Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Economic Growth and Development: Towards a Catchup Model

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a model for economic growth applicable to a group of countries, constituting around half of the gross global production, that have been consistently “catching up” to the US since 1960 or so. This group can be termed “the convergence club.” The model has a theoretical basis developed in other publications (cited), but the present work is essentially empirical. It demonstrates that there is a very strong correlation between “catchup” growth, with respect to the US, and an energy proxy (EP). The energy proxy that works best is a linear combination of domestic electric power consumption petroleum (oil) consumption, per capita, compared to the US levels. The results presented here do not constitute a theory of growth, but they are consistent with theory presented elsewhere. On a practical level, we argue that consistent “catchup” trends over the past 40 years can safely be extrapolated for a few more decades for scenario construction purposes. We also believe that the observed catchup trends can be regarded as “potential” mid-term or long-term growth trajectories for transition economies and others that have recently been adversely affected by conflict or mismanagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz M (1952) Economics of growth. In: Haley (ed) A survey of contemporary economics. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., New York, pp 132–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitz M (1956). Resources and output trends in the United States since 1870. Am Econ Rev 46: 5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P and Howitt P (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2): 323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P and Howitt P (1998). Endogenous growth theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU (2002). Exergy flows in the economy: efficiency and dematerialization. In: Ayres, RU and Ayres, LW (eds) A handbook of industrial ecology, pp 185–201. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, Ayres LW and Warr B (2003). Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998. Energy 28(3): 219–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU and Kneese AV (1969). Production, consumption and externalities. Am Econ Rev 59: 282–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU and Warr B (2005). Accounting for growth: the role of physical work. Struct Change Econ Dyn 16(2): 181–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU and Warr B (2002). Economic growth models and the role of physical resources. In: Bartelmus, P (eds) Unveiling wealth: on money, quality of life and sustainability, pp 171–188. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU and Warr B (2003). Useful work and information as drivers of growth. INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1991). Economic growth in a cross–section of countries. Quart J Econ 106(2): 407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ and Sala-I-Martin X (1992). Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2): 223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ and Sala-I-Martin X (1995). Economic growth. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1986). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: what the long run data show. Am Econ Rev 76(5): 1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Blackman S, Batey A and Wolff EN (1989). Productivity and American leadership: the long view. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David D (1994). Convergence clubs and diverging economies. CEPR, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1979). Accounting for slower growth. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before US. Committee for Economic Development, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1967). Why growth rates differ. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1974). Accounting for US economic growth, 1929–1969. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1985). Trends in American economic growth, 1929–1982. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Domar ED (1946). Capital expansion, rate of growth and employment. Econometrica 14: 137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W and Levine R (2001). It’s not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models. World Bank Econ Rev 15(2): 177–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricant S (1954) Economic progress and economic change. In: 34th annual report. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

  • Fel’dman GA (1928) On the theory of the rates of growth of national income. Planovoe Khozyaistvo (11/12)

  • Fel’dman GA (1964) On the theory of the rates of growth of national income. In: Spulber N (ed) Foundations of soviet strategy for economic growth, Indiana University Press, Bloomington IL, pp 174–199, 304–331

  • Gollop FM, Jorgenson DW (1980) US productivity growth by industry, 1948–1973. In: Kendrick JW, Vaccara BN (eds) New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis. National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod RF (1939). An essay in dynamic theory. Econ J 49: 14–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2006) Penn world table Version 6.1.

  • Hogan WW and Jorgenson DW (1991). Productivity trends and the costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Energy J 12: 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor N (1961) Capital accumulation and economic growth. In: Lukz, Hague (eds) The theory of capital. St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp 177–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick JW (1956). Productivity trends: Capital and labor. Rev Econ Stat 38: 248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick JW (1961). Productivity trends in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick JW (1973). Postwar productivity trends in the United States, 1948–1969. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick JW and Grossman ES (1980). Productivity in the United States: trends and cycles. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD

    Google Scholar 

  • King RG and Rebelo S (1990). Public policy and economic growth: developing neoclassical implications. J Polit Econ 98: 126–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1963). Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations. Econ Dev Cultural Change 11(2/II): 1–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WA (1955). Theory of economic development. (Paperback) Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22(1): 2–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison A (1995). Explaining the economic performance of nations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG (1995). The growth of nations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1995(1): 275–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D and Weil D (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quart J Econ 107(May): 407–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade JE (1961). A neoclassical theory of economic growth. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder P (2004) A new framework for economic projections. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, p 37

  • Mulder P, Hofkes MW and Groot HLF (2001). Economic growth and technological change: a comparison of insights from a neoclassical and an evolutionary perspective. Technol Forecast Social Change 68: 151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR and Winter SG (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. Am Econ Rev 72(1): 114–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Energy Agency (2005a) Energy balances of non–OECD countries 1971–2003. OECD, Paris

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Energy Agency (2005b) Energy balances of OECD countries 1960–2003. OECD, Paris

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Energy Agency (2005c) Energy statistics of non–OECD countries 1971–2003. OECD, Paris

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Energy Agency (2005d) Energy statistics of OECD countries 1960–2003. OECD, Paris

  • Quah D (1996). Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40: 1353–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo S (1991). Long–run policy analysis and long–run growth. J Polit Econ 99(3): 500–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (2002) Economic growth. In: Henderson D (ed) Concise encyclopedia of economics. Liberty Fund Inc., http://econlib.org. (accessed 29 June 2006)

  • Romer PM (1986). Increasing returns and long–run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5): 1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. Am Econ Rev 77(2): 56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostow WW (1960). The stages of economic growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-I-Martin X (1997). I just ran two million regressions. Am Econ Rev 87(2): 178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-I-Martin X (1996). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40: 1325–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart J Econ 70: 65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39: 312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan T (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Record 32(68): 334–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (2003) Productivity enhancement for social advance. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna, pp 17–23

  • Warr B and Ayres RU (2006). The Meet–Rexs model. Struct Change Econ Dyn 17: 329–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006) World development indicators, 2005. World Development Indicators (WDI), World Bank

  • Young A (1995). The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian experience. Quart J Econ 110(3): 641–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA

    Jie Li

  2. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg, 2236, Austria

    Robert U. Ayres

Authors
  1. Jie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert U. Ayres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert U. Ayres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Ayres, R.U. Economic Growth and Development: Towards a Catchup Model. Environ Resource Econ 40, 1–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9138-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9138-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation