Abstract
With the advent of Web 2.0, Vygotsky’s traditional role of the more knowledgeable other (MKO) has been transformed. This transformation shifts the power of a facilitator of learning from an elite group of MKOs to all students. Such a transformation possesses significant value in the early childhood mathematics classroom where collaboration is essential for student learning. This article reveals three distinct MKOs that have emerged from the WEB 2.0 expansion, and discusses three tools that usher collaboration and empower students in an early childhood mathematics classroom: Voki, VoiceThread, and Vodcasts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbeduto, L., & Hesketh, L. J. (1997). Pragmatic development in individuals with mental retardation: Learning to use language in social interactions. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3(4), 323–333.
American Psychological Association Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
An, Y. J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2011). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K-12 teacher beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
Andrews, S., & And, O. (1994). Alternative learning environments equal role changes for participants. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED376150.pdf.
Antonacci, D., DiBartolo, S., Edwards, N., Fritch, K., McMullen, B., & Murch-Shafer, R. (2008). The power of virtual worlds in education: A second life primer and resource for exploring the potential of virtual worlds to impact teaching and learning. Retrieved from ANGEL Learning Isle Steering Committee: http://www.angellearning.com/.../secondlife/downloads/The%20Power%20of%20Virtual%20Worlds%20in%20Education_0708.pdf.
Anttiroiko, A., & Savolainen, R. (2011). Towards library 2.0: The adoption of web 2.0 technologies in public libraries. Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services, 61(2), 87–99. doi:10.1515/libr.2011.008.
Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) and the World Organization for Early Childhood Education (OMEP). (2007). Global guidelines for early childhood education and care in the 21st century. Retrieved from www.acei.org.
Bagnato, S. J. (2007). Authentic assessment for early childhood intervention best practices: The Guilford school practitioner series. New York, NY: Guilford.
Banks, S. A. (2011). A historical analysis of attitudes toward the use of calculators in junior high and high school math classrooms in the united states since 1975. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Benford, S., Bederson, B., Akesson, K., Bayon, V., Druin, D., Hansson, P., et al. (2000). Designing storytelling technologies to encourage collaboration between young children. Preston, England: ACM press.
Berson, I. R. (2009). Here’s what we have to say! Podcasting in the early childhood classroom. Social Studies and The Young Learner, 21(4), 8–11.
Brunvand, S., & Byrd, S. (2011). Using VoiceThread to promote learning engagement and success for all students. Technology for Teaching and Learning, 43(4), 28–37.
Chen, W., & Looi, C. (2011). Active classroom participation in a Group Scribbles primary science classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 676–686.
Chung, Y., & Walsh, D. J. (2006). Constructing a joint story-writing space: The dynamics of young children’s collaboration at computers. Early Education and Development, 17(3), 373–420.
DEC/NAEYC. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Education International. (2012). The global economic crisis and its impact on education survey. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/learner-centered.pdfhttp://download.eiie.org/Docs/WebDepot/Report_of_the_EI_Survey_on_the_Impact_of_the_Global_Economic_Crisis_on_Education_en.pdf.
Essa, E. (2002). Introduction to early childhood education (4th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
Eunsook, H., & Davis, G. (2005). Kindergartners’ conversations in a computer-based technology classroom. Communication Education, 54(2), 118–135.
Falloon, G. (2010). Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 108–122.
Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem- solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157–169.
Gooch, K., & Saine, P. (2011). Integration of the visual arts and Web 2.0 technologies in the classroom. New England Reading Association Journal, 47(1), 92–100.
Harker, M., & Harker, D. (2007). Achieving deep learning with student teamwork: An exploratory investigation. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship Of Teaching, 1(1), 24–40.
Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2012). Trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Retrieved April 1, 2012 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/TIMSS2011_Frameworks-Chapter1.pdf.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. Eugene: ISTE. http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Smythe, T. (2009). The horizon report: 2009 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Kingery, J., Erdley, C., Marshall, K., Whitaker, K., & Reuter, T. (2010). Peer experiences of anxious and socially withdrawn youth: an integrative review of the developmental and clinical literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(1), 91–128.
Leaning, B., & Watson, T. (2006). From the inside looking out—an intensive interaction group for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(2), 103–109.
Liu, C., Liu, K., Wang, P., Chen, G., & Su, M. (2012). Applying tangible story avatars to enhance children’s collaborative storytelling. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(1), 39–51.
Lowe, K., Lee, L., Schibeci, R., Cummings, R., Phillips, R., & Lake, D. (2010). Learning objects and engagement of students in Australian and New Zealand schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 227–241.
Macy, M., & Bagnato, S. J. (2010). Keeping it “R-E-A-L” with authentic assessment. NHSA Dialog, 13(1), 1–20.
Martino, J. (2007). The avatar project: Connected but not engaged—the paradox of cyberspace. Retrieved April 1, 2012 from http://www.art.tafe.vu.edu.au/avatar/wp-content/uploads/AvatarLitReview-revision%202.doc.
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Ltd.
Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2010). Knowledge building and mathematics: Shifting the responsibility for knowledge advancement and engagement. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 441–465.
NAEYC. (2009). NAEYC standards for early childhood professional preparation programs. Position statement. www.naeyce.org/positionstatement/ppp.
Oblinger, D. (2008). Growing up with Google: What it means to education. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 3, 11–29.
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in The Schools, 25(3–4), 211–225.
Samuels, P. (2010). Motivating mathematics learning through an integrated technology enhanced learning environment. International Journal for Technology In Mathematics Education, 17(4), 197–203.
Saude, S. S., Carioca, V. V., Siraj-Blatchford, J. J., Sheridan, S. S., Genov, K. K., & Nuez, R. R. (2005). Kinderet: Developing training for early childhood educators in information and communications technology (ICT) in Bulgaria, England, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. International Journal of Early Years Education, 13(3), 265–287.
Scheideman, B. (1998). Relate-Create-Donate: A teaching/learning philosophy for the cyber generation. Computers & Education, 31, 25–39.
Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Zhu, C., & Deed, C. (2009). Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: the potential of bloom’s taxonomy as a labeling tool. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 165–172.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waits, B. K., & Demana, F. (2001). Calculators in mathematics teaching and learning: Past, present, and future. In M. J. Burke & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century (pp. 2–14). Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wang, F., Kinzie, M., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.
Wohlwend, K. E. (2010). A is for avatar: Young children in literacy 2.0 worlds and literacy 1.0 schools. Language Arts, 88(2), 144–152.
Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cicconi, M. Vygotsky Meets Technology: A Reinvention of Collaboration in the Early Childhood Mathematics Classroom. Early Childhood Educ J 42, 57–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0582-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0582-9