Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to describe the nature of imaginary play in Montessori classrooms. A transcript from a train ride shows how young children imagine and recreate ideas from their real world experiences and weave them into original new accounts. The author discusses how the play-like action of dramatizing The Caboose Who Got Loose is highly motivating for young children. An informal analysis provides the reader with important insights into the way children see and think about the world. The play episode observed in this study appears as a microcosm of the larger Montessori culture, reflecting the spirit of kindness and respect that permeates Montessori Schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chattin-McNichols, J. (1992). The Montessori controversy. Albany, NY: Delmar.
Honig, A. S. (2006). What infants, toddlers, and preschoolers learn from play: 12 ideas. Montessori Life, 18(1), 16–21.
Montessori, M. (1965). Spontaneous activity in education. New York: Schocken.
Ohlhaver, D. (2001). Preludes to writing in early childhood. Montessori Life, 13(4), 35–38.
Peet, B. (1971). The Caboose who got loose. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Roopnarine, J. L., Shin, M., Donovan, B., & Suppal, P. (2000). Sociocultural contexts of dramatic play: Implication for early education. In K. A. Roskos & J. F. Christie (Eds.), Play and literacy in early childhood: Research from multiple perspectives (pp. 205–220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Spencer, M. M. (2003). What more needs saying about imagination? Reading Teacher, 57(1), 105–111.
Stegelin, D. A. (2005). Making the case for play policy: Research-based reasons to support play-based environments. Young Children, 60, 76–85.
Torrence, M. (1992). Montessori and play: Theory vs. practice. Montessori Life, 13(4), 36–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soundy, C.S. Young Children’s Imaginative Play: Is It Valued in Montessori Classrooms?. Early Childhood Educ J 36, 381–383 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0282-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0282-z