Abstract
Technological progress has a significant impact on higher education and increases the popularity of artificial intelligence technologies in universities of different countries. This research was based at Tianshui Normal University in China. The authors examined the impact of an interactive learning environment based on artificial intelligence in the context of the preservation of important cognitive functions such as IQ as well as long-term and short-term memory. This research enrolled 539 s-year students. The experimental group (N = 322) consisted of students of the Faculty of Music, who have been studying music for more than one year using artificial intelligence technologies such as mobile applications, video games, music simulators, etc. The control group (N = 217) consisted of students of the Faculty of Arts, who never used the potential of the interactive educational environment during their studies. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) was chosen as the main method. The test results showed that students in the control and experimental groups averaged the same normal intelligence (97.61). At the same time, there was no significant intergroup difference on all four scales: verbal comprehension, perceptual thinking, working memory, and information processing speed (P ≥ 0.05). It has been found that students in both groups equally rarely reported problems in terms of long-term or short-term memory (P ≥ 0.05). The findings can be used to intensify the scientific discussion about the threats and developmental potential of artificial intelligence in higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available on request.
References
Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Iranmanesh, M., Al-Qaysi, N., Iahad, N. A., & Arpaci, I. (2022). Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2075014.
Benites, D., & Gomes, W. B. (2007). Tradução, adaptação e validação preliminar do prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ). Psico-Usf, 12, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-82712007000100006.
Chiu, M. C., Hwang, G. J., Hsia, L. H., & Shyu, F. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-supported art education: A deep learning-based system for promoting university students’ artwork appreciation and painting outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2100426.
Drozdick, L. W., Raiford, S. E., Wahlstrom, D., & Weiss, L. G. (2018). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition and the Wechsler Memory Scale—Fourth Edition. In D. P. Flanagan, & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 486–511). The Guilford Press.
Ebadi, S., & Amini, A. (2022). Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners’ motivation using artificial intelligence technology: A case of CSIEC chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096638.
Fan, H. Z., Zhu, J. J., Wang, J., Cui, J. F., Chen, N., Yao, J., Tan, S., Duan, J. H., Pang, H. T., & Zou, Y. Z. (2019). Four-subtest index-based short form of WAIS-IV: Psychometric properties and clinical utility. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy016.
Huang, X. (2021). Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 5127–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10530-2.
Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education - A promise, a threat or a hype? In European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and RoboticsAt (pp. 1–9). Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.34190/ECIAIR.19.005.
Ijaz, K., Bogdanovych, A., & Trescak, T. (2017). Virtual worlds vs books and videos in history education. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 904–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1225099.
Krnjić, N., Latinović, B., & Ćosić, M. (2021). Students ‘perceptions of e-learning through online teaching in secondary school. International Journal of Sales Retailing and Marketing, 10(1), 37–42.
Li, C., Xing, W., & Leite, W. (2022). Using fair AI to predict students’ math learning outcomes in an online platform. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2115076.
Mambetalina, A. S. (2012). Formation of main components of students’ cognitive activity in high school. World Applied Sciences Journal, 20(S1), 67–72.
Mehtab, F. H., & Mahmud, A. (2022). Robots in the neighborhood: Application and criminalization of the artificial intelligence in education. In Technologies, Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Learning Post-COVID-19: The Crucial Role of International Accreditation (pp. 393–410). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93921-2_22.
Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Duncan Matthews, R. (2022). A sustainable university: Digital transformation and beyond. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8961–8996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10968-y.
Moturu, V. R., & Nethi, S. D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education. In emerging IT/ICT and AI Technologies affecting Society. Springer Nature, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2940-3_16.
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.
Roivainen, E. (2019). European and american WAIS IV norms: Cross-national differences in perceptual reasoning, processing speed and working memory subtest scores. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(6), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12581.
Rzanova, S., Vobolevich, A., Dmitrichenkova, S., Dolzhich, E., & Mamedova, L. (2022). Distance learning challenges and prospects during Covid-19 in the context of adolescent education. Social Work in Mental Health, 20(6), 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2022.2055439.
Sakenov, D. Z., Zhaparova, B. M., Kenzhebayeva, T. B., & Mambetalina, A. S. (2022). Model of socialization in an orphanage. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(2), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.2.483.
Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001.
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: AIEd for personalised learning pathways. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.5.2597.
Wang, S., Wang, H., Jiang, Y., Li, P., & Yang, W. (2021). Understanding students’ participation of intelligent teaching: an empirical study considering artificial intelligence usefulness, interactive reward, satisfaction, university support and enjoyment. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012813.
Wang, Y. M., Wei, C. L., Lin, H. H., Wang, S. C., & Wang, Y. S. (2022). What drives students’ AI learning behavior: A perspective of AI anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2153147.
Wang, S., Sun, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students’ self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4919–4939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11338-4.
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2022). The moderating effects of gender and need satisfaction on self-regulated learning through Artificial Intelligence (AI). Education and Information Technologies, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11547-x.
Yang, T. X., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Su, X. M., Ni, K., Lui, S. S., & Chan, R. C. (2022). Validity and normative data of the chinese prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ) across adolescence, adults and elderly people. Memory (Hove, England), 30(3), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.2014526.
Yao, K., & Yang, H. (2020). Research on the integration of artificial intelligence and education. Education Reform and Development, 2, 56–59. https://doi.org/10.26689/erd.v2i2.2062.
Yufeia, L., Salehb, S., Jiahuic, H., & Syed, S. M. (2020). Review of the application of artificial intelligence in education. Integration (Amsterdam), 12(8), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.53333/IJICC2013/12850.
Zhan, Z., Tong, Y., Lan, X., & Zhong, B. (2022). A systematic literature review of game-based learning in Artificial Intelligence education. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2115077.
Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2021). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693.
Zhou, C. (2023). Integration of modern technologies in higher education on the example of artificial intelligence use. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 3893–3910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11309-9.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.X. and T.W. contributed equally to the experimentation. X.X. wrote and edited the article, designed the experiment. T.W. conducted the experiment, studied scientific literature about the topic. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
The authors declare that the work is written with due consideration of ethical standards. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles approved by the Human Experiments Ethics Committee of Tianshui Normal University (Protocol no. 003 of 05.07.2022).
Informed consent
All the participants have given their written informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, X., Wang, T. Artificial Intelligence: A help or threat to contemporary education. Should students be forced to think and do their tasks independently?. Educ Inf Technol 29, 3097–3111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11947-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11947-7