Abstract
Brook trout feed primarily on prey items for which they have developed a search image. Periodically, fish are required to update their search images to match temporal variability in prey abundance. It is currently unknown how brook trout develop search images, but there is evidence to suggest that it could be influenced by social learning, wherein a fish learns a novel behavior through observation alone. Here we demonstrate that adult brook trout use social learning to quickly develop search images for novel prey. We trained a set of demonstrators to develop a search image for canned mealworms and subsequently moved demonstrators to treatment pools that contained naïve bystanders. We also had control pools that contained naïve bystanders and sham demonstrators that had not been trained on mealworms. Over an 8-day period, bystanders in treatment pools consumed 68 % of mealworms, compared to only 36 % in control pools. Moreover, social learning of search images was rapid as bystanders in treatment pools began feeding on mealworms in less than 1 day, whereas it took 7 days for bystanders in control pools to feed heavily on mealworms. Social learning of search images confers an adaptive advantage by reducing energetic costs of foraging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan JD (1981) Determinants of diet of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in a mountain stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:184–192. doi:10.1139/f81-024
Bannon E, Ringler NH (1986) Optimal prey size for stream resident brown trout (Salmo trutta): tests of predictive models. Can J Zool 64:704–713. doi:10.1139/z86-104
Brown C, Laland KN (2001) Social learning and life skills training for hatchery reared fish. J Fish Biol 59:471–493. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02354.x
Brown C, Laland KN (2003) Social learning in fishes: a review. Fish Fish 4:280–288. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00122.x
Brown C, Laland K, Krause K (2011) Fish cognition and behavior, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
Elliott JM (1973) The food of brown and rainbow trout (Salmo trutta and S. gairdneri) in relation to the abundance of drifting invertebrates in a mountain stream. Oecologia 12:329–347. doi:10.1007/BF00345047
Ensign WE, Strange SJ, Moore SE (1990) Summer food limitation reduces brook and rainbow trout biomass in a southern Appalachian stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 199:894–901. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1990)119<0894:SFLRBA>2.3.CO;2
Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression. 2nd edn. Sage
Galef BG, Laland KN (2005) Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. BioScience 55:489–499. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0489:SLIAES]2.0.CO;2
Gowan C (2007) Short-term cues used by foraging trout in a California stream. Environ Biol Fish 78:317–331. doi:10.1007/s10641-006-9099-z
Gowan C, Fausch KD (1996) Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: re-evaluating the concept of restricted movement. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1370–1381. doi:10.1139/f96-058
Gowan C, Fausch KD (2002) Why do foraging stream salmonids move during summer? Environ Biol Fish 64:139–153. doi:10.1023/A:1016010723609
Griffin AS (2004) Social learning about predators: a review and prospectus. Anim Learn Behav 32:131–140. doi:10.3758/BF03196014
Grosenick L, Clement TS, Fernald RD (2007) Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 445:429–432. doi:10.1038/nature05511
Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J (2006) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15:1–11
Hudy M, Coombs JA, Nislow KH, Letcher BH (2010) Dispersal and within-stream spatial population structure of brook trout revealed by pedigree reconstruction analysis. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:1276–1287. doi:10.1577/T10-027.1
Hughes RN, Kaiser MJ, Mackney PA, Warburton K (1992) Optimizing foraging behaviour through learning. J Fish Biol 41:77–91. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb03870.x
Johnson RL, Coghlan SM, Harmon T (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in prey selection of brown trout in a cold Arkansas tailwater. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:373–384. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00230.x
Kelley JL, Magurran AE (2003) Learned predator recognition and antipredator responses in fishes. Fish Fish 4:216–226. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00126.x
Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32:4–14. doi:10.3758/BF03196002
Laland KN, Brown C, Krause J (2003) Learning in fishes: from three-second memory to culture. Fish Fish 4:199–202. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00124.x
Liang K, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
Magnhagen C, Staffan F (2003) Social learning in young-of-the-year perch encountering a novel food type. J Fish Biol 63:824–829. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00189.x
Oliveira RF (2012) Social plasticity in fish: integrating mechanisms and function. J Fish Biol 81:2127–2150. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03477.x
Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515
R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org/
Railsback SF, Harvey BC (2002) Analysis of habitat-selection rules using an individual-based model. Ecology 83:1817–1830. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1817:AOHSRU]2.0.CO;2
Railsback SF, Lamberson RH, Harvey BC, Duffy WE (1999) Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecol Model 123:73–89. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00124-6
Reader SM, Kendal JR, Laland KN (2003) Social learning of foraging sites and escape routes in wild Trinidadian guppies. Anim Behav 66:729–739. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2252
Ringler NH (1979) Selective predation by drift-feeding brown trout (Salmo trutta). J Fish Res Board Can 36:392–403. doi:10.1139/f79-059
Suboksi MD, Templeton JJ (1989) Life skills training for hatchery fish: social learning and survival. Fish Res 7:343–352. doi:10.1016/0165-7836(89)90066-0
Sundström LF, Johnsson JI (2001) Experience and social environment influence the ability of young brown trout to forage on live novel prey. Anim Behav 61:249–255. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1593
Syrjänen J, Korsu K, Louhi P, Paavola R, Muotka T (2011) Stream salmonids as opportunistic foragers: the importance of terrestrial invertebrates along a stream-size gradient. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:2146–2156. doi:10.1139/f2011-118
Utz RM, Hartman KJ (2009) Density-dependent individual growth and size dynamics of central Appalachian brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:1072–1080. doi:10.1139/F09-063
Warburton K, Hughes R (2011) Learning of foraging skills by fish. In: Brown C, Laland K, Krause K (eds) Fish cognition and behavior, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 10–29
Ward AJW, Krause J, Sumpter DJT (2012) Quorum decision-making in foraging fish shoals. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032411
Ware DM (1971) Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the effect of experience. J Fish Res Board Can 28:1847–1852. doi:10.1139/f71-279
Webster MM, Laland KN (2012) Social information, conformity and the opportunity costs paid by foraging fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:797–809. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1328-1
White SL, Gowan C (2013) Brook trout use individual recognition and transitive inference to determine social rank. Behav Ecol 24:63–69. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars136
Acknowledgments
This project was funding by the Schaprio Undergraduate Research Fellowship at Randolph-Macon College. It was conducted according the College’s Animal Care and Use Protocol. Special thanks to Josh Harris for assistance in the field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
White, S.L., Gowan, C. Social learning enhances search image acquisition in foraging brook trout. Environ Biol Fish 97, 523–528 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0171-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0171-1