Abstract
Background
Digital rectal examination should be performed prior to anorectal manometry; however, real-world data is lacking.
Aims
Characterize real world rates of digital rectal and their sensitivity for detecting dyssynergia compared to anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test.
Methods
A retrospective single-center study was conducted to examine all patients who underwent anorectal manometry for chronic constipation between 2021 and 2022 at one tertiary center with motility expertise. Primary outcomes consisted of the rate of digital rectal exam prior to anorectal manometry; and secondary outcomes included the sensitivity of digital rectal exam for dyssynergic defecation.
Results
Only 42.3% of 142 patients had digital rectal examinations prior to anorectal manometry. Overall sensitivity for detecting dyssynergic defecation was 46.4%, but significantly higher for gastroenterology providers (p = .004), and highest for gastroenterology attendings (82.6%).
Conclusions
Digital rectal examination is infrequently performed when indicated for chronic constipation. Sensitivity for detecting dyssynergic defecation may be impacted by discipline and level of training.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tanner S, Chaudhry A, Goraya N et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of dyssynergic defecation and slow transit constipation in patients with chronic constipation. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092027.
Videlock EJ, Lembo A, Cremonini F. Diagnostic testing for dyssynergic defecation in chronic constipation: meta-analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:509-e370. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12096.
Black CJ, Ford AC. Chronic idiopathic constipation in adults: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Med J Aust. 2018;209:86–91. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja18.00241.
Rao SSC, Ahuja NK, Bharucha AE et al. Optimizing the utility of anorectal manometry for diagnosis and therapy a roundtable review and recommendations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.025.
Dekker L, van Reijn-Baggen DA, Han-Geurts IJM, Felt-Bersma RJF. To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04304-6.
Liu J, Lv C, Huang Y et al. Digital rectal examination is a valuable bedside tool for detecting dyssynergic defecation: A diagnostic study and a meta-Analysis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5685610.
Mahoro G, Jarava D, Desai N, Corning B, Copland A, Frye J. Golden-Finger: digital rectal exam predicts dyssynergic defecation but not type of dyssynergy pattern on ARM. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:S294. https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000591548.13628.98.
Soh JS, Lee HJ, Jung KW et al. The diagnostic value of a digital rectal examination compared with high resolution anorectal manometry in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1197. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.153.
Tantiphlachiva K, Rao P, Attaluri A, Rao SSC. Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:955–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.06.031.
Jain M. Digital rectal examination—A reliable screening tool for dyssynergic defecation. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018;37:176–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-018-0846-9.
Guo XF, Ke MY, Wang ZF, Fang XC, Wu B, Tu YP. Categorization of dysmotility in patients with chronic constipation and its significance for management. Chin J Dig Dis. 2004;5:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-9573.2004.00166.x.
Wong RK, Drossman DA, Bharucha AE et al. The Digital rectal examination: a multicenter survey of physicians’ and students’ perceptions and practice patterns. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.23.
Rao SSC, Meduri K. What is necessary to diagnose constipation? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2010.11.001.
Serra J, Pohl D, Azpiroz F et al. European society of neurogastroenterology and motility guidelines on functional constipation in adults. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32:e13762. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13762.
Jagielski CH, Naftaly JP, Riehl ME. Providing trauma informed care ruring anorectal evaluation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023;25:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00879-4.
Rao SSC. Rectal Eexam: Yes, it can and should be done in a busy practice. Official Journal of the American College of Gastroenterology 2018;113:635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0006-y.
Carrington EV, Heinrich H, Knowles CH et al. The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32:e13679. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13679.
Vélez C, Casimiro I, Pitts R, Streed CJ, Paul S. Digestive health in sexual and gender minority populations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117:865. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001804.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JAM: conception, data collection, statistical planning and analysis, original draft, provided final draft approval. RS: data collection, statistical analysis, original draft, provided final draft approval. YI, ER and AZ: data collection, draft editing, provided final draft approval. PS, KC, JS, MSS and DJ: conception, draft editing, provided final draft approval. YL: conception, statistical planning and analysis, original draft, provided final draft approval.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
An invited commentary on this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/10.1007/s10620-023-08234-3
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Menand, J.A., Sandhu, R., Israel, Y. et al. Digital Rectal Exams Are Infrequently Performed Prior to Anorectal Manometry. Dig Dis Sci 69, 728–731 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-08243-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-08243-2