Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The diagnosis and assessment of visual function in Singaporean children with electrophysiology: 10-year results

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the clinical use and efficacy of electrophysiology in children.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of all children aged <16 years, who were referred to the Visual Electrophysiology Laboratory at the Singapore National Eye Center between 2003 and 2013.

Results

A total of 586 children, median age 8 years (range 0.15–16), were referred for a variety of reasons including investigation of poor vision (40 %), suspected retinal disease or optic nerve/cortical dysfunction (17 %), nystagmus (13 %) and screening or monitoring of a variety of ocular or neurological conditions (12 %). The number of children with vision 6/15 or worse was 418 (71 %), and 103 (18 %) had vision 6/120 or worse in at least one eye. The most common pathology noted was retinal dystrophy or dysfunction (41 %) or optic nerve/cortical dysfunction (12 %). In 30 %, visual electrophysiology was within normal limits, and in 6 %, a conclusive diagnosis could not be obtained.

Conclusion

Electrophysiology testing played an important role in the assessment of children and added to the clinical management of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Genderen M, Riemslag F, Jorritsma F, Hoeben F, Meire F, Stilma J (2006) The key role of electrophysiology in the diagnosis of visually impaired children. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:799–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Camuglia JE, Greer RM, Welch L, Gole GA (2011) Use of the electroretinogram in a paediatric hospital. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 39:506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parness-Yossifon R, Mets MB (2008) The electroretinogram in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:398–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hidajat RR, Goode DH (2001) The clinical value of ophthalmic electrodiagnosis in children. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 24:172–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bach M, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Marmor MF, Meigen T, Vaegan, Miyake Y (2000) Standard for pattern electroretinography. Int Soc Clin Electrophysiol Vis Doc Ophthalmol 101:11–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan (2010) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol 120:111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons JS, Marmor MF, McCulloch DL, Palmowski-Wolfe AM (2012) ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 124:1–13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M (2015) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol 130:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Population and Talent Division, P. M. S. O., Singapore Department of Statistics, Ministry of Home Affairs, Immigration and Checkpoints Authority. (2015) 2015 population in Brief, http://population.sg/population-in-brief/files/population-in-brief-2015.pdf

  10. Singapore MOH (2015) Health Facts Singapore

  11. Fulton AB, Brecelj J, Lorenz B, Moskowitz A, Thompson D, Westall CA (2006) Pediatric clinical visual electrophysiology: a survey of actual practice. Doc Ophthalmol 113:193–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brodie SE (2014) Tips and tricks for successful electroretinography in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:366–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brecelj J, Stirn-Kranjc B (2004) Visual electrophysiological screening in diagnosing infants with congenital nystagmus. Clin Neurophysiol 115:461–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Surachatkumtonekul T, Ruangvaravate N, Sriyakul C (2009) Visual electrophysiology in congenital nystagmus with normal fundus. J Med Assoc Thail 92:224–228

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grønskov K, Ek J, Brondum−Nielsen K (2007) Oculocutaneous albinism. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2(2):43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Harding GF, Robertson K, Spencer EL, Holliday I (2002) Vigabatrin; its effect on the electrophysiology of vision. Doc Ophthalmol 104:213–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammoudi DS, Lee SS, Madison A, Mirabella G, Buncic JR, Logan WJ, Snead OC, Westall CA (2005) Reduced visual function associated with infantile spasms in children on vigabatrin therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:514–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Westall CA, Wright T, Cortese F, Kumarappah A, Snead OC, Buncic JR (2014) Vigabatrin retinal toxicity in children with infantile spasms: an observational cohort study. Neurology 83(24):2262–2268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. AAPOS (2012) Vigabatrin: the problem of monitoring for peripheral vision loss in children. http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/504_vigabatrin_05.09.12.pdf

  20. Bain KE, Beatty S, Lloyd C (2000) Non-organic visual loss in children. Eye (Lond) 14(Pt 5):770–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raghunandan A, Buckingham RS (2008) The utility of clinical electrophysiology in a case of nonorganic vision loss. Optometry 79:436–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamel CP (2007) Cone rod dystrophies. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamel C (2006) Retinitis pigmentosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis 1:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Boycott KM, Sauve Y, MacDonald IM (1993) X-linked congenital stationary night blindness. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean LJH, Bird TD, Fong CT, Mefford HC, Smith RJH, Stephens K (eds) GeneReviews(R) University of Washington, Seattle University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved, Seattle, WA

  25. Kim JM, Payne JF, Yan J, Barnes CS (2012) Negative electroretinograms in the pediatric and adult population. Doc Ophthalmol 124:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor MJ, McCulloch DL (1992) Visual evoked potentials in infants and children. J Clin Neurophysiol 9:357–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andreasson S, Tornqvist K, Ehinger B (1993) Full-field electroretinograms during general anesthesia in normal children compared to examination with topical anesthesia. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 71:491–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Raitta C, Karhunen U, Seppalainen AM (1982) Changes in the electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials during general anaesthesia using enflurane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 218:294–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chin KC, Taylor MJ, Menzies R, Whyte H (1985) Development of visual evoked potentials in neonates. A study using light emitting diode goggles. Arch Dis Child 60:1166–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Brecelj J (2003) From immature to mature pattern ERG and VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 107:215–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lenassi E, Likar K, Stirn-Kranjc B, Brecelj J (2008) VEP maturation and visual acuity in infants and preschool children. Doc Ophthalmol 117:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna C. S. Tan.

Ethics declarations

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

This study including a waiver of consent due to the retrospective nature of the study was approved by the Singhealth Central Institutional Research Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, A.C.S., Chen, L., Png, R. et al. The diagnosis and assessment of visual function in Singaporean children with electrophysiology: 10-year results. Doc Ophthalmol 132, 189–199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9539-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9539-9

Keywords

Navigation