Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vygotsky Meets Technology: A Reinvention of Collaboration in the Early Childhood Mathematics Classroom

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the advent of Web 2.0, Vygotsky’s traditional role of the more knowledgeable other (MKO) has been transformed. This transformation shifts the power of a facilitator of learning from an elite group of MKOs to all students. Such a transformation possesses significant value in the early childhood mathematics classroom where collaboration is essential for student learning. This article reveals three distinct MKOs that have emerged from the WEB 2.0 expansion, and discusses three tools that usher collaboration and empower students in an early childhood mathematics classroom: Voki, VoiceThread, and Vodcasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbeduto, L., & Hesketh, L. J. (1997). Pragmatic development in individuals with mental retardation: Learning to use language in social interactions. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3(4), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, Y. J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2011). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K-12 teacher beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S., & And, O. (1994). Alternative learning environments equal role changes for participants. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED376150.pdf.

  • Antonacci, D., DiBartolo, S., Edwards, N., Fritch, K., McMullen, B., & Murch-Shafer, R. (2008). The power of virtual worlds in education: A second life primer and resource for exploring the potential of virtual worlds to impact teaching and learning. Retrieved from ANGEL Learning Isle Steering Committee: http://www.angellearning.com/.../secondlife/downloads/The%20Power%20of%20Virtual%20Worlds%20in%20Education_0708.pdf.

  • Anttiroiko, A., & Savolainen, R. (2011). Towards library 2.0: The adoption of web 2.0 technologies in public libraries. Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services, 61(2), 87–99. doi:10.1515/libr.2011.008.

  • Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) and the World Organization for Early Childhood Education (OMEP). (2007). Global guidelines for early childhood education and care in the 21st century. Retrieved from www.acei.org.

  • Bagnato, S. J. (2007). Authentic assessment for early childhood intervention best practices: The Guilford school practitioner series. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. A. (2011). A historical analysis of attitudes toward the use of calculators in junior high and high school math classrooms in the united states since 1975. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

  • Benford, S., Bederson, B., Akesson, K., Bayon, V., Druin, D., Hansson, P., et al. (2000). Designing storytelling technologies to encourage collaboration between young children. Preston, England: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berson, I. R. (2009). Here’s what we have to say! Podcasting in the early childhood classroom. Social Studies and The Young Learner, 21(4), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunvand, S., & Byrd, S. (2011). Using VoiceThread to promote learning engagement and success for all students. Technology for Teaching and Learning, 43(4), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Looi, C. (2011). Active classroom participation in a Group Scribbles primary science classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 676–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y., & Walsh, D. J. (2006). Constructing a joint story-writing space: The dynamics of young children’s collaboration at computers. Early Education and Development, 17(3), 373–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEC/NAEYC. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education International. (2012). The global economic crisis and its impact on education survey. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/learner-centered.pdfhttp://download.eiie.org/Docs/WebDepot/Report_of_the_EI_Survey_on_the_Impact_of_the_Global_Economic_Crisis_on_Education_en.pdf.

  • Essa, E. (2002). Introduction to early childhood education (4th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eunsook, H., & Davis, G. (2005). Kindergartners’ conversations in a computer-based technology classroom. Communication Education, 54(2), 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G. (2010). Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem- solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooch, K., & Saine, P. (2011). Integration of the visual arts and Web 2.0 technologies in the classroom. New England Reading Association Journal, 47(1), 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, M., & Harker, D. (2007). Achieving deep learning with student teamwork: An exploratory investigation. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship Of Teaching, 1(1), 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2012). Trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Retrieved April 1, 2012 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/TIMSS2011_Frameworks-Chapter1.pdf.

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. Eugene: ISTE. http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.

  • Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Smythe, T. (2009). The horizon report: 2009 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, J., Erdley, C., Marshall, K., Whitaker, K., & Reuter, T. (2010). Peer experiences of anxious and socially withdrawn youth: an integrative review of the developmental and clinical literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(1), 91–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaning, B., & Watson, T. (2006). From the inside looking out—an intensive interaction group for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(2), 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Liu, K., Wang, P., Chen, G., & Su, M. (2012). Applying tangible story avatars to enhance children’s collaborative storytelling. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., Lee, L., Schibeci, R., Cummings, R., Phillips, R., & Lake, D. (2010). Learning objects and engagement of students in Australian and New Zealand schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M., & Bagnato, S. J. (2010). Keeping it “R-E-A-L” with authentic assessment. NHSA Dialog, 13(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, J. (2007). The avatar project: Connected but not engagedthe paradox of cyberspace. Retrieved April 1, 2012 from http://www.art.tafe.vu.edu.au/avatar/wp-content/uploads/AvatarLitReview-revision%202.doc.

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2010). Knowledge building and mathematics: Shifting the responsibility for knowledge advancement and engagement. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 441–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAEYC. (2009). NAEYC standards for early childhood professional preparation programs. Position statement. www.naeyce.org/positionstatement/ppp.

  • Oblinger, D. (2008). Growing up with Google: What it means to education. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 3, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in The Schools, 25(3–4), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, P. (2010). Motivating mathematics learning through an integrated technology enhanced learning environment. International Journal for Technology In Mathematics Education, 17(4), 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saude, S. S., Carioca, V. V., Siraj-Blatchford, J. J., Sheridan, S. S., Genov, K. K., & Nuez, R. R. (2005). Kinderet: Developing training for early childhood educators in information and communications technology (ICT) in Bulgaria, England, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. International Journal of Early Years Education, 13(3), 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheideman, B. (1998). Relate-Create-Donate: A teaching/learning philosophy for the cyber generation. Computers & Education, 31, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Zhu, C., & Deed, C. (2009). Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: the potential of bloom’s taxonomy as a labeling tool. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waits, B. K., & Demana, F. (2001). Calculators in mathematics teaching and learning: Past, present, and future. In M. J. Burke & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century (pp. 2–14). Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Kinzie, M., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. (2010). A is for avatar: Young children in literacy 2.0 worlds and literacy 1.0 schools. Language Arts, 88(2), 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Cicconi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cicconi, M. Vygotsky Meets Technology: A Reinvention of Collaboration in the Early Childhood Mathematics Classroom. Early Childhood Educ J 42, 57–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0582-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0582-9

Keywords

Navigation