Abstract
This study explored young children’s perceptions of engineers and engineering through their drawings and narratives. Twenty-six children ranging from four-to eight-years-old participated. Results indicated that although children in this group had limited knowledge of engineers and engineering, most of them, regardless of gender, not only drew engineers reflecting their own gender, but they also identified themselves as engineers already. More than half of them would like to become engineers when they grow up. This study supports the idea that young children are capable engineering learners and calls for age-appropriate, play-based engineering learning experiences in the early years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2015). Early science learning experiences: Triggered and maintained interest. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_1
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283121143329
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
Ata-Aktürk, A. (2019). Development of A STEM based engineering design curriculum for parental involvement in early childhood education. [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/43849
Ata-Aktürk, A., & Demircan, H. (2021). Engineers and engineering through the eyes of preschoolers: A phenomenographic study of children’s drawings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1974067
Barrett-Zahn, E. (2019). Early childhood engineering experiences. Science and Children, 57(3), 6.
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA.
Çakmak, B., Bilen, K., & Taner, M. S. (2019). The perceptions of middle school students’ about engineer and engineering. Anatolian Journal of Teacher, 3(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.559599
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(49). Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049/full
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
Dorie, B., Cardella, M. E., & Svarovsky, G. N. (2014). Capturing the design thinking of young children interacting with a parent [Paper 52]. 121st ASEE annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enegs/52/
Emvalotis, A., & Koutsianou, A. (2018). Greek primary school students’ images of scientists and their work: Has anything changed? Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1366899
English, L. D., & Moore, T. J. (2018). Early engineering learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2
Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9133-3
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
Haden, C. A., Jant, E. A., Hoffman, P. C., Marcus, M., Geddes, J. R., & Gaskins, S. (2014). Supporting family conversations and children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.004
Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM Initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96–122. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ952045.pdf
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Bernstein-Sierra, S. (2017). Designing for success in STEM communities of practice: Philosophy and personal interactions. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0002
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004, June). Draw an engineer: Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. In 2004 Annual Conference (pp. 9–482). https://peer.asee.org/12831.pdf
Krippendorff, K. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
Lippard, C., Riley, K., & Lamm, M. (2018). Encouraging the development of engineering habits of mind in prekindergarten learners. In L. English & T. Moore (Eds.), Early engineering learning. Early mathematics learning and development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_8
Liu, M., & Chiang, F. K. (2020). Middle school students’ perceptions of engineers: A case study of Beijing students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09513-9
Lyons, T. (2020). Seeing through the acronym to the nature of STEM. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00108-2
Mann, A., Massey, D., Glover, P., Kashefpadkel, E. T., & Dawkins, J. (2013). Nothing in common: The career aspirations of young Britons mapped against projected labour market demand (2010–2020). Occasional Taskforce Research Paper, (2). https://www.educationandemployers.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/nothing_in_common_final.pdf
Mannon, S. E., & Schreuders, P. D. (2007). All in the (engineering) family? The family occupational background of men and women engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v13.i4.20
McClure, E. (2017). More than a foundation: Young children are capable STEM learners. Young Children, 72(5). https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/nov2017/STEM-learners
McClure, E., Guernsey, D., Clements, S., Bales, J., Nichols, Taylor, N., & Levine, H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2008). Ready, set, SCIENCE!: Putting research to work in k-8 science classrooms. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? National Academies Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education. Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2018). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://ncses-nsf-gov.ezproxy.liberty.edu/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables#group2
Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I., & Arriassecq, I. (2021). A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. Science and Education, 31, 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
Pattison, S. A., Weiss, S., Ramos-Montanez, S., Gontan, I., Svarovsky, G., Corrie, P. G., Benne, M., Núñez, V., & Smith, C. (2018). Engineering in early childhood: Describing family-level interest development systems. NARST 91st Annual International Conference, Atlanta, GA. https://informalscience.org/engineering-early-childhood-describing-family-level-interest-development-systems
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016111
Piaget, J. (1971). The child’s conception of world (6th ed.). Redwood Press.
Purzer, Ş., & Douglas, K. A. (2018). Assessing early engineering thinking and design competencies in the classroom. In L. D. English & T. J. Moore (Eds.), Early engineering learning (pp. 113–132). Springer.
Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20159
Slee, P. T., & Skrzypiec, G. (2016). No more bullying: An analysis of primary school children’s drawings of school bullying. Educational Psychology, 36(8), 1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1034089
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Svarovsky, G. N., Cardella, M., Dorie, B. L., & King, Z. (2017). Productive forms of facilitation for young girls during engineering activities within informal learning settings. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, , April 27–May 1.
Svarovsky, G. N., Wagner, C., & Monica, C. (2018). Exploring moments of agency for girls during an engineering activity. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 6(3), 302–319.
Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2010). Engineers in the classroom: Their influence on African-American students’ perceptions of engineering. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17828.x
Torres-Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From fearing STEM to playing with it: the natural integration of STEM into the preschool classroom. SRATE Journal, 23(2), 8–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044758.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods (Vol. 6). Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, T., Jack, L. Engineers in Young Children’s Minds: An Exploratory Case Study of Young Children’s Drawings and Narratives. Early Childhood Educ J 52, 435–442 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01442-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01442-6