Skip to main content
Log in

Rubrics as a Tool in Writing Instruction: Effects on the Opinion Essays of First and Second Graders

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently-adopted standards call for more emphasis on writing in early elementary grades. Rubrics may assist students in attending to important characteristics of effective writing, but research data on their use in early childhood is lacking. This study explores the effects of rubric use on writing instruction of opinion paragraphs for 20 first grade students (9 female, 11 male; 11 Black, 4 White, 4 Hispanic, 1 Asian; 8 English Language Learners) and 12 second grade students (7 male, 5 female; 6 Black, 2 Hispanic, 2 Middle Eastern, 1 Asian, 1 White; 0 English Language Learners) from a low socio-economic Midwestern United States elementary school that was designated a School in Need of Assistance. The stratified-grouped, counterbalanced pretest-midpoint test-posttest study determined if providing a rubric and instructing students on how to use it, in addition to teaching writing mini-lessons regarding specific areas of the rubric, would improve student writing scores compared to the mini lessons alone. Also, data were collected on student attitudes throughout the study. The results indicated that providing instruction on the skills outlined by the rubric, paired with student access to the rubric, improved student writing scores with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.92). Although student attitude ratings did not show a significant difference between conditions, student-supplied reasons for those ratings indicated that initial use of a rubric promoted later positive attitudes toward writing and higher self-efficacy while using the rubric. The authors recommend rubric use in writing to assist students in remembering and self-monitoring important components of writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2006). Rubrics: Tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. Cell Biology Education-Life Sciences Education, 5, 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H. (2010). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practice Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L., Cooperman, N., & Storandt, B. (2013). Reading, writing, and rubrics. Journal of Staff Development, 34(4), 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, J., Chard, D., Cooks, J., Cooper, J., Gersten, R., Lipson, M., et al. (2012a). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt journeys: Teacher’s edition unit 6 for grade 1. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, J., Chard, D., Cooks, J., Cooper, J., Gersten, R., Lipson, M., et al. (2012b). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt journeys: Teacher’s edition for grade 2. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaglehole, V. (2014). Assessing writing using rubrics. Practically Primary, 19(2), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, J. F., Schatz, I. M., Rosenberg, B. A., & Coleman, S. T. (2000). Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report, 4(1/2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsawafy, W. S. M. S. (2012). The effect of using integrated instruction with evaluation through the use of performance tasks and rubrics on Arabic writing skills for fifth-grade students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(3), 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. P., Jolivette, K., & Boden, L. J. (2013). STOP and DARE: Self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing with elementary students with E/BD in a residential facility. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(3), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement for progress monitoring in math. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iowa Department of Education. (2014). District report: Iowa City Community School District. Retrieved from http://reports.educateiowa.gov

  • Mason, L. H., Kubina, R. M., & Hoover, T. (2011). Effects of quick writing instruction for high school students with emotional disturbances. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21, 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2014). Intensive instruction to improve writing for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Cuenca-Sanchez, Y., Irby, N., Mills, S., Mason, L., & Kubina, R. (2010). Persuading students with emotional disabilities to write: A design study. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Literacy and learning: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 23, pp. 237–268). Bingley: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. (2012). Educational research (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB). (2002). Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319.

  • Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Center for Educational Transformation at the University of Northern Iowa for generous support of this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey C. Rule.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bradford, K.L., Newland, A.C., Rule, A.C. et al. Rubrics as a Tool in Writing Instruction: Effects on the Opinion Essays of First and Second Graders. Early Childhood Educ J 44, 463–472 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0727-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0727-0

Keywords

Navigation