Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the Relationship Between Socially-Shared Emotion Regulation and Building Team Coordination Mechanisms During a Hackathon

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For effective teamwork, especially in demanding learning situations like a hackathon, coordination is crucial as it contributes to mutual trust and shared mental models of team members. However, teams experience challenges that mar team coordination. Research has shown that interpersonal skills such as socially-shared emotion regulation (SSER) can be key in dealing with such challenges. We examined the relationship between SSER and mutual trust, and SSER and shared mental models in the context of a hackathon. Adapted from a small SSER scale, we built a 27-item questionnaire to examine SSER and its relationship with mutual trust and shared mental modelsin programming teams. We also used heat maps to provide an overview of individual team members’ perceptions of their teams’ SSER strategy application, mutual trust, and strength of shared mental model bonds within the team. Regarding the relationship between SSER and shared mental models, our analyses revealed signification association (correlation) between: (a) SSER situation modification and shared mental model: task and communication skills and (b) SSER situation modification and shared mental model: team dynamics and interaction. For the relationship between SSER and mutual trust, our analyses revealed significant relationships between: (a) SSER situation modification and perceived trustworthiness, (b) SSER cognitive change and perceived trustworthiness, (c) SSER response modulation and cooperative behaviors, and (d) SSER response modulation and monitoring behaviors. These relationships highlight the power of SSER in building key team coordination mechanisms and strengthening team performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90045-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anat, R., Shy, R., & Cheshin, A. (2009). Sensemaking in virtual teams: The impact of emotions and support tools on team mental models and team performance. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24, 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470745267.ch5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S., & Gibson, E. (1998). Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. In D. H. Gruenfeld (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 81–102). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behfar, K., Peterson, R., Mannix, E., & Trochim, W. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170

  • Bentzen, T. Ø. (2022). The tripod of trust: a multilevel approach to trust-based leadership in public organizations. Public Management Review, 1–23.

  • Brett, J., Behfar, K., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2014). Managing cross-cultural conflicts: A close look at the implication of direct versus indirect confrontation. In A. Ashkanasy, O. Ayoko, & K. A. Jehn (Eds.), Handbook of research in conflict management (pp. 136–154). Edward Edgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, M., & Edmondson, A. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221–246). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Tjosvold, D., & Su Fang, S. (2005). Working with foreign managers: Conflict management for effective leader relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(3), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W. L., Gavin, M. B., & Broberg, J. C. (2012). Big five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: Relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 752–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112464266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. (2011). Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903272083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. C., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. (2001). Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, C., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2015). Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daim, T., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., & Bhatla, A. (2012). Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davaei, M., Gunkel, M., Veglio, V., & Taras, V. (2022). The influence of cultural intelligence and emotional intelligence on conflict occurrence and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 28, 100969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C., & Weingart, L. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, F., Greer, L., & Jehn, K. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFranco, J., Neill, C., & Clariana, R. (2011). A cognitive collaborative model to improve performance in engineering teams: A study of team outcomes and mental model sharing. Systems Engineering, 14(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinh, J., Schweissing, E., Venkatesh, A., Traylor, A., Kilcullen, M., Perez, J., & Salas, E. (2021). The Study of Teamwork Processes Within the Dynamic Domains of Healthcare: A Systematic and Taxonomic Review. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.617928

  • Driskell, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (2018). Teams in extreme environments: Alterations in team development and teamwork. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druskat, V. U., & Wolff, S. B. (2001). Building the emotional intelligence of groups. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, T., & John, O. P. (2013). Understanding the social effects of emotion regulation: The mediating role of authenticity for individual differences in suppression. Emotion, 13(2), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, L. A., Costley, C., & Brown, C. (2010). Spirals of distrust vs spirals of trust in retail customer service: consumers as victims or allies. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011072573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabelica, C., Van den Bossche, P., Fiore, S. M., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2016). Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective. Human Performance, 29(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1120304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R., & Leslie, L. M. (2014). Conflict cultures: a new frontier for conflict management research and practice. In O. Ayoko, N. Ashkanasy, & K. Jehn (Eds.), Handbook of conflict management research (pp. 109–135). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R. (2007). Video representations and the perspectivity framework: epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 3–38). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2008). Emotion regulation. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 497–512). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Muñoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1995.tb00036.x

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

  • Hamilton, K., Shih, S., Tesler, R., & Mohammed, S. (2014). Team mental models and intragroup conflict. In O. Ayoko, N. Ashkansy, & K. Jehn (Eds.), Handbook of conflict management research (pp. 239–253). Edward Elgar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33(4), 439–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.2.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckman, R. S., Staats, B. R., & Upton, D. M. (2009). Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Science, 55(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2013). Team-based complex problem solving: A collective cognition perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9296-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isohätälä, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvelä, S., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2000). Socio-emotional orientation as a mediating variable in the teaching-learning interaction: Implications for instructional design. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.742334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. E., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O'Connor, D. L., Khalil, M. K., & Huang, X. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860701723802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. H., Dong, L., & Li, M. (2022). Conflict in Virtual Teams & Necessity of Cultural Intelligence for Effective Performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (2022(1), 11500). : Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemitabar, M., Lajoie, S. P., & Doleck, T. (2022). A process model of team emotion regulation: An expansion of Gross' individual ER model. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 33, 100612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemitabar, M. A. (2019). Examining the Effects of Socially-Shared Emotion Regulation on Team Coordination in a Physics Programming Competition (dissertation). https://www.proquest.com/docview/2515016557

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemitabar, M. A., Lajoie, S. P., & Li, T. (2022). A classification of Challenges encountered in Complex Teamwork Settings. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1–23.

  • Kim, D. H. (1998). The link between individual and organizational learning. In D. Klein (Ed.), The strategic management of intellectual capital (pp. 41–62). Butterworth- Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence-vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Kirschner, F., & Janssen, J. (2014). The collaboration principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 547–575). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Komssi, M., Pichlis, D., Raatikainen, M., Kindstrom, K., & Jarvinen, J. (2015). What are Hackathons for? IEEE Software, 32(5), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2014.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507610362036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019). Authenticity. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2012). Measuring trust beliefs and behaviours. In F. Lyon, G. Mollering, & M. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust (pp. 29-39). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mach, M., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2010). The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 771–794. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X473903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Miranda, J., & Pavón, J. (2011). Modeling the influence of trust on work team performance. Simulation, 88(4), 408–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549711404714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, N. (2008). Towards understanding the role of emotions in conflict: A review and future directions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(4), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060810909301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Duc, A., Cruzes, D. S., & Conradi, R. (2015). The impact of global dispersion on coordination, team performance and software quality–A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 57, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Team virtues and performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E., Kirschner, P. A., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: A shared regulation intervention. Small Group Research, 46(4), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415591219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. American Psychologist, 73(4), 593. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sänger, J., Bechtold, L., Schoofs, D., Blaszkewicz, M., & Wascher, E. (2014). The influence of acute stress on attention mechanisms and its electrophysiological correlates. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 353–368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrock, D., & Knop, B. (2014). Gender and emotions. In J. Stets & J. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions: Volume II (pp. 411–428). Springer Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shuffler, M., & Carter, D. (2018). Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities. American Psychologist, 73(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strode, D., Dingsøyr, T., & Lindsjorn, Y. (2022). A teamwork effectiveness model for agile software development. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10115-0

  • Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ujitani, E., & Volet, S. (2008). Socio-emotional challenges in international education Insight into reciprocal understanding and intercultural relational development. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908099975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., Jungmann, F., Liebermann, S., Shemla, M., Ries, B. C., Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K. H. (2012). What makes age diverse teams effective? Results from a six-year research program. Work, 41(1), 5145–5151. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0084-5145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., Hadwin, A., & Perry, N. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chann, & A. O’Donnell. (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462-479). : Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, L. (2022). Flow in work teams: The role of emotional regulation, voice, and Team Mindfulness. Current Psychology, 41(11), 7867–7877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01179-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded in part by grants awarded to Dr. Susanne Lajoie from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC Partnership Grant) and doctoral fellowships awarded to Maedeh Kazemitabar from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Société et Culture (FRQSC) and McGill University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

    Maedeh Kazemitabar

  2. McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Susanne P. Lajoie

  3. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

    Tenzin Doleck

Authors
  1. Maedeh Kazemitabar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne P. Lajoie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tenzin Doleck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tenzin Doleck.

Ethics declarations

This article is based on a doctoral dissertation (Kazemitabar, 2019) conducted by the first author at McGill University. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 9 Socially-Shared Emotion Regulation (Developed based on the AIRE instrument; Järvenoja et al., 2013)
Full size table
Table 10 Shared Mental Models (Adapted from Johnson et al., 2007)
Full size table
Table 11 Trust Questionnaire (Adapted from Costa & Andersen, 2011)
Full size table

Appendix B

Fig. 7
figure 7

Heat map representation of SSER among team members for all teams.

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Heat map representation of mutual trust within teams for all teams. Reverse items are italicized and marked with an asterisk, however heat maps represent trust directly (not reversely).

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Heat map representation of shared mental models in teams for all teams.

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemitabar, M., Lajoie, S.P. & Doleck, T. Examining the Relationship Between Socially-Shared Emotion Regulation and Building Team Coordination Mechanisms During a Hackathon. Educ Inf Technol 29, 6241–6272 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12021-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12021-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation