Abstract
Environmental issues provide a rich ground for identifying the existence and consequences of human limitations. In this paper, we present a growing literature lying at the interface between behavioral and environmental economics. This literature identifies alternative solutions to traditional economic instruments in environmental domains that often work imperfectly. But it also faces a set of challenges, including the difficulty of computing welfare effects, and the identification of a robust environmental policy based on context-dependent (socio-) psychological effects. We illustrate our critical discussion with two behavioral schemes that have been widely implemented: “green nudges” and “corporate environmental responsibility.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbink K, Brandts J, Herrmann B, Orzen H (2010) Intergroup conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. Am Econ Rev 100:420–447
Ajzen I (1991) A theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Human Decis Process 50(179):211
Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 95:1082–1095
Allcott H, Mullainathan S (2010) Behavior and energy policy. Science 327:1204–5
Allcott H, Rogers T (2012) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev. Forthcoming
American Psychological Association (APA) (2009) A report of the APA task force on the interface between psychology and Global climate change. Chair: Janet Swim
Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manage Perspect 22:45–62
Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am Econ Rev 99:544–555
Ayers I, Raseman S, Shih A (2009) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. NBER working paper
Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty year after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25
Barla P (2007) ISO 14001 certification and environmenttal performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. J Environ Econ Manage 53:291–306
Baron D (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J Econ Manage Strategy 1:7–45
Baron J, Spranca M (1997) Protected values. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 70:1–16
Bateman et al (2002) Economic valuation with stated preferences techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Baumeister RF (2002) Yielding to temptation: self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. J Consumer Res 28:670–676
Bazerman MH (2011) Bounded ethicality in negotiations. Negot Confl Manage Res 4:8–11
Benabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behaviour. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1652–1678
Benabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77:1–19
Beshears J, Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian B (2008) How are preferences revealed? J Public Econ 92:1787–1794
Besley T, Ghatak M (2007) Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. J Public Econ 91:1645–1663
Bird L, Kreycik C, Friedman B (2009) Green power marketing in the US: a status report. NREL
Bolderdijk JW, Steg L, Geller ES, Lehman PK, Postmes T (2012) Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1767
Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2008) Moral hazard and moral motivations: corporate social responsibility as labor market screening. Resour Energy Econ 30:506–526
Brown Z, Johnstone N, Hascic I, Vong L, Barascud F (2013) Testing the effects of defaults on the thermostat settings of OECD employees. Energy Econ 39:128–134
Carlsson F (2010) Design of stated preference surveys: is there more to learn from behavioral economics? Environ Res Econ 46:167–177
Carlsson F, Kataria M, Lampi E (2011) Do EPA administrators recommend environmental policies that citizens want? Land Econ 87:60–74
Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2012) Behavioral economics and environmental policy. Ann Rev Resour Econ 4:75–99
Camerer C, Issacharoff S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”. Univ Pa Law Rev 151:1211–1254
Cason T, Gangadharan K (2002) Environmental labeling and incomplete consumer information in laboratory markets. J Environ Econ Manage 43:113–134
Centre d’Analyse Stratégique (CAS) (2011) Nudges Verts : De Nouvelles Incitations pour des Comportements Ecologiques. Note d’Analyse 216
Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW (2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J Econ Manage Strategy 18:125–169
Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian C (2004) Plan design and 401(k) savings outcomes. Natl Tax J 57:275–298
Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol 55:591–622
Costa DL, Kahn ME (2013) Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J Eur Econ Assoc 11:680–702
Crifo P, Forget V (2012) The economics of corporate social responsibility: a survey. Mimeo, New York
Dana J, Kuang J, Weber R (2007) Exploiting the moral wriggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econ Theor 33:67–80
Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum, New York
Della Vigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart J Econ 127:1–56
Delmas MA, Cuerel Burbano V (2011) The drivers of greenwashing. Calif Manag Rev 54:64–87
Devine-Wright P, Clayton S (2010) Introduction to the special issue: place, identity and environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:267–270
D’Haultfoeuille X, Givord P, Boutin X (2014) The environmental effect of green taxation: the case of the french bonus/malus. Econ J. Forthcoming
Duflo E, Kremer M, Robinson J (2011) Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. Am Econ Rev 101:2350–2390
Dunlap RE (2008) The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. J Environ Education 40(1):3–18
Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart J Econ 75:643–669
European Commission (EC) (2011) Communication from the commission: a renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility
Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24:56–62
Ferraro PJ, Miranda JJ, Price MK (2011) The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 101:318–322
Ferraro PJ, Price MK (2011) Using non-pecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev Econ Stat (in press)
Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 122–126
Gifford R (2007) Environmental psychology: principles and practice, 4th edn. Optimal Books, Colville, WA
Glachant M (2007) Non-binding voluntary agreements. J Environ Econ Manage 54(1):32–48
Glaeser E (2005) Paternalism and psychology. Working paper, NBER
Glazer A, Konrad K (1996) A signaling explanation for charity. Am Econ Rev 86:1019–1028
Goldstein N, Cialdini R, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consumer Res 35:472–482
Gowdy JM (2008) Behavioral economics and climate change policy. J Econ Behav Organ 68(3–4):632–644
Gruber J, Koszegi B (2004) Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: the case of cigarette excise taxes. J Public Econ 88:1959–1987
Gupta S, Innes R (2009) Private politics and environmental management. Mimeo, New York
Hammitt JK (2013) Positive vs. normative justifications for benefit-cost analysis: implications for interpretation and policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(2):199–218
Hawcroft LJ, Milfont TL (2010) The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 20 years: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 30:143–158
Heal G (2005) Corporate social responsibility: economic and financial perspectives. Geneva Papers 30:387–409
Hilton D, Charalambides L, Demarque C, Waroquer L, Raux C (2013) A tax can nudge: the impact of ecologically motivated bonus-malus system on transport preferences. Mimeo, New York
Horowitz J, McConnell K (2002) A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manage 44:426–447
Johansson-Stenman O (2008) Mad cows, terrorism and junk food: should public policy reflect subjective or objective risks? J Health Econ 27(2):234–248
Johansson-Stenman O, Konow J (2010) Fair air: distributional justice and environmental economics. Environ Res Econ 46:147–166
Johnson E, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302:1338–1339
Kahneman D, Sugden R (2005) Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environ Res Econ 32:161–181
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291
Kallbekken S, Saelen H (2013) Nudging hotel guests to reduce food wastes as a win–win environmental measure. Econ Lett 119:325–327
Karp L (2005) Global warming and hyperbolic discounting. J Public Econ 89:261–282
Khan U, Dhar R (2007) Licensing effect in consumer choice. J Mark Res 43:259–266
Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2011) Strategic environmental disclosure: evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. J Environ Econ Manage 61:311–326
King A, Lenox MJ (2000) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J Ind Ecol 5:105–116
Kitzmuller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J Econ Lit 50:3–50
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260
Kuran T, Sunstein C (1999) Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanf Law Rev 51:683–768
Lange A, Loschel A, Vogt C, Ziegler A (2010) On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations. Eur Econ Rev 54:359–375
Larrick RP, Soll JB (2008) The MPG illusion. Science 320(5883):1593–1594
Ledyard J (1995) Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In: Kagel J, Roth A (eds) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery and values. Clim Change 77:45–72
List J (2006) Using experimental methods in environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Loewenstein G, Ubel PA (2008) Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. J Public Econ 92:1795–1810
Lofgren A, Martinsson P, Hennlock M, Sterner T (2012) Does experience eliminate the effects of a default option? A field experiment on CO2-offsetting for air transport. J Environ Econ Manage 63:66–72
Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2004) Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Madrian B, Shea D (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart J Econ 116:1149–1187
Margolis JD, Elfenbein H, Walsh J (2009) Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge
Mazar N, Zhong CB (2010) Do green products make us better people? Psychol Sci 21:494–498
McCright RE, Dunlap AM (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50:348–373
Munro A (2009) Bounded rationality and public policy. Springer, New York
Nolan JM et al (2008) Normative social influences is underdetected. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34:913–923
Nyborg K (2010) Will green taxes undermine moral motivation? Public Finance Manage 110:331–351
Opotow S, Weiss L (2000) Denial and the process of moral exclusion in environmental conflict. J Soc Issues 56:475–490
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012) Behavioral economics and environmental policy design, project description, Empirical Policy Analysis Unit
Pichert D, Katsikopoulosa K (2008) Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 28:63–73
Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL (2009) Sinning saints and saintly sinners: the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychol Sci 20:523–528
Saint-Paul G (2011) The tyranny of utility: behavioral social sciences and the rise of paternalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Salanié F, Treich N (2009) Regulation in Happyville. Econ J 119:665–679
Shang J, Croson R (2009) Field experiments in charitable contribution: the impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econ J 119:1422–1439
Schultz W, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429–434
Sherif M (1967) Group conflict and cooperation: their social psychology. Routledge and Kegan, London
Shogren J, Taylor L (2008) On behavioral-environmental economics. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2:26–44
Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications
Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manage Sci 3:321–339
Sterman JD (2008) Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Sci Policy Forum 322:532–533
Stern P (2011) Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. Am Psychol 66:303–314
Sugden R (2009) On nudging: a review of nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Int J Econ Bus 16:365–373
Sunstein CR (1993) Endogenous preferences, environmental law. J Legal Stud 22:217–254
Sunstein CR, Reisch LA (2013) Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection. Havard Environ Law Rev. Forthcoming
Sunstein CR, Thaler RH (2003) Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev 93(2):175–179
Swim JK, Clayton S, Howard GS (2011) Human behavioral contributions to climate change: psychological and contextual drivers. Am Psychol 66:251–264
TerraChoice (2009) The seven sins of greenwashing. Mimeo, New York
Tetlock PE (2003) Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn Sci 7:320–324
Thaler RH (2013) Public policies, made to fit people. New York Times, August 24, 2013
Thaler RH, Shefrin HM (1981) An economic theory of self-control. J Polit Econ 89:392–406
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, penguin books
Tietenberg T (1998) Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environ Res Econ 11:587–602
Tolliver-Nigro H (2011) Green market to grow 267 percent by 2015. Mimeo, New York
Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory and psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117(440):63
Treich N (2010) The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion. J Environ Econ Manage 59:15–26
Uzzell DL (2000) The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. J Environ Psychol 20: 307–318
Videras J, Alberini A (2000) The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? Contemp Econ Policy 18:449–460
Viscusi WK, Hamilton JT (1999) Are risk regulators rational? Evidence from hazardous waste cleanup decisions. Am Econ Rev 89:210–227
Acknowledgments
We thank Stefan Ambec, Ian Bateman, Denis Hilton, Janet Swim and Laurent Waroquier as well as two anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions. This paper follows the David Pearce keynote lecture delivered by Rachel Croson at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) conference in June 2013 in Toulouse (see especially Sect. 2 on “green nudges”). It also uses some insights from the presentations and discussions at the “Behavioral Environmental Economics” workshop organized by Nicolas Treich at the Toulouse School of Economics in October 2012. Nicolas Treich acknowledges financial support from the ANR INCRESP project, the French Ministry of Environment and the Chair “Finance Durable et Investissement Responsable” (FDIR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Croson, R., Treich, N. Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges. Environ Resource Econ 58, 335–351 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9783-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9783-y