Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

3D printing as an educational technology: theoretical perspectives, learning outcomes, and recommendations for practice

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D printing is an emerging educational technology that is said to prepare learners for a more technologically designed world. In this review, 3D printing studies are analyzed to identify the dominant theoretical approaches and learning outcomes associated with 3D printing in education. Five theories are identified, including situated learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991), experiential learning (Kolb & Kolb Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193- 212, Kolb & Kolb, 2005), and critical making (Ratto in The Information Society, 27, 252-260, 2011), but concepts from constructionism (Papert & Harel Constructionism, 36, 1-11, 1991) and self-directed learning (Garrison Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33, 1997; Knowles, 1975) are common amongst all approaches. Learning outcomes attributed to 3D printing include critical thinking, creativity, design thinking, and collaboration (Trust et al., 2018; Trust & Maloy Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 34, 253-266, 2017), with proponents arguing that the domain general outcomes go beyond knowing simply how to use a 3D printer. Given the identified, theoretical approaches, outcomes, and common barriers to use, recommendations are made for how educators approach and implement 3D printing in the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouhashem, Y., Savanah, S., Dayal, M., & Strkalj, G. (2015). The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Medical Education Online, 20(1) https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29847

  • Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J., Pratt, D., & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assante, D., Cennamo, G. M., & Placidi, L. (2020). 3D printing in education: An European perspective. Proceedings from 2020 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON).

  • Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, E., Comrie, N., Hofmann, M., McDonald, S., & Hurst, A. (2016). Investigating the implications of 3D printing in special education. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/287064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-H. & Chang, P.-L. (2018). 3D printing assisted in art education: Study on the effectiveness of visually impaired students in space learning. In Meen, prior, & lam (Eds.), IEEE international conference on applied system innovation 2018.

  • Chien, Y.-H., & Chu, P.-Y. (2017). The different learning outcomes of high school and college students on a 3D-printing STEAM engineering design curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., Huprich, J., Jones, W. M., & Smith, S. (2017). Educators’ perceptions of a maker-based learning experience. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34, 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2017-0050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. L., Bush, S. B., & Cox, R. (2015). Creating a prosthetic hand: 3D printers innovate and inspire a maker movement. Science and Children, 53, 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & education. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit-Brits, C., & van Zyl, C.-M. (2017). Self-directed learning characteristics: Making learning personal, empowering and successful. Africa Education Review, 14, 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1267576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M. (2013). 3D printing for children: What to build next? International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Scharff, E. (1998). Learning technologies in support of self-directed learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/1998-4

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garas, M., Vaccarezza, M., Newland, G., McVay-Doornbusch, K., & Hasani, J. (2018). 3D-printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: A pilot study. Annals of Anatomy, 219, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (2016). The effects of 3D printing in design thinking and design education. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(4), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2014-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gureckis, T. M., & Markant, D. (2012). Self-directed learning: A cognitive and computational perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanover Research (2017). The Digital Divide: Technology Integration in School Districts. Retrieved from https://www.hanoverresearch.com/reports-and-briefs/research-brief-the-digital-divide-technology-integration-in-school-districts/

  • Hanover Research (2019). Trends in K-12 Education. Retrieved from https://www.hanoverresearch.com/reports-and-briefs/trends-k-12-education-2019/

  • Horowitz, S. S., & Schultz, P. H. (2014). Printing space: Using 3D printing of digital terrain models in geosciences education and research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1987). Synthesizing mathematical conceptions and their formalization through the construction of logo-based school mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 18, 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739870180411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, J.-C., Lin, C.-Y., Zhuo, P.-W., & Lin, K.-Y. (2019). Using 3D printing technology with experiential learning strategies to improve preengineering students’ comprehension of abstract scientific concepts and hands-on ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T.-C., & Lin, C.-Y. (2017). From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. M. (2017). Digital making with “at-risk” youth. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-08-2016-0037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., Wu, Y., Xing, W., Guo, S., & Zhu, L. (2020). The role of self-directed learning in studying 3D design and modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855208

  • Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about using maker activities in formal K-12 educational settings: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1318097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsioloudis, P. & Jones, M. (2015). Using computer-aided design software and 3D printers to improve spatial visualization. Technology and engineering teacher, 14-20.

  • Kaya, E., Newley, A., Yesilyurt, E., & Deniz, H. (2019). Improving preservice elementary teachers’ engineering teaching efficacy beliefs with 3D design and printing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48, 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2015). Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loy, J. (2014). eLearning and eMaking: 3D printing blurring the digital and the physical. Education Sciences, 4, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4010108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L., Bowden, N. S., & Merrill, C. (2014). 3D printing in technology and engineering education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 30–35.

  • McGahern, P., Bosch, F., & Poli, D. (2015). Enhancing learning using 3D printing: An alternative to traditional project methods. The American Biology Teacher, 77, 376–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical sciences education, 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475.

  • Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 1-18). San Francisco: Jossey-bass publishers.

  • Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. In S. Brookfield (Ed.), Self-directed learning: From theory to practice (pp. 17–30). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemorin, S., & Selwyn, N. (2017). Making the best of it? Exploring the realities of 3D printing in school. Research Papers in Education, 32, 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R., & Clayson, J. (2015). Reconstructing constructionism. Constructivists Foundations, 10(3).

  • Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, A., & Priavolou, C. (2017). 3D printing as a means of learning and communication: The 3Ducation project revisited. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1972a). Teaching children thinking. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 9, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800720990503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1972b). Teaching children to be mathematicians versus teaching about mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 3, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739700030306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp, I., Tornai, R., & Zichar, M. (2016). What 3D printing technologies can bring to education: The impacts of acquiring a 3D printer. Proceedings from 7th IEEE international conference on cognitive Infocommunications.

  • Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society, 27, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratto, M. & Ree, R. (2012). Materializing information: 3D printing and social change. First Monday, 17. Retrieved from: https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3968/3273

  • Schelly, C., Anzalone, G., Wijnen, B., & Pearce, J. M. (2015). Open-source 3D printing technologies for education: Bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 28, 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiar, K., & Mendez, J. D. (2016). Creating and using interactive, 3-D printed models to improve student comprehension of the Bohr model of the atom, bond polarity, and hybridization. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1591–1594. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2018). Children’s negotiations of visualization skills during a design-based learning experience using nondigital and digital techniques. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangl, A., Kim, J., & Yeh, T. (2014). 3D printed tactile picture books for children with visual impairments: A design probe. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (January 2017), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610482

  • Stone, B., Kay, D., Reynolds, A., & Brown, D. (2020). 3D printing and service learning: Accessible open educational resources for students with visual impairment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(2), 336–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Li, Q. (2017). The application of 3D printing in mathematics education. Proceedings from the 12th international conference on Computer Science & Education.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. & Li, Q. (2018). The application of 3D printing in STEM education. In Meen, prior, & lam (Eds.), IEEE international conference on applied system innovation 2018.

  • Tekkol, I. A., & Demirel, M. (2018). An investigation of self-directed learning skills of undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., & Maloy, R. W. (2017). Why 3D print? The 21st-century skills students develop while engaging in 3D printing projects. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 34, 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1384684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. (2018). Learning through making: Emerging and expanding designs for college classes. TechTrends, 62, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, H., Resch, G., Southwick, D., McEwen, R., Dubé, A. K., & Record, I. (2017). Using 3D printing to enhance understanding and engagement with young audiences: Lessons from workshops in a museum. Curator: The Museum Journal, 60, 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., Shaw, D., Gaidos, K., Lyman, G., & Sorey, T. (2018). 3D pit stop printing: A student competition supports engineering design. Science and Children, 55, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh, M. P., Cazan, A.-M., Ierardi, E., & Jacić, L. A. (2017). Facilitating self-directed learning (SDL) and satisfaction among pre-university students. Educational Studies, 43, 584–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational & Counselling Psychology, McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC, H3A 1Y2, Canada

    Heather Ann Pearson & Adam Kenneth Dubé

Authors
  1. Heather Ann Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam Kenneth Dubé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Kenneth Dubé.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pearson, H.A., Dubé, A.K. 3D printing as an educational technology: theoretical perspectives, learning outcomes, and recommendations for practice. Educ Inf Technol 27, 3037–3064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10733-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10733-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation