Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complex Texts or Leveled Readers for the Primary Grades? Yes and Yes!

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This manuscript describes the current debate about the use of leveled readers during literacy instruction. Some experts claim that leveled readers are overused in classrooms, at the expense of more complex texts. As a result, students may lack exposure to sophisticated vocabulary and varied text structures. In contrast, other experts assert that leveled readers are needed to ensure that students are taught in developmentally appropriate ways, and that optimal learning occurs when these texts are used during reading instruction. The purpose of this manuscript is to shed light on both sides of the debate, and to ultimately help teachers integrate diverse instructional materials into their teaching repertoire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allington, R. L. (2002). You can’t learn much from books you can’t read. Educational Leadership, 60, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. L., McCuiston, K., & Billen, M. (2015). What research says about text complexity and learning to read. The Reading Teacher, 68(7), 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ankrum, J. W., Genest, M. T., & Belcastro, E. G. (2014). The power of verbal scaffolding “Showing” beginning readers how to use reading strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2001). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (2005). Literacy lessons designed for individuals part two: Teaching procedures. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (2006). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruin-Parecki, A., & Squibb, K. (2011). Promoting at-risk preschool children’s comprehension through research-based strategy instruction. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 51(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Catts, H. (2015). The influence of reading on vocabulary growth: A case for a Matthew effect. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (Online), 58(3), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction. (4th ed., pp. 51–93). International Reading Association.

  • Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction. (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.

  • Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Scaffolded reading instruction of content-area texts. The Reading Teacher, 67(5), 347–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2015). Selecting texts and tasks for content area reading and learning. The Reading Teacher, 68(7), 524-529

  • Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2008). Shared readings: Modeling comprehension, vocabulary, text structures, and text features for older readers. The Reading Teacher, 61(7), 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.7.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2011). Assessment guide: A guide to benchmark assessment system 1. (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2012a). Guided reading: The romance and the reality. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2012b). The Fountas and Pinnell text level gradient: Revision to recommended grade-level goals. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halladay, J. L. (2012). Revisiting key assumptions of the reading level framework. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, E. H. (2013). Supporting students’ movement up the staircase of text complexity. The Reading Teacher, 66(6), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. V. (2017). What if “Just Right” is just wrong? The unintended consequences of levelling readers. The Reading Teacher, 71(3), 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. V., & Pearson, P. D. (2015). Teachers or programs? A historical perspective on where trust is placed in teaching reading. In P. D. Pearson & E. H. Hiebert (Eds.), Research-based practices for teaching common core literacy. (pp. 237–258). Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, S. (2013). Interactive read-alouds—An avenue for enhancing children’s language for thinking and understanding: A review of recent research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, L. M., & Schickedanz, J. A. (2007). Repeated interactive read-alouds in preschool and kindergarten. The Reading Teacher, 60(8), 742–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer, H. A. (2010). Textual scaffolds for developing fluency in beginning readers accuracy and reading rate in qualitatively leveled and decodable text. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802613450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practies and Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common Cores State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. http://corestandards.org/.

  • Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D. (2007). An endangered species act for literacy education. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 217–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, E. M., D’Agostino, J. V., Harmey, S. J., Kelly, R. H., & Brownfield, K. (2016). Examining the nature of scaffolding in an early literacy intervention. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routman, R. (2018). Literacy essentials. Heinemann.

  • Shanahan, T. (2015). Teaching with books at the students’ reading levels. [Reading Rockets Blogs about Reading]. Retrieved 14 July 2015 from http://www.readingrockets.org/blog/teaching-books-students-reading-levels.

  • Shanahan, T. (2017). Instructional level and teaching with complex texts [Web log post]. Retrieved 20 Dec 2018 from http://www.readingrockets.org/blogs/shanahan-literacy/instructional-level-and-teaching-complex-text.

  • Shanahan, T. (2018). Gradual release of responsibility and complex text [Web log post]. Retrieved 19 Jan 2019 from https://shanahanonliteracy.com/blog/gradual-release-of-responsibility-and-complex-text#sthash.qRgp5suh.dpbs.

  • Stahl, K. A. D. (2012). Complex text or frustration-level text: Using shared reading to bridge the difference. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., Massey, D., Goggans, M., & Flajole, K. (2019). Thirty-five years of the gradual release of responsibility: Scaffolding toward complex and responsive teaching. The Reading Teacher, 73(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P. (2015). Reading comprehension instruction: Moving into a new era. In P. D. Pearson & E. H. Hiebert (Eds.), Research-based practices for teaching common core literacy. (pp. 79–92). Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Literature Cited

  • Aliki. (1988). A weed is a flower: The life of George Washington Carver. Scholastic.

  • Bang, M. (1987). The paper crane. Greenwillow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Klassen, J. (2018). Extra yarn. Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (2018). Counting on Katherine: How Katherine Johnson saved Apollo 13. Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, H. D. (2020). Love is powerful. Candlewick Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buitrago, J., & Yockteng, R. (2019). Lion and mouse. Groundwood Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulla, C. R. (1960). A tree is a plant. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R. (1995). The tale of Ruby bridges. Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, B. (2000). Miss Rumphius. Puffin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatkoff, I., Hatkoff, C., & Kahumbu, P. (2006). Owen and Mzee: The true story of a remarkable friendship. Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkes, K. (1988). Chester’s way. Greenwillow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, E. J. (1962). The snowy day. Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, M. (2015). One plastic bag: Isatou Ceesay and the recycling women of the Gambia. Findaway World LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portis, A. (2020). Hey, Water! Scallywag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. (2005). Ish. Walker Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruurs, M. (2017). Birthdays around the world. Kids Can Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Professional Studies in Education, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA

    Julie W. Ankrum

Authors
  1. Julie W. Ankrum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie W. Ankrum.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ankrum, J.W. Complex Texts or Leveled Readers for the Primary Grades? Yes and Yes!. Early Childhood Educ J 50, 605–611 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01178-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01178-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation