Skip to main content
Log in

How Does Ongoing Task-Focused Mathematics Professional Development Influence Elementary School Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Enacted Pedagogies?

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined how a task-focused, year-long mathematics professional development program influenced elementary school teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Participants completed 84 h of professional development over 13 months that were focused on exploring, modifying and implementing cognitively-demanding mathematical tasks. Using a multi-methods approach, teacher-participants completed pre- and post-measures of mathematical knowledge for teaching, teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics, and teachers’ self-reports of enacted instructional practices. Further, three teacher-participants were randomly selected to be observed 3 times over the course of the school year. Data analyses indicated that the professional development had a statistically significant positive impact on participants’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, use of student-centered instructional practices, and beliefs towards mathematics as a subject area. Further, the observed teachers enacted some high-level mathematical tasks and questions, but these were more visible at the end of the study compared to the beginning of the study. Implications for future work are also shared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA’s learner-centered psychological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sampler of psychological perspectives on learner-centered schools (pp. 33–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banilower, E. R., Boyd, S. E., Pasley, J. D., & Weiss, I. R. (2006). Lessons from a decade of mathematics and science reform: Capstone report for the local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher professional development in the United States and abroad. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service; Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Fennema, L., Carpenter, T., Franke, M., Levi, M., Jacobs, V., & Empson, S. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teachers and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Briman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, D. J., Banilower, E. R., Weiss, I. R., & Rosenberg, S. L. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2), 113–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J., & Parsons, R.M. (2010). Designing a successful system-wide professional development initiative in mathematics: The New Zealand numeracy development project. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Denver, CO.

  • Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. R., Wang, C., & Polly, D. (2013). Guiding teachers in the use of a standards-based mathematics curriculum: Perceptions and subsequent instructional practices after an intensive professional development program. School Science and Mathematics, 113(1), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT) (2000). Revisioning professional development: What learner-centered professional development looks like. Oxford, OH: NPEAT. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://www.nsdc.org/library/policy/npeat213.pdf.

  • Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D. (2006). Examining the influence of learner-centered professional development on elementary mathematics teachers’ instructional practices, espoused practices and evidence of student learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

  • Polly, D. (2008). Modeling the influence of calculator use and teacher effects on first grade students’ mathematics achievement. Journal of Technology in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D. (2011). Examining teachers’ enactment of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in their mathematics teaching after technology integration professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D. (2012). Supporting mathematics instruction with an expert coaching model. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2010). Reexamining technology’s role in learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., & Nasir, N. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal for Research in Teacher Education, 4, 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D., Bastable, V., & Russell, S. J. (2002). Developing mathematical ideas. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (1996). The QUASAR project: The “revolution of the possible” in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30(4), 476–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–370). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. (2006). Designing and using research instruments to describe the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers. Research in Education, 75, 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TERC. (2007). Investigations in number, data, and space (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2008). National mathematics advisory panel. Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC, Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved December 31, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drew Polly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polly, D., Neale, H. & Pugalee, D.K. How Does Ongoing Task-Focused Mathematics Professional Development Influence Elementary School Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Enacted Pedagogies?. Early Childhood Educ J 42, 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0585-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0585-6

Keywords

Navigation