1 Erratum to: Environ Resource Econ DOI 10.1007/s10640-016-0065-8

The authors would like to replace Fig. 13 in the original article with the below figure. Due to a misspecification in the corresponding shape file the original figure may have given the impression that the treatment and control groups were not cleanly separated. Figure 13 clearly demonstrates the spatial distribution and the correct separation of these groups.

Fig. 13
figure 1

Treatment and control groups with NN matching