Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 335–351 | Cite as

Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges

Article

Abstract

Environmental issues provide a rich ground for identifying the existence and consequences of human limitations. In this paper, we present a growing literature lying at the interface between behavioral and environmental economics. This literature identifies alternative solutions to traditional economic instruments in environmental domains that often work imperfectly. But it also faces a set of challenges, including the difficulty of computing welfare effects, and the identification of a robust environmental policy based on context-dependent (socio-) psychological effects. We illustrate our critical discussion with two behavioral schemes that have been widely implemented: “green nudges” and “corporate environmental responsibility.”

Keywords

Behavioral economics Environmental policy Nudge   Corporate social responsibility Environmental psychology. 

References

  1. Abbink K, Brandts J, Herrmann B, Orzen H (2010) Intergroup conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. Am Econ Rev 100:420–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1991) A theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Human Decis Process 50(179):211Google Scholar
  3. Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 95:1082–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allcott H, Mullainathan S (2010) Behavior and energy policy. Science 327:1204–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allcott H, Rogers T (2012) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev. ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  6. American Psychological Association (APA) (2009) A report of the APA task force on the interface between psychology and Global climate change. Chair: Janet SwimGoogle Scholar
  7. Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manage Perspect 22:45–62Google Scholar
  8. Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am Econ Rev 99:544–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ayers I, Raseman S, Shih A (2009) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. NBER working paperGoogle Scholar
  10. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty year after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barla P (2007) ISO 14001 certification and environmenttal performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. J Environ Econ Manage 53:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baron D (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J Econ Manage Strategy 1:7–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baron J, Spranca M (1997) Protected values. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 70:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bateman et al (2002) Economic valuation with stated preferences techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Baumeister RF (2002) Yielding to temptation: self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. J Consumer Res 28:670–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bazerman MH (2011) Bounded ethicality in negotiations. Negot Confl Manage Res 4:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Benabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behaviour. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1652–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Benabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Beshears J, Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian B (2008) How are preferences revealed? J Public Econ 92:1787–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Besley T, Ghatak M (2007) Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. J Public Econ 91:1645–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bird L, Kreycik C, Friedman B (2009) Green power marketing in the US: a status report. NRELGoogle Scholar
  22. Bolderdijk JW, Steg L, Geller ES, Lehman PK, Postmes T (2012) Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1767
  23. Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2008) Moral hazard and moral motivations: corporate social responsibility as labor market screening. Resour Energy Econ 30:506–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brown Z, Johnstone N, Hascic I, Vong L, Barascud F (2013) Testing the effects of defaults on the thermostat settings of OECD employees. Energy Econ 39:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carlsson F (2010) Design of stated preference surveys: is there more to learn from behavioral economics? Environ Res Econ 46:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carlsson F, Kataria M, Lampi E (2011) Do EPA administrators recommend environmental policies that citizens want? Land Econ 87:60–74Google Scholar
  27. Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2012) Behavioral economics and environmental policy. Ann Rev Resour Econ 4:75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Camerer C, Issacharoff S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”. Univ Pa Law Rev 151:1211–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cason T, Gangadharan K (2002) Environmental labeling and incomplete consumer information in laboratory markets. J Environ Econ Manage 43:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Centre d’Analyse Stratégique (CAS) (2011) Nudges Verts : De Nouvelles Incitations pour des Comportements Ecologiques. Note d’Analyse 216Google Scholar
  31. Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW (2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J Econ Manage Strategy 18:125–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian C (2004) Plan design and 401(k) savings outcomes. Natl Tax J 57:275–298Google Scholar
  33. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol 55:591–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Costa DL, Kahn ME (2013) Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J Eur Econ Assoc 11:680–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Crifo P, Forget V (2012) The economics of corporate social responsibility: a survey. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Dana J, Kuang J, Weber R (2007) Exploiting the moral wriggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econ Theor 33:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Della Vigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart J Econ 127:1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Delmas MA, Cuerel Burbano V (2011) The drivers of greenwashing. Calif Manag Rev 54:64–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Devine-Wright P, Clayton S (2010) Introduction to the special issue: place, identity and environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. D’Haultfoeuille X, Givord P, Boutin X (2014) The environmental effect of green taxation: the case of the french bonus/malus. Econ J. ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  42. Duflo E, Kremer M, Robinson J (2011) Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. Am Econ Rev 101:2350–2390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dunlap RE (2008) The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. J Environ Education 40(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart J Econ 75:643–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. European Commission (EC) (2011) Communication from the commission: a renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibilityGoogle Scholar
  46. Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24:56–62Google Scholar
  47. Ferraro PJ, Miranda JJ, Price MK (2011) The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 101:318–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ferraro PJ, Price MK (2011) Using non-pecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev Econ Stat (in press)Google Scholar
  49. Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 122–126Google Scholar
  50. Gifford R (2007) Environmental psychology: principles and practice, 4th edn. Optimal Books, Colville, WAGoogle Scholar
  51. Glachant M (2007) Non-binding voluntary agreements. J Environ Econ Manage 54(1):32–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Glaeser E (2005) Paternalism and psychology. Working paper, NBERGoogle Scholar
  53. Glazer A, Konrad K (1996) A signaling explanation for charity. Am Econ Rev 86:1019–1028Google Scholar
  54. Goldstein N, Cialdini R, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consumer Res 35:472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gowdy JM (2008) Behavioral economics and climate change policy. J Econ Behav Organ 68(3–4):632–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gruber J, Koszegi B (2004) Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: the case of cigarette excise taxes. J Public Econ 88:1959–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gupta S, Innes R (2009) Private politics and environmental management. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Hammitt JK (2013) Positive vs. normative justifications for benefit-cost analysis: implications for interpretation and policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(2):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hawcroft LJ, Milfont TL (2010) The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 20 years: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 30:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Heal G (2005) Corporate social responsibility: economic and financial perspectives. Geneva Papers 30:387–409Google Scholar
  61. Hilton D, Charalambides L, Demarque C, Waroquer L, Raux C (2013) A tax can nudge: the impact of ecologically motivated bonus-malus system on transport preferences. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Horowitz J, McConnell K (2002) A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manage 44:426–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Johansson-Stenman O (2008) Mad cows, terrorism and junk food: should public policy reflect subjective or objective risks? J Health Econ 27(2):234–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Johansson-Stenman O, Konow J (2010) Fair air: distributional justice and environmental economics. Environ Res Econ 46:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Johnson E, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302:1338–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kahneman D, Sugden R (2005) Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environ Res Econ 32:161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kallbekken S, Saelen H (2013) Nudging hotel guests to reduce food wastes as a win–win environmental measure. Econ Lett 119:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Karp L (2005) Global warming and hyperbolic discounting. J Public Econ 89:261–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Khan U, Dhar R (2007) Licensing effect in consumer choice. J Mark Res 43:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2011) Strategic environmental disclosure: evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. J Environ Econ Manage 61:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. King A, Lenox MJ (2000) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J Ind Ecol 5:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kitzmuller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J Econ Lit 50:3–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kuran T, Sunstein C (1999) Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanf Law Rev 51:683–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lange A, Loschel A, Vogt C, Ziegler A (2010) On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations. Eur Econ Rev 54:359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Larrick RP, Soll JB (2008) The MPG illusion. Science 320(5883):1593–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ledyard J (1995) Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In: Kagel J, Roth A (eds) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  79. Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery and values. Clim Change 77:45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. List J (2006) Using experimental methods in environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Loewenstein G, Ubel PA (2008) Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. J Public Econ 92:1795–1810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lofgren A, Martinsson P, Hennlock M, Sterner T (2012) Does experience eliminate the effects of a default option? A field experiment on CO2-offsetting for air transport. J Environ Econ Manage 63:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2004) Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Madrian B, Shea D (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart J Econ 116:1149–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Margolis JD, Elfenbein H, Walsh J (2009) Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance. Working paper. Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  86. Mazar N, Zhong CB (2010) Do green products make us better people? Psychol Sci 21:494–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McCright RE, Dunlap AM (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50:348–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Munro A (2009) Bounded rationality and public policy. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nolan JM et al (2008) Normative social influences is underdetected. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nyborg K (2010) Will green taxes undermine moral motivation? Public Finance Manage 110:331–351Google Scholar
  91. Opotow S, Weiss L (2000) Denial and the process of moral exclusion in environmental conflict. J Soc Issues 56:475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012) Behavioral economics and environmental policy design, project description, Empirical Policy Analysis UnitGoogle Scholar
  93. Pichert D, Katsikopoulosa K (2008) Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 28:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL (2009) Sinning saints and saintly sinners: the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychol Sci 20:523–528Google Scholar
  95. Saint-Paul G (2011) The tyranny of utility: behavioral social sciences and the rise of paternalism. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  96. Salanié F, Treich N (2009) Regulation in Happyville. Econ J 119:665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shang J, Croson R (2009) Field experiments in charitable contribution: the impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econ J 119:1422–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schultz W, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sherif M (1967) Group conflict and cooperation: their social psychology. Routledge and Kegan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  100. Shogren J, Taylor L (2008) On behavioral-environmental economics. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2:26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. London: Earthscan PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  102. Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manage Sci 3:321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sterman JD (2008) Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Sci Policy Forum 322:532–533Google Scholar
  104. Stern P (2011) Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. Am Psychol 66:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sugden R (2009) On nudging: a review of nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Int J Econ Bus 16:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sunstein CR (1993) Endogenous preferences, environmental law. J Legal Stud 22:217–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sunstein CR, Reisch LA (2013) Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection. Havard Environ Law Rev. ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  108. Sunstein CR, Thaler RH (2003) Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev 93(2):175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Swim JK, Clayton S, Howard GS (2011) Human behavioral contributions to climate change: psychological and contextual drivers. Am Psychol 66:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. TerraChoice (2009) The seven sins of greenwashing. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  111. Tetlock PE (2003) Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn Sci 7:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Thaler RH (2013) Public policies, made to fit people. New York Times, August 24, 2013Google Scholar
  113. Thaler RH, Shefrin HM (1981) An economic theory of self-control. J Polit Econ 89:392–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, penguin booksGoogle Scholar
  115. Tietenberg T (1998) Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environ Res Econ 11:587–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tolliver-Nigro H (2011) Green market to grow 267 percent by 2015. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  117. Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory and psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117(440):63Google Scholar
  118. Treich N (2010) The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion. J Environ Econ Manage 59:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Uzzell DL (2000) The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. J Environ Psychol 20: 307–318Google Scholar
  120. Videras J, Alberini A (2000) The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? Contemp Econ Policy 18:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Viscusi WK, Hamilton JT (1999) Are risk regulators rational? Evidence from hazardous waste cleanup decisions. Am Econ Rev 89:210–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Toulouse School of Economics (LERNA, INRA)ToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations