Skip to main content
Log in

The profitability life-cycle of direct investment: an international panel study

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we test competing hypotheses about the shape of the time-profile of foreign direct investment profitability on a panel of countries. Using partial linearization method we derive the time-profile of the cumulative profitability for the stock of direct investment from aggregate macroeconomic data. By testing the non-linearity hypothesis of the cumulative profitability life-cycle of direct investment we find a cubic curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. EU-15, CEEC-5 (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia), CEEC-14 (other CEEC including Russia), and other countries (mainly USA, Canada, and Switzerland).

  2. Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Croatia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

  3. \( V_{z} = \sum\nolimits_{{n = 1}}^{\infty } {nFDI_{{z - n}} } /\sum\nolimits_{{n = 1}}^{\infty } {FDI_{{z - n}} } \), where z is time (year) and FDI is inflow of FDI in the year z.

  4. In the particular example above, the non-shaded columns in the figure represent the linear shape of cumulative profitability of FDI. However, in general the size of the columns might not be increasing proportionally and thus the shape of the cumulative profitability might be non-linear.

  5. But usually, the foreign investors try to acquire a majority share of affiliate’s equity capital in order to ensure future dividends.

  6. Commonly accredited to Clement Juglar (1819–1905), ‘short-term cycles’ refer to a period of between 7 and 11 years and were based on historical financial information. Juglar (1889) studied business conditions and confirmed that their actions were not completely random, but generally operated within a number of regular cycles. He described three distinct phases in the cycle, namely prosperity, crisis, and liquidation.

References

  • Altzinger W (2006) On the profitability of Austrian firms in the new EU member states. Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Mon Rep 3/2006:4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brada JC, Tomšík V (2004) Zahraniční investice a náchylnost k měnovým krizím: zkušenosti tranzitivních ekonomik (Foreign investment and perceptions of vulnerability to foreign exchange crises: evidence from transition economies). Polit Ekon 52(3):313–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Brada JC, Tomšík V (2003) Reinvested earnings bias, the “five percent” rule and the interpretation of the balance of payments—with an application to transition economies. University of Michigan Business School: William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series no. 543. http://www.wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp543.pdf. Cited 25 May 2007

  • Brealey RA, Myers SC (1991) Principles of Corporate Finance, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1993) Multinational Enterprises and the global economy. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1977) Trade, location of economic activity and MNE: a search for an eclectic approach. In: Ohlin B, Hesselborn P, Wilkman P (eds) The International Location of Economic Activity. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2008) Statistical Office of the European Communities Eurostat Database. Luxembourg. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 21 February 2008

  • Groppelli AA, Nikbakht E (2000) Barron’s Finance, 4th edn. Barron’s Educational Series, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung QN (2004) Product cycle mechanism with foreign direct investment and the technology transfer. University of Tokyo, Tokyo

  • Juglar C (1889) Des crises commerciales et de leur retour periodique en France, en Angleterre et aux Etats-Unis, 2nd edn. Guillaumin et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994) Assessing investment opportunities in economies in Transition. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, Vol. I. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1994) Multinationals and the U.S. Technology Base. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filip Novotný.

Additional information

The opinions in this article are of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Czech National Bank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novotný, F., Podpiera, J. The profitability life-cycle of direct investment: an international panel study. Econ Change Restruct 41, 143–153 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-008-9045-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-008-9045-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation