This paper introduces system dynamics modeling to understand, visualize and explore technology integration in schools, through the development of a theoretical model of technology-related change in teachers’ practice. Technology integration is a dynamic social practice, within the social system of education. It is difficult, if not nearly impossible, for the human mind to fully conceptualize complex social systems. Therefore, it is necessary to use conceptual frameworks designed to examine these phenomena. The model presented in this paper draws together known factors of integration and findings from a large-scale technology initiative in Australia to create a preliminary casual-loop model of technology integration in secondary school teaching. The preliminary model illustrates feedback and multiple effects in the system of education. The use of system models can potentially support a shift from focusing on teachers’ technology use to student outcomes, and the feedback loop of students’ technology use on teachers’ practice. Implications for technology integration, teacher change and learning are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alessi, S. (2000). The application of system dynamics in elementary and secondary school curricular. Retrieved from http://www.c5.cl/ieinvestiga/actas/ribie2000/charlas/alessi.htm.
Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher moral, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39, 395–414. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1.
Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 3–7. doi:10.1177/0022487108328488.
De Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2004). Emergence versus self-organisation: Different concepts but promising when combined. In Engineering self-organising systems (pp. 1–15). Berlin: Springer.
Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Gleizes, M.-P., & Karageorgos, A. (2006). Self-organisation and emergence in MAS: an overview. Informatica, 30(1), 45–54.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–62.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–40.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
Finnigan, J. (2005). The science of complex systems. Australasian Science, 26(5), 32–34.
Forrester, J. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behaviour of social systems. Technology Review, 73(3), 52–68.
Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 245–256. doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100211.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. U. E. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192. doi:10.1080/0022027032000276961.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
Hirsch, G., Levine, R., & Miller, R. (2007). Using system dynamics modeling to understand the impact of social change initiatives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(3–4), 239–253. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9114-3.
Howard, S. K., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2015). More than beliefs: Subject areas and teachers’ integration of laptops in secondary teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 360–369. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12139
Howard, S. K., & Mozejko, A. (2013). DER-NSW Evaluation: Conclusions on student and teacher engagement and ICT use. Sydney: Department of Education and Communities, NSW.
Howard, S. K., & Thompson, K. (2013). Systems of integration: Using system dynamics to understand technology integration in learning and teaching. In European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Munich, Germany.
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010a). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004.
Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010b). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.
Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in school around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC) and Springer.
Lei, J. (2010). Quantity versus quality: a new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 455–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00961.x.
Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: a longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49(2), 284–296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013.
Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59–68.
Limburg, K. E., O’Neil, R. V., Costanza, R., & Farber, S. (2002). Complex systems and valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 409–420.
Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1–30. doi:10.2190/EC.46.1.a.
Morecroft, J. (2007). Strategic modelling and business dynamics. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.
Ossimitz, G. (1997). The development of systems thinking skills using system dynamics modeling tools. Klagenfurt. Retrieved from http://wwwu.uni-klu.ac.at/gossimit/sdyn/gdm_eng.htm.
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:10.2307/4531523.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. doi:10.3102/0034654310393361.
Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the intention to use technology by preservice teachers: an empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178–188. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.581892.
Thompson, K., & Reimann, P. (2010). Patterns of use of an agent-based model and a system dynamics model: The application of patterns of use and the impacts on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 54(2), 392–403.
Tondeur, J., Cooper, M., & Newhouse, C. P. (2010). From ICT coordination to ICT integration: a longitudinal case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 296–306. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00351.x.
Tondeur, J., Kershaw, L. H., Vanderline, R., & van Braak, J. (2013). Getting inside the black box of technology integration in education: teachers’ stimulated recall of classroom observations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 434–448.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. doi:10.3102/0091732x09349791.
Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: the interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205. doi:10.3102/00028312039001165.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teacher College Record, 104(3), 482–515.
About this article
Cite this article
Howard, S.K., Thompson, K. Seeing the system: Dynamics and complexity of technology integration in secondary schools. Educ Inf Technol 21, 1877–1894 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9424-2
- Technology integration
- Educational change
- Complex systems
- Dynamic systems
- Systems thinking