Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Engaging Preschoolers with Critical Literacy Through Counter-Storytelling: A Qualitative Case Study

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the importance of traditional children’s literature in children’s literacy learning, little is still known about how fairytales can be effectively used for pedagogical purposes to facilitate young children’s critical participation in early literacy instruction. The main purpose of this article is to explore the intersection of literature-based instruction, multimodality, and early critical literacy pedagogies by examining how young children negotiate, represent, and (re)create their voices through engaging in counter-storytelling. The study was conducted at a kindergarten classroom located in a metropolitan city in South Korea. Using a qualitative case study method, multimodal data were collected for 5 months through classroom observations, one-to-one interviews with the parents and the teacher, observational field notes, and children’s artifacts. Findings suggest that it is important for teachers to value young children’s voices as storytellers and create a fluid and dynamic literacy atmosphere where young children explore their voice in exciting, intriguing, and multimodal ways. It also indicates that teachers need to encourage children to think critically and creatively through developmentally, culturally, and linguistically appropriate curricular activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The conversation was spoken in Korean originally but translated into English by a third person. The accuracy of the translation was checked through official Korean Translation Services.

  2. 112 is an emergency police phone number in Korea.

References

  • Albers, P., & Sanders, J. (Eds.). (2010). Literacies, the arts and multimodality. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, R. (1993). A teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, R., & Freedman, K. (1992). Responding as a cultural act: Adolescents’ responses to magazine ads and short stories. In J. Many & C. Cox (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding (pp. 162–190). Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. S. (2005). A place for critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(5), 394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Books, G. (2004). 잭과 콩나무 [Jack and the Beanstalk]. Seoul: Geylim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, W., & McNair, J. C. (2009). “But this story of mine is not unique”: A review of research on African American children's literature. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2008). Play is more than fun. TED Talk. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/stuart_brown_says_play_is_more_than_fun_it_s_vital#t-566747

  • Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, P. A., & Hade, D. H. (2000). Inside the picture, outside the page: Semiotics and the reading of wordless picturebooks. Journal of Research in Childhood Education., 15(1), 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, B. D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in the academy: The struggle over "legitimate" knowledge for faculty of color. Equity and Excellence in Education, 35(1), 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWaelsche, S. A. (2015). Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses. Linguistics and Education, 32, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disney Storybook Art. (2014). 신데렐라 [Cinderella]. Seoul: Dreaming Snail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, S. (2014). 5 Reasons why fairy tales are good for children. Retrieved from https://www.scottishbooktrust.com/blog/reading/2014/06/5-reasons-why-fairy-tales-are-good-for-children.

  • Dooley, C. M., & Matthews, M. W. (2009). Emergent comprehension: Understanding comprehension development among young literacy learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(3), 269–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, C., Johnston, P., & Rogers, R. (2006). Critical literacy/critical teaching: Tools for preparing responsive teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. H. (2008). Staying in the (curricular) lines: Practice constraints and possibilities in childhood writing. Written Communication, 25(1), 119–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enciso, P. (1997). Negotiating the meaning of difference: Talking back to multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A. O. Soter (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 13–41). New York, NY: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Contimuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practice in households, communities and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, J. (1993). Case study methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., & Weiss, M. (2005). Children tell stories. Teaching and using storytelling in the classroom. Katonah, NY: Richard C. Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hour, H. (2000). Dynamic aspect of fairy tales: Social and emotional competence through fairy tales. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(1), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. (2011). Reading “further and beyond the text': Student perspectives of critical literacy in EFL reading and writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2008). Multi-modal discourse across the curriculum. In M. Martin-Jones & A. De Mejia (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, discourse and education (pp. 357–367). New Jersey, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jikyungsa. (2006). 빨간 모자 [Little Red Riding Hood]. Seoul: Jikyungsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (2012). The joy of children’s literature. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. B. (2017). Welcoming Counter story in the primary literacy classroom. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 6(1) Article 4. Retrieved from: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=jctp

  • Kelly, L. B., & Moses, L. (2018). Children’s literature that sparks inferential discussion. Reading Teacher, 1, 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • KICCE (2013). Policy brief. Retrieved from https://kicce.re.kr/eng/newsletter_mail/pdf/201401_brief.pdf.

  • Kim, S. J. (2012). Critical literacy in East Asian literacy classrooms. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 11(1), 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. J. (2016). Opening up spaces for early critical literacy: Korean kindergarteners exploring diversity through multicultural books. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(2), 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. J. (2019). Children as creative authors: The possibilities of counter-storytelling with preschool children. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(2), 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. J., & Lee, J. (2012). Who gets the best grades at top universities? An exploratory analysis of institution-wide interviews with the highest achievers at a top Korean University. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(4), 665–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, C., Harste, J., & Huber, K. (2005). Out of the box: Critical literacy in a first-gradeclassroom. Language Arts, 82(5), 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenters, K., & Winters, K. (2013). Fracturing writing spaces: Multimodal storytelling ignites process writing. Reading Teacher, 67(3), 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, M., Leland, C., Harste, J., & Christensen, L. (2015). Creating critical classrooms: K-8 reading and writing with an edge. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. J. (2004). Brown plus 50 counter-storytelling: A critical race theory analysis of the “majoritarian achievement gap” story. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37, 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. (2016). Counter-storytelling through graphic life writing. Language Arts, 94(2), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2007). Life in school. Los Angeles, CA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, K. J. (2004). Creating zones of possibility for struggling readers: A study of one fourth graders’ shifting roles in literature discussions. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(4), 419–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Association. (2012). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator's guide to “the four Cs.” Retrieved from https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf.

  • Nodelman, P., & Reimer, M. (2003). The pleasures of children’s literature. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panca, I., Georgescub, A., & Zahariab, M. (2015). Why children should learn to tell stories in primary school? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 591–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaskan, T. S. (2014). 늑대가 들려주는 빨간모자 이야기[The story of Little Red Riding Hood: From the wolf’s perspective]. Seoul: Kids M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, L. (2000). The construction of literary understanding by first and second graders in oral response to picture storybook read-alouds. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 252–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, L. (2008). Storytime. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (2005). Multiple case study analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. K., & Apple, M. W. (2003). Democracy, technology and curriculum: lessons from the critical practices of Korean teachers. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), The state and the politics of knowledge (pp. 177–192). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, V. (2014). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtue, D. C., & Vogler, K. E. (2009). Pairing folktales with textbooks and nonfiction in teaching about culture. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 21(3), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood: Meaning Making and children’s drawing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, The University of Texas at El Paso, Education Bldg. Rm. 603, 500 W., El Paso, TX, 79968, USA

    So Jung Kim

  2. College of Education, The University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave., EDUC 601D, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA

    Alyse C. Hachey

Authors
  1. So Jung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alyse C. Hachey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to So Jung Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.J., Hachey, A.C. Engaging Preschoolers with Critical Literacy Through Counter-Storytelling: A Qualitative Case Study. Early Childhood Educ J 49, 633–646 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01089-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01089-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation