Abstract
Embracing curricular reforms such as the Next Generation Science Standards poses unique challenges for early childhood science teachers who often value play and curiosity, but are challenged by the depth of scientific disciplinary practices expected by these standards. To explore possibilities for teacher growth, this research draws on Noddings’ theory of relational care as being foundational to teachers’ use of dialogue for the purpose of knowledge generation in science. This research relied on an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to examine the views and practices of 33 early childhood teachers. Data sources included teachers’ written reflections on a professional workshop, interviews, and responses to a survey measuring their Epistemic Orientations. Findings suggest that most early childhood teachers were oriented toward knowledge replication, not knowledge generation, which limits their ability to use dialogue as an epistemic tool. Relatedly, most teachers who were oriented toward knowledge replication expressed views consistent with the virtue of care, while teachers oriented toward knowledge generation described enacting relational care with their students as they used dialogue to support and challenge their scientific explanations. Implications of this study indicate the importance of early childhood teachers’ Epistemic Orientations as a foundational component of how they engage in science teaching through dialogue and their willingness to teach in ways aligned with curricular reforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Areljung, S., Due, K., Ottander, C., Skoog, M., & Sundberg, B. (2021). Why and how teachers make use of drawing activities in early childhood science education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(13), 2127–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1953186
Au, W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815614916
Brownlee, J. L., Ferguson, L. E., & Ryan, M. (2017). Changing teachers’ epistemic cognition: A new conceptual framework for epistemic reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1333430
Chen, Y.-C., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2016). Examining the use of talk and writing for students’ development of scientific conceptual knowledge through constructing and critiquing arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 34(2), 100–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9072-7
Collins, K., & Glover, M. (2015). I am reading: Nurturing young children’s meaning making and joyful engagement with any book. Heinemann.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Sage.
Fleer, M. (2009). Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in ‘a roundabout way’ in play-based contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1069–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801953161
Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). An introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
Hand, B., Cavagnetto, A., Chen, Y. C., & Park, S. (2016). Moving past curricula and strategies: Language and the development of adaptive pedagogy for immersive learning environments. Research in Science Education, 46(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9499-1
Hand, B., Chen, Y.-C., & Suh, J. K. (2021). Does a knowledge generation approach tolearning benefit students? A systematic review of research on the science writing heuristic approach. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 535–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09550-0
Helm, J. H. (2015). Becoming young thinkers: Deep project work in the classroom. Teachers College Press.
Hoffman, J. V., Lammert, C., DeJulio, S., Tily, S., & Svrcek, N. (2020). Preservice teachers engaging elementary students in an activist curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 55(1), 9–31.
Isidro, E. I. (2021). Disciplinary literacies in K-2 classrooms: A curriculum exploration. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1990
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Kang, N. H. (2008). Learning to teach science: Personal epistemologies, teaching goals, and practices of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.002
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2020). Students’ perceptions of socio-scientific issue-based learning and their appropriation of epistemic tools for systems thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1339–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1759843
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084.
Lammert, C., & Riordan, E. (2019). “She’s not going to tell you what to ask:” Strategies for writing in science. The Reading Teacher, 72(7), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1824
Lammert, C., Suh, J. K., Hand, B., & Fulmer, G. (2022). Is epistemic orientation the chicken or the egg in professional development for knowledge generation approaches? Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103747
Maggioni, L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2008). The role of teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration in instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8
Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
Moje, E. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Education Research, 31(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046001
Moll, L. C., Cathy, A., Neff, D., & Gonzales, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Noddings, N. (2005). Caring in education. InFed.
Noddings, N. (1984/2013a). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd Edn.) University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st century. Teacher’s College Press.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
Nxumalo, F., Gagliardi, L. M., & Won, H. R. (2020). Inquiry-based curriculum in early childhood education. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia.
Park, S., Kite, V., Suh, J. K., Jung, J., & Rachmatullah, A. (2021). Investigation of the relationships among science teachers’ epistemic orientations, epistemic understanding, and implementation of Next Generation Science Standards science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21737
Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Sage.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
Suh, J. K., Hwang, J., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2022). Epistemic orientation toward teaching science for knowledge generation: Conceptualization and validation of the construct. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21769
The Public Voice Salon. (2017, August 31). Nel Noddings on education for caring [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU_2-4SR-gk
Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2012). Visions, enactments, obstacles, and negotiations: Case studies of two novice teachers enrolled in a graduate literacy course. Journal of Reading Education, 38(1), 18–25.
Funding
This research received funding from the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed to study design. Data collection and analysis was performed by CL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CL, and both authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Research involving human and animal rights
This research involved human subjects. This research received approval from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Iowa, Approval #201804703. All participants provided informed, active consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lammert, C., Hand, B. Early Childhood Science Teachers’ Epistemic Orientations: A Foundation for Enacting Relational Care Through Dialogue. Early Childhood Educ J 52, 879–889 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01427-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01427-x