Skip to main content
Log in

Usability heuristics for mobile learning applications

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heuristic evaluation is a fast and easy way to detect usability problems. Nielsen (1994) proposed ten heuristics that are being widely used to conduct heuristic evaluation. Utilizing these heuristics for mobile learning applications is not very effective because they are generic and were not developed taking mobile devices into consideration. In this research new heuristics were developed to extend Nielsen (1994) heuristics to support heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications. Sixteen usability studies on mobile learning applications were retrieved from the literature, the listed usability problems were analyzed and three new heuristics were developed. The validation results indicate that using newly developed heuristics allow evaluators to detect more usability problems while evaluating mobile learning applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade, F. O., Nascimento, L. N., Wood, G. A., & Calil, S. J. (2015). Applying heuristic evaluation on medical devices user manuals. Paper presented at the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, June 7–12, 2015, Toronto, Canada, 1515–1518.

  • Arain, A. A., Hussain, Z., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2016). Evaluating usability of M-learning application in the context of higher education institute. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, 259–268.

  • Armstrong, P., & Wilkinson, B. (2016). Preliminary usability testing of ClaMApp: A classroom management app for tablets. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 654–656.

  • Bertini, E., Catarci, T., Dix, A., Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S., & Santucci, G. (2009). Appropriating heuristic evaluation for mobile computing. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 1(1), 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

  • Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetaji, M., & Fetaji, B. (2011). Comparing developed MLUAT (mobile learning usability attribute testing) methodology with qualitative user testing method and heuristics evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 516–523.

  • Gray, W. D., & Salzman, M. C. (1998). Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(3), 203–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, R. A., Bennett, A. G., Fernheimer, J. W., Geisler, C., Krull, R., Lutzky, R. A., et al. (2013). Heuristics for broader assessment of effectiveness and usability in technology-mediated technical communication. Technical Communication, 60(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, A. S., & Ahmad, W. F. W. (2012). A comparison of architectures for a usability-aware customized mobile learning management system (CMLMS). Paper presented at the Computer Modeling and Simulation (EMS), 2012 Sixth UKSim/AMSS European Symposium On, 511–516.

  • Hashim, A. S., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Ahmad, R. (2011). Mobile learning course content application as a revision tool: The effectiveness and usability. Paper presented at the Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics (ICPAIR), 2011 International Conference On, , 2 184–187.

  • Heng, L. E., Sangodiah, A., & Ahmad, Wan Fatimah Bt Wan. (2012). End user's perspective of usability in mobile learning system. Paper presented at the Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), 2012 International Conference On, , 2 1095–1098.

  • Hewett, T. T., Baecker, R., Card, S., Carey, T., Gasen, J., Mantei, M., .Verplank, W. (1992). ACM SIGCHI curricula for human-computer interaction ACM.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanc, D., Vasiu, R., & Onita, M. (2012). Usability evaluation of a LMS mobile web interface. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, 348–361.

  • Kumar, B. A., & Hussein, S. (2014). Heuristic based user interface evaluation of mobile money application: A case study. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research (IJHCR), 5(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B. A., & Mohite, P. (2016). Usability guideline for mobile learning apps: An empirical study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(4), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuparinen, L., Silvennoinen, J., & Isomäki, H. (2013). Introducing usability heuristics for mobile map applications. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference, August 25 30, 2013, Dresden, Germany, ISBN 978-1-907075-06-3,

  • Lee, J. H. (2014). Development and usability assessment of tablet-based synchronous mobile learning system. Ubiquitous Information Technologies And Applications, 301–306 Springer.

  • Li, Q., Wang, T., Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Case study of usability testing methodology on mobile learning course.

  • Masood, M., & Thigambaram, M. (2015). The usability of mobile applications for pre-schoolers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1818–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mtebe, J. S., & Kissaka, M. M. (2015). Heuristics for evaluating usability of learning management systems in africa. Paper presented at the IST-Africa Conference, 2015, 1–13.

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering Elsevier.

  • Nielsen, J. (2003). Introduction to usability. Usability 101: Introduction to Usability,

  • Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249–256.

  • Omar, H. M., & Jaafar, A. (2010). Heuristics evaluation in computer games. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management: Exploring the Invisible World, CAMP'10,

  • Pinelle, D., Wong, N., & Stach, T. (2008). Heuristic evaluation for games: usability principles for video game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1453–1462). ACM.

  • Pinelle, D., Wong, N., Stach, T., & Gutwin, C. (2009). Usability heuristics for networked multiplayer games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 169–178.

  • Quiñones, D., & Rusu, C. (2017). How to develop usability heuristics: A systematic literature review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 53, 89–122.

  • Sánchez, J., & Espinoza, M. (2011). mGuides, design and usability of a mobile system to assist learning in critical situations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 415–424.

  • Sánchez, J., Flores, H., & Sáenz, M. (2008). Mobile science learning for the blind. Paper presented at the CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3201–3206.

  • Wei, J., Zhuo, J., & Zhang, H. (2008). Development of a mobile learning model with usability features for online education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimal Aklesh Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

 

Authors

Year

Title, Source, Publisher.

1

Armstrong and Wilkinson

2016

Preliminary usability testing of ClaMApp: a classroom management app for tablets, OzCHI ‘16 Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM.

2

Kumar and Mohite

2016

Usability guideline for mobile learning apps: an empirical study, International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, Inderscience.

3

Arain et al.

2016

Evaluating Usability of M-Learning Application in the Context of Higher Education Institute, International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, SpringerLink.

4

Masood and Thigambaram

2015

The Usability of Mobile Applications for Pre-schoolers, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier.

5

Lee

2014

Development and Usability Assessment of Tablet Based Synchronouous Mobile Learning System, Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications, SpringerLink.

6

Hashim and Ahmad

2012

A Comparison of Architectures for a usability- Aware Customized Mobile Learning Management System (CMLMS), 2012 Sixth UKSim/AMSS European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, IEEE.

7

Heng et al.

2012

End User’s Perspective of Usability in Mobile Learning System, 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), IEEE.

8

Ivanc et al.

2012

Usability evaluation of a LMS mobile web interface, International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, Springer Link.

9

Li et al.

2011

Case Study of Usability Testing Methodology on Mobile Learning Course, 2011 International Conference on Advanced Intelligence and Awareness Internet (AIAI 2011), IET (The Institution of Engineering and Technology).

10

Fetaji and Fetaji

2011

Comparing Developed MLUAT (Mobile Learning Usability Attribute Testing) Methodology with qualitative user Testing method and Heuristic Evaluation, CompSysTech ‘11 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, ACM.

11

Hashim et al.

2011

Mobile Learning Course content Application as a Revision Tool: The Effectiveness and Usability, 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligence Robotics, IEEE.

12

Hashim et al.

2011

Usability Study of Mobile Learning Course Content Applications as a revision tool, Second International Visual Informatics Conference, Springer Link.

13

Sánchez and Espinoza

2011

mGuides, Design and Usability of a mobile System to Assist Learning in Critical Situations, International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Springer Link.

14

Sánchez et al.

2008

Mobile Science Learning for the Blind, CHI EA ‘08 CHI ‘08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM.

15

Wei et al.

2008

Development of a mobile learning model with usability features for online education, International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, Inderscience.

16

Corlett et al.

2005

Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Wiley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, B.A., Goundar, M.S. Usability heuristics for mobile learning applications. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1819–1833 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09860-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09860-z

Keywords

Navigation