presented at the Korea Conference on “Korea as a 21st Century Power,” at the University of Cambridge, on 3rd–6th April 2002

  • Lee CJ (2003) Towards a Northeast Asian economic community: a Korean perspective. In: Kim Y, Lee CJ (eds) Northeast Asian economic integration: prospects for a Northeast Asian FTA. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Seoul, pp 264–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CJ (2004) Rationale for enhancing Northeast Asian economic cooperation and some possible options. In: Kim YH, Lee CJ (eds) Strengthening economic cooperation in Northeast Asia. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) International direct investment statistics yearbook 2002

  • OECD (2003) International direct investment statistics yearbook 2003

  • OECD (2004) International direct investment statistics yearbook 2004

  • Shott JJ, Goodrich B (2004) Reflections on economic integration in Northeast Asia. In: Kim YH, Lee CJ (eds) Strengthening economic cooperation in Northeast Asia. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Jae Lee.

Appendices

Appendices

Table 1 Share of intraregional trade and its simple concentration ratio in ASEAN+3, NAFTA, and the EU
Table 2 Share of intraregional trade and its simple concentration ratio in ASEAN+5, NAFTA, and the EU
Table 3 Share of intraregional FDI inflows in ASEAN+3, NAFTA, and the EU (unit: percent)
Table 4 Share of intraregional FDI outflows in ASEAN+3, NAFTA, and the EU (unit: percent)
Table 5 Simple concentration ratio of intraregional FDI inflows in ASEAN+3, NAFTA and the EU

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, C.J. Characteristics and prospects for East Asian economic integration: a Korean perspective. Econ Change Restruct 41, 331–344 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-008-9055-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-008-9055-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation