Skip to main content
Log in

Any Letter for me? Relationships Between an Elementary School Letter Writing Program and Student Attitudes, Literacy Achievement, and Friendship Culture

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study involved the development, implementation, and assessment of a comprehensive schoolwide mailing program as a practical tool to communicate enthusiasm towards writing to children and actively engage them in letter writing. The author played the dual role of teacher-researcher and worked for one school year with one teacher from each grade level from grade 1 to grade 5. The objective of the study was to explore the relationship between an innovative mailing program and children’s attitudes towards letter writing. This study employed both qualitative (conference with teachers) and quantitative (survey) methods. The author initiated the study with a presentation to the teachers (during a staff meeting) and to the children (in an assembly), systematically collected feedback from teachers to assess the program throughout the year, informed parents (through school newsletters), and assessed children’s attitudes towards both writing and letter writing at the beginning and end of the program. It was anticipated that the program would provide children with authentic writing experiences, foster positive attitudes towards writing, enhance their literacy skills, and in turn strengthen a “friendship culture” in the school by being coparticipants as readers and writers in the letter writing process. Data analysis indicated that children enjoyed the responsive letter writing process and that their self-perceptions as writers and their writing skills improved. Results support the introduction of an elementary school mailing program as a means to cultivate and strengthen positive relationships between pupils and invite family participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barksdale, M. A., Watson, C., & Park, E. S. (2007). Pen pal letter exchanges: Taking first steps toward developing cultural understandings. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, C. (1997). The joy of letter writing. Sojourners, 26(6), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N. (1997). The ETS gender study: How females and males perform in educational settings. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. (1993). The social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enz, B. J. (2003). The ABCs of family literacy. In A. Debruin-Parecki & B. Krol-Sinclair (Eds.), Family literacy: From theory to practice (pp. 50–67). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiler, A., & Logan, E. (2007). The literacy early action project (LEAP): Exploring factors underpinning progress with literacy for a child in his first year of school. British Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 162–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes, J. (2008). Teaching writing in the early years of school. Practically Primary, 13(1), 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, P. (2004). The history and future of literacy. In T. Grainger (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in language and literacy (pp. 19–32). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. M. (1992). The untapped power of student note writing. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kear, D., Coffman, G., McKenna, M., & Ambrosio, A. (2000). Measuring attitude toward writing: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, J. E. (2002). Writing letters to support literacy. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 232–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, J. E. (2008). Please Mr. Postman. Practically Primary, 13(1), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P. (2002). Developing an E-pal partnership: A school-based international activity. Childhood Education, 79(2), 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, W. (1994). If this is the only letter I get this month you need to unplug your electronic surfboard. Booklist, 90(9), 790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, J. (1992). Active voice: A writing program across the curriculum (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newkirk, T. (2002). Misreading masculinity: Speculations on the great gender gap in writing. In S. Bailey (Ed.), Gender in education (pp. 314–327). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. (2000). Fourth, sixth, and eigth graders’ preferred writing topics and identification of gender markers in stories. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risinger, C. F. (2007). Crossing borders and building bridges using the internet. Social Education, 71(7), 380–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, C. L. (1992). The motivation to read and write. In J. W. Irwin & M. A. Doyle (Eds.), Reading/writing connections: Learning from research (pp. 177–201). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental function. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Dr. Liz Brooker for advice and suggestions on revisions to earlier drafts of the paper and Dr. Mary-Louise Vanderlee for consultation. A heartfelt thank you to Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and Vaheguru Ji for ongoing guidance and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukhdeep Kaur Chohan.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Feedback Provided by Teachers in Conferences

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chohan, S.K. Any Letter for me? Relationships Between an Elementary School Letter Writing Program and Student Attitudes, Literacy Achievement, and Friendship Culture. Early Childhood Educ J 39, 39–50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0438-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0438-5

Keywords

Navigation