Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An exploration of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with irinotecan in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background. Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and irinotecan are treatment options for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, but their efficacies are limited. We investigated the combination of FTD/TPI and irinotecan for such patients. Methods. Patients who were refractory to fluoropyrimidine, platinum and taxane were enrolled into four cohorts (Level 1A/1B/2A/2B) and treated with irinotecan (100 [Level 1] or 125 [Level 2] mg/m2 on days 1 and 15) and FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2/dose, twice daily, on days 1–5 and 8–12 [Level A] or on days 1–5 and days 15–19 [Level B]) of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); the secondary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR). Results. Eleven patients were enrolled: 2 at Level 1A, 3 at Level 1B, and 6 at Level 2B. DLTs occurred in 2/2 patients at Level 1A and 2/6 patients at Level 2B. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (90.9%), leukopenia (54.5%), anemia (45.5%) and febrile neutropenia (18.2%). One patient at Level 2B achieved a partial response, and the DCR was 72.7% (95% CI, 39.0%-94.0%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 3.0 months (95% CI, 0.92-not reached) and 10.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-not reached), respectively. Conclusion. The RP2D of FTD/TPI combined with irinotecan was determined to be Level 1B; this level was associated with manageable hematologic toxicities and feasible non-hematologic toxicities. Further evaluation of the efficacy of RP2D treatment is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. Epub 2018/09/13. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492. PubMed PMID: 30207593

  2. Hironaka S, Ueda S, Yasui H, Nishina T, Tsuda M, Tsumura T et al (2013) Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J clinical oncol: official j Am Soc Clinical Oncol 31(35):4438–44. Epub 2013/11/06. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5805. PubMed PMID: 24190112

  3. Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. The lancet oncol 15(11):1224–35. Epub 2014/09/23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6. PubMed PMID: 25240821

  4. Shitara K, Takashima A, Fujitani K, Koeda K, Hara H, Nakayama N et al (2017) Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. The lancet Gastroenterol hepatol 2(4):277–87. Epub 2017/04/14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30219-9. PubMed PMID: 28404157

  5. Bando H, Shimodaira H, Fujitani K, Takashima A, Yamaguchi K, Nakayama N et al (2018) A phase II study of nab-paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 91:86–91. Epub 2018/01/22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.032. PubMed PMID: 29353164

  6. Shitara K, Doi T, Dvorkin M, Mansoor W, Arkenau HT, Prokharau A et al (2018) Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The lancet oncol 19(11):1437–48. Epub 2018/10/26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30739-3. PubMed PMID: 30355453

  7. Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, Ryu MH, Chao Y, Kato K et al (2017) Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538–12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390(10111):2461–71. Epub 2017/10/11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31827-5. PubMed PMID: 28993052

  8. Nishimura T, Iwasa S, Nagashima K, Okita N, Takashima A, Honma Y et al (2017) Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, and taxanes. Gastric Cancer 20(4):655–62. Epub 2016/11/20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0670-9. PubMed PMID: 27858180

  9. Shitara K, Bang YJ, Iwasa S, Sugimoto N, Ryu MH, Sakai D et al (2020) Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer. N Engl J Med 382(25):2419–30. Epub 2020/05/30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2004413. PubMed PMID: 32469182

  10. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet376(9742):687–97. Epub 2010/08/24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. PubMed PMID: 20728210

  11. Emura T, Nakagawa F, Fujioka A, Ohshimo H, Yokogawa T, Okabe H et al (2004) An optimal dosing schedule for a novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, based on its intracellular metabolism and its incorporation into DNA. Int J Mol Med 13(2):249–255 (Epub 2004/01/14 PubMed PMID: 14719131)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doi T, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T, Boku N, Onozawa Y, Fukutomi A et al (2012) Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer 107(3):429–34. Epub 2012/06/28. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.274. PubMed PMID: 22735906; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3405214

  13. Bando H, Doi T, Muro K, Yasui H, Nishina T, Yamaguchi K et al (2016) A multicenter phase II study of TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1201). Eur J Cancer 62:46–53. Epub 2016/05/23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.009. PubMed PMID: 27208903

  14. Emura T, Murakami Y, Nakagawa F, Fukushima M, Kitazato K (2004) A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 13(4):545–549 (Epub 2004/03/11 PubMed PMID: 15010854)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Bichev D, Deist T, Hinke A, Breithaupt K et al (2011) Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur J Cancer. 47(15):2306–14. Epub 2011/07/12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.002. PubMed PMID: 21742485

  16. Kang JH, Lee SI, Lim DH, Park KW, Oh SY, Kwon HC et al (2012) Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone. J clinical oncol: official j Am Soc Clinical Oncol 30(13):1513–8. Epub 2012/03/14. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4585. PubMed PMID: 22412140

  17. Makiyama A, Arimizu K, Hirano G, Makiyama C, Matsushita Y, Shirakawa T et al (2018) Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line or later treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 21(3):464–72. Epub 2017/08/12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0759-9. PubMed PMID: 28799048

  18. Nukatsuka M, Nakagawa F, Saito H, Sakata M, Uchida J, Takechi T (2015) Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, with irinotecan hydrochloride on human colorectal and gastric cancer xenografts. Anticancer Res 35(3):1437–1445 (Epub 2015/03/10 PubMed PMID: 25750295)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takashi Nishimura SI, Nagashima K, Okita N, Takashima A, Honma Y, Kato K, Hamaguchi K, Yamada Y, Shimada Y, Boku N (2014) Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, and taxanes. Gastric cancer : official j Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Japanese Gastric Cancer Assoc. Epub 2016 Nov 17. [Epub ahead of print]

  20. Temmink OH, Hoebe EK, Fukushima M, Peters GJ (2007) Irinotecan-induced cytotoxicity to colon cancer cells in vitro is stimulated by pre-incubation with trifluorothymidine. Eur J Cancer 43(1):175–83. Epub 2006/10/20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.022. PubMed PMID: 17049227

  21. Doi T, Yoshino T, Fuse N, Boku N, Yamazaki K, Koizumi W et al (2015) Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Investigational new drugs 33(5):1068–77. Epub 2015/07/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0271-1. PubMed PMID: 26163340; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4768213

  22. Tomohiro Nishina TY ES, Yamazaki K, Komatsu Y, Baba H, Tsuji A, Yamaguchi K, Muro K, Sugimoto N, Tsuji Y, Moriwaki T, Esaki T, Hamada C, Tanase T, Ohtsu A (2016) Onset of neutropenia as an indicator of treatment response in the randomized phase II of TAS-102 vs placebo in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (Study J003–10040030). J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3557)

  23. Atsushi Ohtsu TY AF, Garcia-Carbonero R, Argiles G, Alberto FS, Peeters M, Makris L, Benedetti F, Zaniboni A, Shimada Y, Yamazaki K, Komatsu Y, Howard SH, Lenz H-J, Tran B, Wahba M, Yoshida K, Cutsem EV, Robert JM (2016) Onset of neutropenia as an indicator of treatment response in the phase III RECOURSE trial of TAS-102 vs placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3556)

  24. Satake H, Kato T, Oba K, Kotaka M, Kagawa Y, Yasui H et al (2020) Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study). Oncologist 25(12):e1855-e63. Epub 2020/07/16. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0643. PubMed PMID: 32666647

  25. Varghese AM, Cardin DB, Hersch J, Benson AB, Hochster HS, Makris L et al (2020) Phase I Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Irinotecan and Bevacizumab in Advanced Gastrointestinal Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 26(7):1555–62. Epub 2020/01/12. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2743. PubMed PMID: 31924737

  26. Muro K, Boku N, Shimada Y, Tsuji A, Sameshima S, Baba H et al (2010) Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study). Lancet Oncol 11(9):853–60. Epub 2010/08/17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70181-9. PubMed PMID: 20708966

  27. Kawakami T, Machida N, Yasui H, Kawahira M, Kawai S Kito Y et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78(4):809–14. Epub 2016/08/28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3138-z. PubMed PMID: 27566700

  28. Bang YJ, Ruiz EY, Van Cutsem E, Lee KW, Wyrwicz L, Schenker M et al (2018) Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300. Ann Oncol 29(10):2052–60. Epub 2018/07/28. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy264. PubMed PMID: 30052729; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6225815

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Funding

This investigation was funded by TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Patient recruitment was performed by Takuro Mizukami, Keiko Minashi, Hiroki Hara, Tomohiro Nishina, Yusuke Amanuma, Naoki Takahashi, Akio Nakasha, Masaki Takahashi, and Takako Eguchi Nakajima. Data collection and analysis were performed by Masaki Takahashi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Takuro Mizukami and Takako Eguchi Nakajima. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takako Eguchi Nakajima.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All considerations regarding the protection of human subjects were performed in accordance with the ICH Harmonized Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, the ethical principles of which originate from the Declaration of Helsinki, and all applicable regulatory requirements.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Mizukami reports grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and Ono pharmaceutical as well as personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceutical. Dr. Hara grants, and personal fees from Bayer, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono, and Taiho, as well as grants from Astellas, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Elevar Therapeutics, GSK, Incyte, Pfizer, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Sanofi, and Yakult. Dr. Nakajima reports grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Amgen, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Sanofi K.K., Nippon Kayaku Co., MSD K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Merck Serono Co. as well as a grant from Eisai Co., and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis Japan, Bayer Yakuhin, Pfizer Japan Inc., Yakult Honsha Co., Nipro Co, Celltrion Healthcare Japan, Teijin Pharma, Sawai Pharmaceutical Co.. Drs. Minashi, Nishina, Amanuma, Naoki Takahashi, Nakasya, Masaki Takahashi have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizukami, T., Minashi, K., Hara, H. et al. An exploration of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with irinotecan in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer. Invest New Drugs 40, 614–621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01223-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01223-9

Keywords

Navigation