Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in the basic ICT skills of freshmen between 2005 and 2009: Who’s catching up and who’s still behind?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, ICT use has expanded enormously in most Western countries. In line with this development, we hypothesised that freshmen at university would not only have mastered more ICT skills, but would also use computers more often than their counterparts of 5 years previously. To compare students’ opinions and behaviour between 2005 and 2009, responses to two online questionnaires (N = 714 in 2005 and N = 1529 in 2009) offered at a large university were compared. The main variables of the Technology Acceptance Model (as well as facilitating factors, study motivation and some contextual variables) were used as predictors to explore the possible changes between 2005 and 2009 in the mastering of 19 ICT skills, and the frequency of the use of computers for six different tasks. The results of the study show that freshmen became more proficient in some ICT skills, while proficiency in other skills did not change or even dropped. Gender is still an important factor to predict ICT skills and the frequency of using computers, but it is shown that for some skills female students have caught up with their male counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This design allowed us to study changes in students’ ICT-related opinions and behaviours during the first 6 months of attending an academic institution (Verhoeven et al. 2010).

References

  • Broom, L., Selznick, P., & Broom, D. (1984). Essentials of sociology. Itasca, Illinois 60143: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.

  • Bruneel, S., Elen, J., De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2011). Study and non-study related technologies use of Flemish students in higher education. In K. Moyle, & G. Wijngaard (Ed.), Student reactions to learning with technologies: Perceptions and outcomes . Hershey (PA) IGI Global (forthcoming).

  • Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvönen, K., Puhaikanen, P., & Walden, P. (2006). Adoption of mobile devices/services—searching for answers with the UTAUT. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences—2006. http://www2.computer.org/plugins/dl/pdf/proceedings/hicss/2006/2507/06/250760132a.pdf?template=1&loginState=1&userData=anonymous-IP%253A%253A127.0.0.1. Accessed 6 March 2010.

  • Castells, E., & Kreisler, H. (2001). Identity and change in the network society. http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people/Castells/castells-con4.html. Accessed 6 March 2010.

  • Chandra, V., & Lloyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00790.x.

  • Chatzoglou, P. D., Sarigiannidis, L., Vraimaki, E., & Diamantidis, A. (2009). Investigating Greek employees’ intention to use web-based training. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, A., & Comber, C. (2003). Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: what has changed? Educational Research. doi:10.1080/0013188032000103235.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Information Technology Literacy (National Research Council) (1999). Free executive summary being fluent with information technology. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6482&page=41. Accessed 6 March 2010.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, (September), 319–340.

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empirica (2007). Benchmarking in a policy perspective. Report n° 6: Digital Literacy and ICT skills. Bonn: Empirica. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/wp6_digital_literacy_and_ict_skills.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2011.

  • Eurostat (2010). Statistics. Information Society. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/information_society/data/main_tables. Accessed 20 March 2010.

  • Eynon, R. (2008). The use of the World Wide Web in learning and teaching in higher education: reality and rhetoric. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. doi:10.1080/14703290701757401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillion, G., Mimayem, M., Laferrière, T., & Mantha, R. (2009). Integrating information and communication technologies into higher education: investigating onsite and online students’ points of view. Open Learning. doi:10.1080/02680510903201649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, K., Switzer, J., & Gloeckner, G. (2009). Workforce readiness: a study of university students’ fluency with information technology. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: an extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A., Margaryan, A., & Vojt, G. (2010). Exploring students’ use of ICT and expectations of learning methods. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 8(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losh, S. C. (2004). Gender, education, and occupational digital gaps 1983–2002. Social Science Computer Review. doi:10.1177/0894439303262557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancinelli, E. (2008). e-Inclusion in the Information Society. In R. Pinter (Ed.), Information Society. From theory to political practice. Coursebook (pp. 171–182). Budapest: Gondolat-Uj Mandatum. http://www.ittk.hu/netis/doc/NETIS_Course_Book_English.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2011.

  • McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task-technology view of learning management system impact. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • OIVO (Onderzoeks-en Informatiecentrum van de Verbruikersorganisaties) (2010). Jongeren en Internet. http://www.crioc.be/files/nl/4689nl.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2010.

  • Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ internet use: testing the “disappearing digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach. Poetics. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouratashi, M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2010). Analysis of factors influencing application of ICT by agricultural graduate students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.21230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salajan, F. D. (2008). The rise of the information society amongst European academics. European Journal of Education, 43(4), 457–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., et al. (2009). Technology’s effect on achievement in higher education: a Stage I meta-analysis of classroom applications. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9021-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (1997). Students’ attitudes toward computers: validation of a computer attitude scale for 16–19 education. Computers & Education, 28(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socialbakers (2011). Belgium facebook statistics . http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/belgium/last-week#chart-intervals. Accessed 18 February 2011.

  • Strømsø, H. I., Grottum, P., & Lycke, K. H. (2004). Changes in student approaches to learning with the introduction of computer-supported problem-based learning. Medical Education. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01786.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. (1991). Equity and computers in school: a decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y. H., Cheng, C. J., & Sun, S. Y. (2009). What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: a multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Braak, J. P. (2004). Domains and determinants of university students self-perceived computer competence. Computers & Education, 43(3), 299–312. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bragt, C. A. C., Bakx, A. W. E. E., Bergen, T. C. M., & Croon, M. A. (2011). Looking for students’ personal characteristics predicting study outcome. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9325-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society. doi:10.1080/01972240390227895.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, J. C., Heerwegh, D., & De Wit, K. (2010). Information and communication technologies in the life of University Freshmen: an analysis of change. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. (1994). Scoring key for the inventory of learning styles (ILS) in higher education. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viherä, M., & Nurmela, J. (2001). Communication capability as an intrinsic determinant for the information age. Futures, 33(3–4), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: the second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613–634. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516100. Accessed 10 March 2010.

  • Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Tao, Y., & Yang, P. (2007). Using UTAUT to explore the behavior of 3G mobile communication users. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE IEEM, 199–203. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ielx5/4419130/4419131/04419179.pdf?arnumber=4419179. Accessed 3 March 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office for Educational Policy, University of Leuven, Krakenstraat 3 bus 5200, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Kurt De Wit

  2. Business & Decision Life Sciences, Sint-Lambertusstraat 141, 1200, Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium

    Dirk Heerwegh

  3. Centre for Sociological Research, University of Leuven, Parkstraat 45 bus 3601, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Jef C. Verhoeven

Authors
  1. Kurt De Wit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Heerwegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jef C. Verhoeven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt De Wit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Wit, K., Heerwegh, D. & Verhoeven, J.C. Changes in the basic ICT skills of freshmen between 2005 and 2009: Who’s catching up and who’s still behind?. Educ Inf Technol 17, 205–231 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9154-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9154-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation