Skip to main content
Log in

Greenwashing and managing focos rojos in rural Mexico

  • Published:
Dialectical Anthropology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. “…those who propagate the semblance of liberation which only covers up the reality of capitalist perversion…” (Žižek 2012: 18). Even though this is Žižek’s definition of “scroundels,” I find it more than apt for “progressives.”

  2. Mostly but not restricted to those who were students (high school, professional and university) and active politically in 1968 in Mexico.

  3. Literally, red iridescent points—meaning to locate and focus a specific plan for its expansion over space and time—also referred as “foquismo” in other parts of Latin America.

  4. The countryside: not as a descriptive or analytical category but as a political representation in which simpler folk lived in agrarian communities abiding the Agrarian Law and based their interactions on peasant codes of reciprocity and solidarity.

  5. Quoted from Eduardo Batalha Viveiros de Castro’s Kenote address “Immanence and Fear, Or, The Enemy First” to the CASCA Anual Meeting in Toronto, 2007.

  6. Those entitled to and derived rights in an agrarian community of communal land tenure.

  7. The 6-year period that the president and governors hold office and for which there is no consecutive re-election.

  8. “Common law” for municipalities, written by cosmopolitan intellectuals and local politicians but justified as the collective will of “millennial” consuetudinary practices of allegedly pre-colonial indigenous origin. Even though most of the “indigenous” features correspond to the colonial period and most of the municipal territorial division dates back to the revolutionary period, the relevance of an “indigenous actor” is a neoliberal byproduct of electoral struggles in recent sexenios.

  9. Land grants issued by the revolutionary state to be worked collectively. They differ from communal lands because, among other things, the origin of these later has to be found in royal grants by the Crown during the colony.

  10. PROCEDE (Programa de Certificación de Derechos Ejidales y Titulación de Solares Urbanos), a certification program of land grant rights for the countryside and the issuing of urban lots.

References

  • Doane, Molly. 2012. Stealing shining rivers. Agrarian conflict, market logic and conservation in a Mexican forest. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara, Ernesto Ché. 1961. 1997 Guerra de guerrillas. Hondarribia: Hiru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Charles. 2002. Does multiculturalism menace? Governance, cultural rights and the politics of identity in Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies 34: 485–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recondo, David. 2007. La política del gatopardo. Multiculturalismo y democracia en Oaxaca. DF: CIESAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • León, V.L. 2010. Multitud y distopía, Ensayos sobre la nueva condición étnica en Michoacán. México: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. NY: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo F. Macip.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macip, R.F. Greenwashing and managing focos rojos in rural Mexico. Dialect Anthropol 38, 95–104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9332-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9332-7

Navigation