Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Equivalency Principle for Discounting the Value of Natural Assets: An Application to an Investment Project in the Basque Coast

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Making decisions about optimal investments in green infrastructure necessitates setting social discount rates. This paper suggests a practical way for determining the discount rate for projects or programmes in which one of the options is to maintain or restore land to an undeveloped state. We propose an “equivalency principle” to derive a simple rule that sets the discount rate. The rule is based on the premise that the long term value of a piece of undeveloped land ought to be at least the same as the value of an identical piece of land in the vicinity to which permission has been granted for development. We illustrate this principle with various case studies and we apply it to a contentious investment project in the Basque Country associated with the regeneration of a large scale harbour that involves reclaiming undeveloped land that has important ecological values, including for the conservation of a marine ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Yrjö Jahnssonin säätiö, Helsinkiuml;

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Cline WR, Maler KG, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz J (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency. In: Bruce JP, Lee H, Haites EF (eds) Climate change 1995: economic and social dimensions of climate change, contribution of working group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker K (2006) Barker review of land use planning. Interim report—analysis. Barker review of land use planning. http://www.barkerreviewofplanning.org.uk

  • Basque Government (2004) “Estadística de precios del suelo: Encuesta a promotores sobre suelo edificable 2003. Dpto. de Vivienda y Asuntos Sociales

  • Beltratti A, Chichilnisky G, Heal G (1998) Sustainable use of natural resources. In: Chichilnisky G, Heal G, Vercelli A (eds) Sustainability: dynamics and uncertainty, chapter 2.1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley D (2007) Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability: moving beyond “market failure”. Ecol Econom 63: 676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky G (1996) An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Soc Choice Welfare 13: 231–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbing P, Slee B (1994) The application of CVM to a land use controversy in the Scottish Highlands. Landsc Res 19(1): 14–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole D (2008) The Stern review and its critics: implications for the theory and practice of benefit-cost analysis. Nat Res J 48: 53–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper W, Laibson D (1999) The implications of hyperbolic discounting for project evaluation. In: Portney P, Weyant J (eds) Discouting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. J Risk Uncertain 37: 141–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Maler K-G (2000) Net national product, wealth and social well-being. Environ Dev Econom 5: 69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Maler K-G, Barrett S (1999) Intergenerational equity, social discount rates, and global warming. In: Portney PR, Weyant JP (eds) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz S (2008) A long-run target for climate policy: the Stern review and its critics, supporting research for the UK committee on climate change’s inaugural report building a low-carbon economy—the UK’s contribution to tackling climate change. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/dietzs/A%20long-run%20target%20for%20climate%20policy%20-%20the%20Stern%20Review%20and%20its%20critics.pdf

  • Fisher A, Krutilla J (1985) The economics of natural environments. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher A, Krutilla J (1975) Resource conservation, environmental preservation, and the rate of discount. Q J Econom 89(3): 358–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick S, Lowenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econom Lit 40(2): 351–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galarraga I, Martín I, Beristain I, Boto A (2004) El método de transferencia de valor (benefit transfer), una segunda opción para la evaluación de impactos económicos: el caso del Prestige. Ekonomiaz 57: 30–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Weitzman ML (2010) How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain?. Econom Lett 107: 350–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (2008) Discounting with fat-tailed economic growth. J Uncertain 37: 171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy J, Howardth R, Tisdell C (2010) Discounting, ethics and options for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem integrity. In: Kumar P (eds) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edgar Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaff de V, de V (1987) Social cost. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, vol 4. Macmillan, London pp 393–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo J (2004) Discounting and the social cost of carbon. Thesis for the Master’s Degree in Environmental Change and Management, University of Oxford

  • Hanley N, Spash CL (1993) The protection of ancient woodlands. In: Hanley N, Spash CL (eds) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman JC, Schafrick IC (2004) The relevant internal rate of return. Eng Econom 49(2): 139–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal GM (1998) Valuing the future: economic theory and sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos D, Mariel P, Fernández-Macho J (2009) The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. Ecol Econom 68: 2372–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos D, Riera P, Fernandez-Macho J, Gallastegui C, García D (2007) Informe final: Valoración económica del entorno natural del monte Jaizkibel. Instituto de Economía Publica (UPV/EHU9), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs (2004) An economic assessment of the costs and benefits of Natura 2000 sites in Scotland. Final Report. Scottish Executive 2004. Environment Group research report 2004/05

  • Krutilla JV (1967) Conservation reconsidered. Am Econom Rev 57: 777–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CZ, Lofgren KG (2000) Renewable resources and economic sustainability: a dynamic analysis with heterogeneous time preferences. J Environ Econom Manag 40: 236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, RC (eds) (1982) Discounting for time and risk in energy planning. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier J (1995) The environment as a luxury good or “too poor to be green”. Ecol Econom 13: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills ES, Hamilton BW (1994) Urban economics, 5th edn. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2007) The Stern review on the economics of climate change. J Econom Lit 45(3): 686–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. MIT press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasaia Port Authority (2010) Informe de sostenibilidad ambiental del plan director de infraestructuras del puerto de Pasaia. http://www.puertopasajes.net/en/index.php?lang=en

  • Samuelson PA (1980) Economics, 11th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 747

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1961) On optimizing the rate of saving. Econom J 71: 479–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1967) Isolation, assurance, and the social rate of discount. Q J Econom 81: 172–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econom Stud 41(Symposium Issue):29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/sternreview_index.htm

  • Summers L, Zeckhauser R (2008) Policymaking for posterity. J Risk Uncertain 37: 115–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjalling JY (1995) Historical development of the Newton–Raphson method. SIAM Rev 37(4): 531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ, Yohe G (2009) The stern review: a deconstruction. Energy Policy 37(3): 1032–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol R, Yohe G (2006) A review of the Stern review. World Econom 7(4): 233–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Valuation Office Agency (2011) Property market report 2011. The annual guide to the property market across England, Wales and Scotland. Crow copyright 2011. www.voa.gov.uk/dvs

  • Weikard H-P, Xhu X (2005) Discounting and environmental quality: when should dual rates be used?. Econom Model 22: 868–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (2001) Gamma discounting. Am Econom Rev 91(1): 260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (2007) The Stern review of the economics of climate change. J Econom Lit 45(3): 703–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (1998) Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J Environ Econom Manag 36(3): 201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (2009) On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econom Stat XCI: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser RJ, Viscusi WK (2008) Discounting dilemmas: editors’ introduction. J Risk Uncertain 37: 95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Alameda Urquijo 4, 4◦–1a, 48008, Bilbao, Spain

    Aline Chiabai, Ibon Galarraga, Anil Markandya & Unai Pascual

  2. IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain

    Anil Markandya & Unai Pascual

  3. Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver St., CB39EP, Cambridge, UK

    Unai Pascual

Authors
  1. Aline Chiabai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ibon Galarraga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anil Markandya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Unai Pascual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aline Chiabai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiabai, A., Galarraga, I., Markandya, A. et al. The Equivalency Principle for Discounting the Value of Natural Assets: An Application to an Investment Project in the Basque Coast. Environ Resource Econ 56, 535–550 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9589-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9589-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation