Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the Determinants of Denouncing Illegal Fishing: A Field Study in Artisanal Fishing Communities

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many artisanal fishing communities struggle with overfishing. One potential channel to mitigate overfishing is through self-monitoring and denouncing of illegal fishing practices. In this paper, we investigate the determinants of fishermen’s willingness to report the catching of illegally small fish at a lake in Brazil. By using laboratory experiments and surveys, we provide novel evidence that impatience and pro-sociality play key roles. Fishermen who are more impatient in a laboratory inter-temporal choice experiment show a higher propensity to report misbehavior from other fishermen. This finding suggests that impatience is a driver for the punishment of resource exploitation. Moreover, we find that fishermen who are more pro-social in a laboratory public goods experiment are also more likely to report overfishing, suggesting that both time and social preferences are related to the reporting of resource overexploitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Numerous animal and human studies show that high degrees of impulsivity are common (e.g. Fairbanks et al. 1999; Manuck et al. 2000; Seroczynski et al. 1999) rendering it possible that they are transmitted by genes and the product of frequency-dependent selection (Krebs and Davies 1993; Budaev 1999; Dingemanse and Reale 2005) or the result of an evolved mechanism responding to adverse environmental circumstances (Belsky et al. 1991).

  2. From this does not follow that impatience is generally positively related to resource conservation. In fact, Fehr and Leibbrandt (2011) show that more impatient fishermen are more likely to use more exploitative fishing gear.

  3. Fishermen can sell both, small and big fish, on markets. While big fish are sold for considerable higher prices per kg, small fish are also sold on markets.

  4. We have worked in this setting for years with fishermen and their village leaders. We never experienced problems when trusting village leaders with payments.

  5. Most of our fishers work full-time fishing. The reported fishing time of 25.05 h per week refers to the time spent fishing but does not include the time spent for preparation and sales activities.

References

  • Acheson JM (1988) The lobster gangs of main. University Press of New England, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessi SM, Petry NM (2003) Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behav Process 64(3):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias A, Cinner JE, Jones RE, Pressey RL (2015) Levels and drivers of fishers’ compliance with marine protected areas. Ecol Soc 20(4):19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland JM, Platteau JP (1996) Halting degradation of natural resources. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P (1991) Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Dev 62:647–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In: Linking social and ecological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–25

  • Boonmanunt S, Lauer T, Rockenbach B, Weiss A (2019) Field evidence on the contested role of time preferences in resource management. Working paper

  • Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S, Richerson PJ (2003) The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(6):3531–3535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budaev SV (1999) Sex differences in the big five personality factors: testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Personal Individ Differ 26:801–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti C, Schläpfer F, Schmid B (2010) Public participation and willingness to cooperate in CPR management: a field experiment with fishing communities in Brazil. Ecol Econ 69:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti C, Engel S, Leibbrandt A (2013) Social integration, participation, and community resource management. J Environ Econ Manage 65(2):262–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett M, Clark L, Lieberman M, Tabibnia G, Robbins T (2010) Impulsive choice and altruistic punishment are correlated and increase in tandem with serotonin depletion. Emotion 10(6):855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Quervain DJ, Fischbacher U, Treyer V, Schellhammer M (2004) The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305(5688):1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Reale D (2005) Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour 142:1159–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks LA, Fontenot MB, Phillips-Conroy JE, Jolly CJ, Kaplan JR, Mann JJ (1999) CSF monoamines, age and impulsivity in wild grivet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops aethiops). Brain Behav Evol 53:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Leibbrandt A (2011) A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons. J Public Econ 95:1144–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ Lett 71:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B, Meier S (2004) Social comparison and pro-social behavior: testing conditional cooperation in a field experiment. Am Econ Rev 94(5):1717–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Hum Behav 24:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck M, Kroese M (2006) Fisheries compliance in South Africa: a decade of challenges and reform 1994–2004. Mar Policy 30(1):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Lesorogol C (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann B, Thöni S, Gächter S (2008) Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319:1362–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javaid A, Kulesz MM, Schlüter A, Ghosh A, Jiddawi NS (2016) Time preferences and natural resource extraction behavior: an experimental study from artisanal fisheries in Zanzibar. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperan K, Sutinen JG (1998) Blue water crime: deterrence, legitimacy, and compliance in fisheries. Law Soc Rev 32:309–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127(2):267–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuck SB, Flory JD, Ferrell RE, Mann JJ, Muldoon MF (2000) A regulatory polymorphism of the monoamine oxidase-A gene may be associated with variability in aggression, impulsivity, and central nervous system serotonergic responsivity. Psychiatry Res 95(1):9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2002) The drama of the commons. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JR, Mathiesen C (2003) Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Denmark. Mar Policy 27(5):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Perspect 14(3):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2010) Analyzing collective action. Agric Econ 41(S1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. Am Polit Sci Rev 86:404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price ME, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2002) Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evol Hum Behav 23:203–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson P, Boyd R (1998) In: Eibl-Eibesfeldt I, Salter F (eds) Ideology, warfare and indoctrinability. Berghan Books, New York, pp 71–95

  • Seroczynski AD, Bergeman CS, Coccaro EF (1999) Etiology of the impulsivity/aggression relationship: genes or environment? Psychiatry Res 86:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EA, Bliege Bird R (2005) Costly signalling and cooperative behaviour. In: Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (eds) Moral sentiment and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 115–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E, Wilson D (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behaviour. Harvard Univesity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström A (2012) Corruption and regulatory compliance: experimental findings from South African small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 36(6):1255–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Guevara LE, Schlüter A (2016) External validity of artefactual field experiments: a study on cooperation, impatience and sustainability in an artisanal fishery in Colombia. Ecol Econ 128:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker B (2007) Applying behavioral ecology and behavioral economics to conservation and development planning: an example from the Mikea forest, Madagascar. Hum Nat 18(3):190–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner JT, Pleeter S (2001) The personal discount rate: evidence from military downsizing programs. Am Econ Rev Am Econ Assoc 91(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi T (1986) The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Stefanie Engel, Andreas Leibbrandt and Michel Marechal and seminar participants for their feedback. I also would like to thank the Ostrom Workshop for hosting me as a research fellow when conducting this research. Finally, I would like to thank the Environmental Education Institute at the Feira de Santana State University in Brazi, as well as the participants in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Cavalcanti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavalcanti, C. On the Determinants of Denouncing Illegal Fishing: A Field Study in Artisanal Fishing Communities. Environ Resource Econ 77, 217–228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00471-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00471-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation