Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predatory fish species as indicators of biodiversity: their distribution in environmental gradients in small and mid-sized rivers in Eastern Europe

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied predatory fish species in relation to the biodiversity of fish assemblages and environmental variables at 511 sites in small and mid-sized rivers at the eastern edge of the European continent. The studied region has a high geographical and environmental heterogeneity. The impact of environmental factors on species occurrence was analyzed with generalized linear models. The main influential environmental factors on the occurrence of predatory fish species were elevation and the width and depth of the river. For the first time for a large area of Eastern Europe, optimum points and niche breadths for predatory fish species along width, depth, and velocity gradients were estimated. The width of the ecological niche can vary significantly both between different species of fish and within the same species for certain factors. Our results identify the bioindicative potential of predatory fish species in river ecosystems in this, sometimes overlooked, the eastern part of the continent. We found that the probabilities of occurrence of pike, burbot, pikeperch, and asp were close to zero when the Shannon index was less than 1 and the number of fish species was less than 5. The probability of occurrences of perch was 100% if the number of fish species in the site was more than 15.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abell R, Thieme M, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N et al (2008) Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58(5):403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askeyev A, Askeyev O, Yanybaev N, Askeyev I, Monakhov S, Marić S, Hulsman K (2017) River fish assemblages along an elevation gradient in the eastern extremity of Europe. Environ Biol Fish 100:585–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askeyev A, Askeyev O, Askeyev I (2019) Owls as bioindicators: their spatial and temporal aspects in Eastern Europe. Eur J Ecol 5(2):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askeyev O, Askeyev I, Askeyev A, Monakhov S, Yanybaev N (2015) River fish assemblages in relation to environmental factors in the eastern extremity of Europe (Tatarstan Republic, Russia). Environ Biol Fish 98:1277–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askeyev O, Askeyev A, Askeyev I (2020) Rapid climate change has increased post-breeding and autumn bird density at the eastern limit of Europe. Ecol Res 35(1):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas of the Republic of Tatarstan edited by Minnikhanov (2005) Moscow: production cartographic association “cartography” (in Russian)

  • Birzaks J (2012) Occurrence, abundance and biomass of fish in rivers of Latvia in accordance with river typology. Zool Ecol 22(1):9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosveld J, Kranenberg J, Lenders H (2015) Historic decline and recent increase Burbot (Lota lota) in the Netherlands. Hydrobiology 757:49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brazner JC, Tanner DK, Detenbeck NE, Batterman SL, Stark SL, Jagger LA, Snarski VM (2005) Regional, watershed, and site-specific environmental influences on fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior tributaries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1254–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes A, Gregory K, Dawson FH (1983) An assessment of river channelization in England and Wales. Sci Total Environ 27(2):97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buisson L, Blanc L, Grenouillet G (2008) Modelling stream fish species distribution in a river network: the relative effects of temperature versus physical factors. Ecol Freshw Fish 17:244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buisson L, Grenouillet G, Villéger S, Canal J, Laffaille P (2013) Toward a loss of functional diversity in stream fish assemblages under climate change. Glob Change Biol 19(3):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart S, Walpole M, Collen B, Van Strien A et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comte L, Grenouillet G (2013) Do stream fish track climate change? Assessing distribution shifts in recent decades. Ecography 36:1236–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussling U, Berg R, Klinger H, Wolter C (2004) Assessing the ecological status of river systems using fish assemblages. In: Steinberg C, Calmano W, Klapper H, Wilken RD (eds) Handbuch angewandte limnologie. Ecomed Verlagsgruppe, Landsberg, pp 1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • FAME CONSORTIUM (2004) Manual for the application of the European Fish Index - EFI. A fish-based method to assess the ecological status of European rivers in support of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.1, January 2005

  • Fieseler C, Wolter C (2006) A fish-based typology of small temperate rivers in the northestern lowlands of Germany. Limnologica 36:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory K (2006) The human role in changing river channels. Geomorphology 79:172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenouillet G, Roset N, Goffaux D, Breine J, Simoens I, De Leeuw J, Kestemont P (2007) Fish assemblages in European Western Highlands and Western Plains: a type-specific approach to assess ecological quality of running waters. Fish Manag Ecol 14(6):509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huet M (1959) Profiles and biology of western European streams as related to fish management. Trans Am Fish Soc 88(3):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempinger JJ, Carline RF (1977) Dynamics of the walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) population in Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin, 1955–72. J Fish Res Board Can 34(10):1800–1811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesminas V, Virbickas T (2000) Application of an adapted index of biotic integrity to rivers of Lithuania. Hydrobiologia 422:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotegov B (2006) Fauna and ecology of fish in small rivers of Udmurtia. Izhevsk (in Russian)

  • Kuznetsov V (2005) Fish of the Volga-Kama region. Kazan (in Russian)

  • Logez M, Bady P, Pont D (2012) Modelling the habitat requirement of riverine fish species at the European scale: sensitivity to temperature and precipitation and associated uncertainty. Ecol Freshw Fish 21(2):266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk S, Pivnicka K (2009) Fish assemblages in the Czech Republic - species saturation. Frequency and changes along the longitudinal stream gradient. Acta Universitatis Environmentalica 1:45–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Maire A, Laffaille P, Maire J, Buisson L (2016) Identification of priority areas for the conservation of stream fish assemblages: implications for river management in France. River Res Appl 33:524–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maire A, Thierry E, Viechtbauer W, Daufresne M (2019) Poleward shift in large-river fish communities detected with a novel meta-analysis framework. Freshw Biol 64(6):1143–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marić S, Askeyev I, Askeyev O, Monakhov S, Bravničar J, Snoj A (2014a) Phylogenetic and population genetic analysis of Thymallus thymallus (Actinopterygii, Salmonidae) from the middle Volga and upper Ural drainages. Hydrobiologia 740(1):167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marić S, Alekseyev S, Snoj A, Askeyev O, Askeyev I, Weiss S (2014b) First mtDNA sequencing of Volga and Ob basin taimen Hucho taimen: European populations stem from a late Pleistocene expansion of H. taimen out of western Siberia and are not intermediate to Hucho hucho. J Fish Biol 85(2):530–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marić S, Askeyev O, Askeyev A, Monakhov S, Yanybaev N, Askeyev I, Galimova D, Snoj A (2016) Lack of mtDNA variation among remote middle Volga and upper Ural brown trout suggests recent and rapid recolonization. J Appl Ichthyol 32(5):948–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makeeva AP, Pavlov DS, Pavlov DA (2011) Atlas of juveniles of freshwater fish of Russia. Partnerships of scientific publications KMK (in Russian), Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland P, Linsell K (2009) Atlas of Fishes (a guide to freshwater fish species in Europe), translated and supplemented by V Sideleva. Amphora, St. Petersburg (In Russian)

  • Matthews W (1998) Patterns in freshwater fish ecology. Chapman and Hall, Norwell

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGill B (2010) Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13(5):627–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponomarev V, Loskutova O (2020) Effect of elevation gradient on the structure of aquatic communities in the Vangyr River Basin, the Subpolar Urals. Russ J Ecol 51:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pont D, Hugueny B, Oberdorff T (2005) Modelling habitat requirement of European fishes: do species have similar responses to local and regional environmental constraints? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62(1):163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radinger J, Wolter C, Kail J (2015) Spatial scaling of environmental variables improves species-habitat models of fishes in a small, sand-bed lowland river. PloS ONE 10(11):e0142813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyjol Y, Hugueny B, Pont D, Bianco P, Beier U, Caiola N, Casals F, Cowx I, Economou A, Ferreira T, Haidvogl G, Noble R, De Sostoa A, Vigneron T, Virbickas T (2007) Patterns in species richness and endemism of European freshwater fish. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribbink AJ (1987) African lakes and their fishes: conservation scenarios and suggestions. Environ Biol Fish 19(1):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riha M, Kubečka J, Vašek M et al (2009) Long-term development of fish populations in the Římov Reservoir. Fish Manag Ecol 16(2):121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rincon PA, Velasco JC, Gonzalez-Sanchez N, Pollo C (1990) Fish assemblages in small streams in western Spain: the influence of an introduced predator. Arch Hydrobiol 118(1):81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzsky MD (1887) Sviyaga basin and its fish. Proceedings of the Society of Naturalists at Kazan University. V.17 (in Russian)

  • Saly P, Takacs P, Kiss I, Biro P, Eros T (2011) The relative influence of spatial context and catchment and site-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages in a human-modified landscape. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoul F, Cayrou J, Mastrorillo S, Cereghino R (2005) Spatial patterns of the biological traits of freshwater fish communities in south-west France. J Fish Biol 66(2):301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla P, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E et al (2019) IPCC, 2019: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.

  • Stapanian M, Paragamian V, Madenjian C, Jackson J, Lappalainen J, Evenson M, Neufeld M (2010) Worldwide status of burbot and conservation measures. Fish Fish 11:34–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C, van Dam H (1989) Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. Hydrobiologia 178:209–223

  • Varpakhovsky NA (1886) Sketch of the ichthyological fauna of Kazanskaya province. Zap. Imper. Academy of Sciences V.52 (in Russian)

  • Worthington T, Van Houdt J, Hull J, Kemp P (2017) Thermal refugia and the survival of species in changing environments: new evidence from a nationally extinct freshwater fish. Ecol Freshw Fish 26(3):415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Tim Sparks for revising the English of the early drafts of the manuscript. We also thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA participated in all the data collection and wrote the methods, results, and discussion. OA led the data collection, designed and developed the manuscript structure, and wrote the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. IA participated in all fieldwork, manuscript structure, and language edits and contributed to results and discussion. SM participated in all data collection, created the figures, and contributed to results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleg Askeyev.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

We declare that the fish were caught and preserved under a survey permit of the Russian Federal Agency for Fisheries. After fieldwork, ≥ 90% of fish were returned to the water. This article does not contain any studies with human participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Askeyev, A., Askeyev, O., Askeyev, I. et al. Predatory fish species as indicators of biodiversity: their distribution in environmental gradients in small and mid-sized rivers in Eastern Europe. Environ Biol Fish 104, 767–778 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01113-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01113-8

Keywords

Navigation