Abstract
Freshwater lake soundscapes yield crucial information regarding biological, geological, and anthropogenic activity, yet is a relatively unexplored area of study. These soundscapes are particularly important to aquatic life that may use sound to navigate, find food, avoid predators, and communicate. Further research is required to understand how aquatic species, such as native fishes, are impacted by increased anthropogenic interference. Many wilderness lakes restrict the use of motorized boats and equipment, providing an opportunity to compare fish behavior in the presence and absence of anthropogenic sound. Underwater videos and passive acoustic monitoring were used to evaluate fish behavior under different soundscapes in the upper Midwest United States: John Lake (nonmotorized, Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, MN), Rush Lake (nonmotorized, Huron Mountain Club, MI), and Caribou Lake (motorized, Duluth, MN). Intermittent short and long anthropogenic sound playback experiments showed behavioral changes in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus, centrarchids), bluntnose minnows (Pimephales notatus, cyprinids), mimic shiners (Notropis volucellus, cyprinids), and yellow perch (Perca flavescens, percids). Overall, cyprinids in wilderness lakes were the most responsive to boat sound 36–52 dB above ambient sound levels, with bluegills in the public lake more likely to remain in the area during longer duration sound stimuli. Taken together, these results indicate that behavioral responses are species specific and depend on environmental variables such as anthropogenic exposure and fishing pressure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available via online repository when manuscript is accepted and published.
Code availability
Code will be made available via online repository when manuscript is accepted and published.
References
Ainslie MA (2010) Principles of sonar performance modelling. Springer, Heidelberg
Arthington AH, Dulvy NK, Gladstone W, Winfield IJ (2016) Fish conservation in freshwater and marine realms: status, threats and management. Aquat Conserv: Mar and Freshw Ecosys 26:838–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2712
Benhaïm D, Péan S, Lucas G, Blanc N, Chatain B, Bégout ML (2012) Early life behavioural differences in wild caught and domesticated sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Appl Anim Behav Sci 141:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.07.002
Bolgan M, Chorazyczewska E, Winfield I, Codarin A, O’Brien J, Gammell M (2016) First observations of anthropogenic underwater noise in a large multi-use lake. J Limnol. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2015.1405
Boom B, He J, Palazzo S, Huang P, Beyan C, Chou HM, Lin FP, Spampinato C, Fisher R (2014) A research tool for long-term and continuous analysis of fish assemblage in coral-reefs using underwater camera footage. Ecol Inform 23:83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.10.006
Bruintjes R, Radford AN (2013) Context-dependent impacts of anthropogenic noise on individual and social behaviour in a cooperatively breeding fish. Anim Behav 85(6):1343–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.025
Cappo M, Harvey E, Malcolm H, Speare P (2003) Potential of video techniques to monitor diversity, abundance and size of fish in studies of marine protected areas. Aquat Prot Areas-what works best and how do we know 1:455–464
Castañeda RA, Van Nynatten A, Crookes S, Ellender BR, Heath DD, MacIsaac HJ, Mandrak NE, Weyl OLF (2020) Detecting native freshwater fishes using novel non-invasive methods. Front Environ Sci 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00029
Cotter AJR (2008) The “soundscape” of the sea, underwater navigation, and why we should be listening more. Adv Fish Sci 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302653.ch19
Duncan AJ, Lucke K, Erbe C, McCauley RD (2016) Issues associated with sound exposure experiments in tanks. Proc Meet on Acoust 27:070008. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000280
Fay R (2009) Soundscapes and the sense of hearing of fishes. Integr Zool 4:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00132.x
Fay RR, Popper AN (1974) Acoustic stimulation of the ear of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Exp Biol 61:243–260
French B, Wilson S, Holmes T, Kendrick A, Rule M, Ryan N (2021) Comparing five methods for quantifying abundance and diversity of fish assemblages in seagrass habitat. Ecol Indic 124:107415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107415
Gorski PR, Lathrop RC, Hill SD, Herrin RT (1999) Temporal mercury dynamics and diet composition in the mimic shiner. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:701–712. https://doi.org/10.1577/15488659(1999)128%3c0701:TMDADC%3e2.0.CO;2
Hawkins AD, MacLennan DN (1976) An acoustic tank for hearing studies on fish. In: Schuijf A Hawkins AD (ed) Sound reception in fish, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 149–170
Hawkins AD, Roberts L, Cheesman S (2014) Responses of free-living coastal pelagic fish to impulsive sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 135:3101–3116. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4870697
Jacobsen L, Baktoft H, Jepsen N, Aarestrup K, Berg S, Skov C (2014) Effect of boat noise and angling on lake fish behaviour. J Fish Biol 84:1768–1780. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12395
Johansson K, Sigray P, Backström T, Magnhagen C (2016) Stress response and habituation to motorboat noise in two coastal fish species in the Bothnian Sea. In: Popper, A. Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_62
Koehn JD, Hobday AJ, Pratchett MS, Gillanders BM (2011) Climate change and Australian marine and freshwater environments, fishes and fisheries: synthesis and options for adaptation. Mar Freshw Res 62:1148. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF11139
Kuehne LM, Padgham BL, Olden JD (2013) The soundscapes of lakes across an urbanization gradient. PLoS ONE 8:e55661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055661
Magnhagen C, Johansson K, Sigray P (2017) Effects of motorboat noise on foraging behaviour in Eurasian perch and roach: a field experiment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 564:115–125. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11997
Mensinger AF, Putland RL, Radford CA (2016) The use of baited underwater video to monitor fish behavior in response to boat motor noise. Proc Meet Acoust 27:010002. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000234
Mensinger AF, Putland RL, Radford CA (2018) The effect of motorboat sound on Australian snapper Pagrus auratus inside and outside a marine reserve. Ecol Evol 8:6438–6448. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4002
Mickle MF, Higgs DM (2017) Integrating techniques: A review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0245
Nunes JACC, Costa Y, Blumstein DT, Leduc AOHC, Dorea AC, Benevides LJ, Sampaio CLS, Barros F (2018) Global trends on reef fishes’ ecology of fear: flight initiation distance for conservation. Mar Environ Res 136:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.02.011
Oldfield RG (2011) Aggression and welfare in a common aquarium fish, the Midas cichlid. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 14:340–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2011.600664
Pieniazek RH, Mickle MF, Higgs DM (2020) Comparative analysis of noise effects on wild and captive freshwater fish behaviour. Anim Behav 168:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.004
Poggendorf D (1952) Die absoluten Hörschwellen des Zwergwelses (Amiurus nebulosus) und Beiträge zur Physik des Weberschen Apparates der Ostariophysen. Zeits Vgl Phys 34:222–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298202
Pratchett MS, Bay LK, Gehrke PC, Koehn JD, Osborne K, Pressey RL, Sweatman HPA, Wachenfeld D (2011) Contribution of climate change to degradation and loss of critical fish habitats in Australian marine and freshwater environments. Mar Freshw Res 62:1062. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF10303
Poikane S, Ritterbusch D, Argillier C, Białokoz W, Blabolil P, Breine J, Jaarsma NG, Krause T, Kubečka J, Lauridsen TL, Nõges P, Peirson G, Virbickas T (2017) Response of fish communities to multiple pressures: development of a total anthropogenic pressure intensity index. Sci Total Environ 586:502–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.211
Popper AN, Fay RR (2011) Rethinking sound detection by fishes. Hear Res 273:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.12.023
Popper AN, Fewtrell J, Smith ME, McCauley RD (2003) Anthropogenic sound: effects on the behavior and physiology of fishes. Mar Tech Soc J 37(4):35–40. https://doi.org/10.4031/002533203787537050
Popper AN, Hastings MC (2009) The effects of human-generated sound on fish. Integr Zool 4:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00134.x
Popper AN, Hawkins AD (2019) An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes. J Fish Biol 94:692–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13948
Popper AN, Smith ME, Cott PA, Hanna BW, MacGillivray AO, Austin ME, Mann DA (2005) Effects of exposure to seismic airgun use on hearing of three fish species. J Acoust Soc Am 117:3958–3971. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1904386
Putland RL, Mackiewicz AG, Mensinger AF (2018) Localizing individual soniferous fish using passive acoustic monitoring. Ecol Inform 48:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.08.004
Putland RL, Mensinger AF (2020) Exploring the soundscape of small freshwater lakes. Ecol Inform 55:101018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.101018
Radford AN, Kerridge E, Simpson SD (2014) Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise? Behav Ecol 25:1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru029
Rogers PH, Cox M (1988) Underwater sound as biological stimulus. Sens Biol Aquat Anim. Springer, New York, NY. 131–149
Rountree RA, Juanes F, Bolgan M (2018) Air movement sound production by alewife, white sucker, and four salmonid fishes suggests the phenomenon is widespread among freshwater fishes. PLoS ONE 13:e0204247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204247
Rountree RA, Juanes F, Bolgan M (2020) Temperate freshwater soundscapes: a cacophony of undescribed biological sounds now threatened by anthropogenic noise. PLoS ONE 15:e0221842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221842
Scholik AR, Yan HY (2001) Effects of underwater noise on auditory sensitivity of a cyprinid fish. Hear Res 152:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00213-6
Scholik AR, Yan HY (2002a) Effects of boat engine noise on the auditory sensitivity of the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Environ Biol Fish 63:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014266531390
Scholik AR, Yan HY (2002b) The effects of noise on the auditory sensitivity of the bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Comp Biochem Physiol Part a: Molec Integr Physiol 133:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00108-3
Schramm MP, Bevelhimer M, Scherelis C (2017) Effects of hydrokinetic turbine sound on the behavior of four species of fish within an experimental mesocosm. Fish Res 190:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.01.012
Schulz-Mirbach T, Ladich F, Plath M, Heß M (2019) Enigmatic ear stones: what we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths. Biol Rev 94:457–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12463
Smith ME, Kane AS, Popper AN (2004) Acoustical stress and hearing sensitivity in fishes: does the linear threshold shift hypothesis hold water? J Exp Biol 207:3591–3602. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01188
Tavolga WN (1976) Sound reception in fishes. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsberg
Tindle CT, Deane GB (2005) Shallow water sound propagation with surface waves. J Acoust Soc Am 117:2783–2794. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1883368
Urick RJ (1983) Principles of Underwater Sound. McGraw-Hill, New York
Vetter BJ, Murchy KA, Cupp AR, Amberg JJ, Gaikowski MP, Mensinger AF (2017) Acoustic deterrence of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) to a broadband sound stimulus. J Gt Lakes Res 43:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.11.009
Watson DL, Harvey ES, Anderson MJ, Kendrick GA (2005) A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Mar Biol 148:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0090-6
Willis TJ, Babcock RC (2000) A baited underwater video system for the determination of relative density of carnivorous reef fish. Mar Freshw Res 51:755–763. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF00010
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank M Mensinger, S Fleissner, and A Fleissner for their assistance during field work. We would also like to thank L Hall and N Michels for their help and guidance during video analysis.
Funding
Funding was provided to ERF by the Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation Research grant and was supported by the University of Minnesota Duluth Biology Department. Additional funding was provided by a Mistletoe Research Fellowship awarded to RLP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors designed the experiments. ERF and RLP contributed to the data collection. Video and statistical analysis was completed by ERF. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All applicable institutional guidelines for the observation of animals in the wild were followed.
Consent to participate
The authors declare that they consented to participate in this study.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they consent to publication of this study and its findings.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fleissner, E.R., Putland, R.L. & Mensinger, A.F. The effect of boat sound on freshwater fish behavior in public (motorized) and wilderness (nonmotorized) lakes. Environ Biol Fish 105, 1065–1079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01318-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01318-5