Skip to main content
Log in

A Professional Development Program to Improve Math Skills Among Preschool Children in Head Start

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on four-year-olds’ knowledge of mathematics by introducing professional development and center-based mathematics activities around four mathematical domains to early educators’ teaching in Head Start programs. Because of the need to provide necessary mathematical experiences to young children to improve their early understanding and skills and provide the foundation for future success in mathematics, we provided the treatment group of early educators with professional development and center-based activities to promote four critical areas in mathematics. By randomly selecting Head Start centers to participate as the treatment group or control group, we were able to examine the effects of the professional development and set of activities on preschool children’s knowledge over a six-month period. We found children in the treatment group were more fluent and flexible with number concepts, were better at solving contextual problems, and had better measurement and spatial abilities than children in the control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anghileri, J., Beishuizen, M., & Van Putten, K. (2002). From informal strategies to structured procedures: Mind the gap! Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., Hill, H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A., & Dowker, A. (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. (1981). The interaction between two instructional treatments of algebraic structures and spatial-visualization ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(5), 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M., Wheatley, G. H., & Talsma, G. (1982). The importance of spatial visualization and cognitive development for geometry learning in preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(5), 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beishuizen, M., & Anghileri, J. (1998). Which mental strategies in early number curriculum? A comparison of British ideas and Dutch views. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brendefur, J. L., & Strother, S. (Producer). (2010). Primary mathematics assessment.

  • Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, J. J., Flanagan, K. D., McPhee, C., & Park, J. (2007). Preschool: First findings from the third follow-up of the early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B) (NCES 2008-025). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.

  • Clements, D. H., & Bright, G. (Eds.). (2003). Learning and teaching measurement: 2003 yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Focal points: Pre-K to Kindergarten. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(6), 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., Wilson, D. C., & Sarama, J. (2004). Young children’s composition of geometric figures: A learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., Xiufeng, L., & Sarama, J. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The research-based early maths assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demby, A. (1997). Algebraic procedures used by 13-to-15-year olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(1), 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorman, L. M., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2009). Emergent modeling: Discrete graphs to support the understanding of change and velocity. Mathematics Education, 41, 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Behr, M. (Eds.). (1980). Individual differences and the learning of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. (2003). TEMA3: Test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it? Social Policy Report, 22(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & van Galen, F. (2003). Facts and algorithms as products of students’ own mathematical activity. In A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 114–122). Reston VA: National Council for Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Griffin, S. (2003). Laying the foundations for computational fluency in early childhood. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(6), 306–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. (2004). Teaching number sense. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. Handbook of educational psychology. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). London, England: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G., & Confrey, J. (Eds.). (1994). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (2000). Learner-centered professional development. Phi Delta Kappan: Research Bulletin, 27, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C. (1999). Teaching fractions: Fostering children’s own reasoning. Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12:1999 NCTM Yearbook (pp. 82–92). Reston, VA: NCTM.

  • Kamii, C., & Clark, F. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education Research Monograph No. 13. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W. (2005). Effect of GIS learning on spatial ability. Dissertation, Texas A&M University.

  • Lee, Y. S., Lembke, E., Moore, D., Ginsburg, H., & Pappas, S. (2007). Identifying technically adequate early mathematics measures Technical White Paper. Brooklyn, NY: Wireless Generation, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1989). The arithmetic connection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Jaslow, L., & Curtis, C. (2003). Developing an understanding of measurement in the elementary grades. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement (pp. 100–121). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills and proficiencies. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex differences. New York: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 306–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2010). Focus in prekindergarten: Teaching with curriculum focal points. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGA. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Mathematical thinking and problem solving. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I. S. (2005). Inclusion and applied behavior analysis: Mending fences and building bridges. In Heward et al. (Ed.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 239–251). Columbus, OH: Pearson.

  • Slavit, D. (1999). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(3), 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., & Madnani, J. K. (2004). Which way is the “best”? Students’ conceptions of optimal strategies for solving equations. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Toronto, Canada.

  • Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartre, A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I. (1997). Mental and written algorithms: Can the gap be bridged? In I. Thompson (Ed.), Teaching and learning early number (pp. 97–109). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

  • Watanabe, T. (2002). Representations in teaching and learning fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(8), 457–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, C. H., Stannard, L. L., & Ithel, J. (2001). Block play performance among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(2), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Brendefur.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brendefur, J., Strother, S., Thiede, K. et al. A Professional Development Program to Improve Math Skills Among Preschool Children in Head Start. Early Childhood Educ J 41, 187–195 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0543-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0543-8

Keywords

Navigation