Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inhibition of SHP2 by new compounds induces differential effects on RAS/RAF/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways in different cancer cell types

  • PRECLINICAL STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Kinases and phosphatases are important players in growth signaling and are involved in cancer development. For development of targeted cancer therapy, attention is given to kinases rather than phosphatases inhibitors. Src homology region 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase2 (SHP2) is overexpressed in different types of cancers. We investigated the SHP2-inhibitory effects of two new 5-aminosalicylate–4-thiazolinones in human cervical (HeLa) and breast (MCF-7 & MDA-MB-231) cancer cells. In-silico molecular docking showed preferential affinity of the two compounds towards the catalytic over the allosteric site of SHP2. An enzymatic assay confirmed the docking results whereby 0.01 μM of both compounds reduced SHP2 activity to 50%. On cellular level, the two compounds significantly reduced the expression of SHP2, KRAS, p-ERK and p-STAT3 in HeLa but not in the other two cell lines. Phosphorylation of AKT and JNK was enhanced in HeLa and MCF7. Both compounds exhibited anti-proliferative/anti-migratory effects on HeLa and MCF7 but not in MDA-MB-231 cells. These results indicate that inhibition of SHP2 and its downstream pathways by the two compounds might be a promising strategy for cancer therapy in some but not all cancer types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ventura J-J, Nebreda AR (2006) Protein kinases and phosphatases as therapeutic targets in cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 8:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-006-0005-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang J, Zhang F, Niu R (2015) Functions of Shp2 in cancer. J Cell Mol Med 19:2075–2083. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao S, Sedwick D, Wang Z (2014) Genetic alterations of protein tyrosine phosphatases in human cancers. Oncogene:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.326

  4. Han T, Xiang D-M, Sun W, Liu N, Sun H-L, Wen W, Shen W-F, Wang R-Y, Chen C, Wang X, Cheng Z, Li H-Y, Wu M-C, Cong W-M, Feng G-S, Ding J, Wang H-Y (2015) PTPN11/Shp2 overexpression enhances liver cancer progression and predicts poor prognosis of patients. J Hepatol 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.036

  5. Grossmann KS, Rosário M, Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W (2010) The tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 in development and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 106:53–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-230X(10)06002-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou XD, Agazie YM (2008) Inhibition of SHP2 leads to mesenchymal to epithelial transition in breast cancer cells. Cell Death Differ 15:988–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dance M, Montagner A, Salles JP, Yart A, Raynal P (2008) The molecular functions of Shp2 in the Ras/Mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2) pathway. Cell Signal 20:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.10.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Butterworth S, Overduin M, Barr AJ (2014) Targeting protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 for therapeutic intervention. Future Med Chem 6:1423–1437. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.14.88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Z, Zhao Y, Fang J, Cui R, Xiao Y, Xu Q, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Fang J, Cui R, Xiao Y, Xu Q (2017) SHP2 negatively regulates HLA-ABC and PD-L1 expression via STAT1 phosphorylation in prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 8:53518–53530. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18591

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aceto N, Sausgruber N, Brinkhaus H, Gaidatzis D, Martiny-Baron G, Mazzarol G, Confalonieri S, Quarto M, Hu G, Balwierz PJ, Pachkov M, Elledge SJ, van Nimwegen E, Stadler MB, Bentires-Alj M (2012) Tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 promotes breast cancer progression and maintains tumor-initiating cells via activation of key transcription factors and a positive feedback signaling loop. Nat Med 18:529–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu D, Pang Y, Ke Y, Yu J, He Z, Tautz L, Mustelin T, Ding S, Huang Z, Feng GS (2009) A conserved mechanism for control of human and mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation by Shp2 tyrosine phosphatase. PLoS One 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004914

  12. Chen Y-NP, LaMarche MJ, Chan HM, Fekkes P, Garcia-Fortanet J, Acker MG, Antonakos B, Chen CH-T, Chen Z, Cooke VG, Dobson JR, Deng Z, Fei F, Firestone B, Fodor M, Fridrich C, Gao H, Grunenfelder D, Hao H-X, Jacob J, Ho S, Hsiao K, Kang ZB, Karki R, Kato M, Larrow J, La Bonte LR, Lenoir F, Liu G, Liu S, Majumdar D, Meyer MJ, Palermo M, Perez L, Pu M, Price E, Quinn C, Shakya S, Shultz MD, Slisz J, Venkatesan K, Wang P, Warmuth M, Williams S, Yang G, Yuan J, Zhang J-H, Zhu P, Ramsey T, Keen NJ, Sellers WR, Stams T, Fortin PD (2016) Allosteric inhibition of SHP2 phosphatase inhibits cancers driven by receptor tyrosine kinases. Nature 535:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdu Allah HH, El Shorbagi ANA (2016) 5-Aminosalyclic Acid (5-ASA): A Unique Anti-Inflammatory Salicylate. Med Chem (Los Angeles) 6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0444.1000361

  14. Abdu-Allah HHM, Abdel-Moty SG, El-Awady R, El-Shorbagi ANA (2016) Design and synthesis of novel 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA)–4-thiazolinone hybrid derivatives with promising antiproliferative activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:1647–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trott O, Olson A (2010) AutoDock Vina: inproving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334.AutoDock

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Saleh EM, El-awady RA, Eissa NA, Abdel-Rahman WM (2012) Antagonism between curcumin and the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide: A study of DNA damage, cell cycle regulation and death pathways. Cancer Biol Ther 13:1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.21078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Justus CR, Leffler N, Ruiz-Echevarria M, Yang LV (2014) In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. J Vis Exp 752:e51046. https://doi.org/10.3791/51046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Awady RA, Saleh EM, Dahm-Daphi J (2010) Targeting DNA double-strand break repair: Is it the right way for sensitizing cells to 5-fluorouracil? Anti-Cancer Drugs 21:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0b013e328334b0ae

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. He R, Yu Z, Zhang R, Zhang Z (2014) Protein tyrosine phosphatases as potential therapeutic targets. Acta Pharmacol Sin 35:1227–1246. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2014.80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Prahallad A, Heynen GJJE, Germano G, Willems SM, Evers B, Vecchione L, Gambino V, Lieftink C, Beijersbergen RL, Di Nicolantonio F, Bardelli A, Bernards R (2015) PTPN11 Is a Central Node in Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance to Targeted Cancer Drugs. Cell Rep 12:1978–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schneeberger VE, Ren Y, Luetteke N, Huang Q, Chen L, Lawrence HR, Lawrence NJ, Haura EB, Koomen JM, Coppola D, Wu J (2015) Inhibition of Shp2 suppresses mutant EGFR-induced lung tumors in transgenic mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 6:6191–6202. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Eckert LB, Repasky GA, Ulkü AS, McFall A, Zhou H, Sartor CI, Der CJ (2004) Involvement of Ras activation in human breast cancer cell signaling, invasion, and anoikis. Cancer Res 64:4585–4592. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perera D, Venkitaraman AR (2016) Oncogenic KRAS triggers MAPK-dependent errors in mitosis and MYC-dependent sensitivity to anti-mitotic agents. Sci Rep 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29741

  24. Mendoza MC, Er EE, Blenis J (2011) The Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR pathways: Cross-talk and compensation. Trends Biochem Sci 36:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li X, Lu Y, Liang K, Liu B, Fan Z (2005) Differential responses to doxorubicin-induced phosphorylation and activation of Akt in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res 7:R589–R597. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X, Ma H, Li L, Chen Y, Sun X, Dong Z, Liu JY, Zhu W, Zhang JT (2018) Novel synthetic bisindolylmaleimide alkaloids inhibit STAT3 activation by binding to the SH2 domain and suppress breast xenograft tumor growth. Oncogene. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-017-0076-0

  27. Magi S, Tashiro E, Imoto M (2012) A chemical genomic study identifying diversity in cell migration signaling in cancer cells. Sci Rep 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00823

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by AlJalila Foundation for Medical Education and Research, United Arab Emirates [grant number. AJF201612]

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raafat El-Awady.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author CV declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author ES declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author WR declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author VM declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author AA declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author HT declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author HA declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author AE declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author RE declares that he has no conflict of interest

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vazhappilly, C., Saleh, E., Ramadan, W. et al. Inhibition of SHP2 by new compounds induces differential effects on RAS/RAF/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways in different cancer cell types. Invest New Drugs 37, 252–261 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0626-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0626-5

Keywords

Navigation