Introduction

Despite effective therapies to induce and maintain remission, many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience new or persistent gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) like symptoms of recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms in IBD in remission was 32.5% (95% CI 27.4–37.9) [1]. Even when endoscopic or histologic remission was used to define remission, 25.8% (95% CI 20.2–31.7) experienced IBS-like symptoms, highlighting an unmet need in management beyond controlling active inflammation [1]. These symptoms are associated with high morbidity, poor quality of life, and increased healthcare utilization [2]. The clinical approach to persistent GI symptoms in this population can be challenging given the numerous possible underlying organic causes as well as the vast array of diagnostic options. In this review, we discuss conditions outside of active inflammation that can co-exist with IBD and explain persistent GI symptoms. We summarize the definition, pathophysiology, clinical signs and symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of IBS mimickers in IBD. In the review, we assume that active IBD-related inflammation has been ruled out based on the most recent guidelines. This review does not encompass an exhaustive list but covers common conditions that can overlap between motility and IBD specialties (Table 1).

Table 1 Causes of irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease
Full size table

Intestinal Microbial Overgrowth

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a condition where excessive amounts of bacteria typically found in the colon are found in the small intestine and result in various gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms [3]. Patient with IBD, particularly Crohn’s disease, are at increased risk of SIBO [4,5,6]. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, the proportion of SIBO in patients with IBD was 22.3% (95% CI 19.92–24.68). The odds ratio (OR) for SIBO in patients with IBD was 9.51 (95% CI 3.39–26.68) compared to controls without IBD [7]. The OR was significantly elevated in both CD (OR 10.86; 95% CI 2.76–42.69) and UC (OR 7.96; 95% CI 1.66–38.35). In subgroup analysis, patients with fibrostenosing CD (OR 7.47; 95% CI 2.51–22.20) and prior bowel surgery (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.65–3.44), had increased odds of SIBO. The underlying pathophysiology behind SIBO in IBD may be due to impaired intestinal mucosal integrity, intestinal stasis caused by strictures, and/or intra-abdominal adhesions and prior intestinal surgeries. Additionally, any structural factor that allows colonic bacteria to enter the small bowel, such as enterocolic fistulas or lack of an ileocecal valve can facilitate SIBO. The symptoms of SIBO are non-specific and non-predictive for SIBO, however commonly patients complain of bloating, abdominal pain, flatulence, nausea, dyspepsia, diarrhea, and constipation. The preferred method to diagnose SIBO is the lactulose or glucose breath test (Table 1) [8]. The test is considered positive if there is a rise in baseline breath hydrogen by ≥ 20 by 90 min. Small bowel aspiration with quantitative cultures during upper endoscopy can be considered, however this method is limited by the risk of contamination by oral flora and the invasive and costly nature of the test [9]. The cornerstone of therapy for SIBO is antibiotics [3]. In a study evaluating patients with IBD and SIBO (n = 117), 57.3% achieved symptomatic improvement after antibiotics. The rate of response was similar between CD and UC (52.1% vs 65.9%, p = 0.18) [10]. An alternative to antibiotics is a 2 to 3 week course of elemental diet, which contains predigested micronutrients that are primarily absorbed in the proximal small bowel and limits nutrients to bacteria in the small intestine [11]. While this has not been directly studied for SIBO in patients with IBD, the elemental diet has been shown to normalize abnormal lactulose breath test and improve symptoms in patients with IBS with a cumulative symptom response rate of 85% (79/93 patients). Unfortunately, this diet is limited by lack of palatability and hence patient adherence. To successfully eradicate SIBO in IBD patients, it is important to address underlying issues that may be predisposing to bacterial overgrowth, such as strictures causing intestinal stasis or post-surgical adhesions. In patients who are prone to SIBO recurrences, the clinician can consider utilizing pro-motility agents such as low dose erythromycin or prucalopride, to augment the phase 3 migrating motor complexes to sweep intestinal debris and extend periods between symptomatic SIBO recurrences [12, 13].

Intestinal Methanogen Overgrowth

Intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO) is a condition where methanogenic archaea have overgrown and result in GI symptoms. Since IMO is attributed to anaerobic organisms from the domain archaea, rather than bacteria, it is a separate clinical entity from SIBO [3]. IMO is overall uncommon in IBD and a systematic review and meta-analysis reported a low prevalence of 5.6% (95% CI 2.6–11.8) compared to 25% (95% CI 18.8–32.4) in patients with IBS [14]. The prevalence of IMO was significant lower in CD compared to UC (5.3%; 95% CI 3.0–8.5 vs 20.2%; 95% CI 12.8–29.4). Since intestinal methane gas directly slows intestinal transit, IMO can be associated with constipation and constipation predominant IBS [15]. IMO can only be diagnosed by a lactulose or glucose hydrogen breath test. Per the North American Consensus, a methane level of 10 ppm or more at any point during breath testing is considered diagnostic for IMO [8]. Another efficient method to detect IMO is a single fasting methane breath test. A SMM of ≥ 10 ppm had a sensitivity of 86.4% and specificity of 100% for diagnosing IMO on the glucose and lactulose breath test [16]. In terms of treatment, archaea are more resistant to most antibiotics and respond better to combination therapy (e.g., rifaximin and neomycin rather than neomycin alone).[17, 18] Alternative antibiotics that can be used to treat IMO include rifaximin and metronidazole or ciprofloxacin and metronidazole.

Small Intestinal Fungal Overgrowth

Small intestinal fungal overgrowth is characterized by excessive number of fungal organisms in the small bowel associated with gastrointestinal symptoms [19]. Fungus, mainly Candida species, is a natural inhabitant of the gut in healthy subjects and are usually found at low concentrations in jejunal aspirates [20]. While the prevalence of SIFO in IBD has not been established, patients with intestinal mucosal barrier injury, immunocompromised state, post-colectomy state and steroid or antibiotics use are at increased risk, therefore this condition is relevant for patients with IBD [19, 21]. Candida species, particularly Candida albicans (C. albicans) is significantly more abundant in CD, UC, and general patients with IBD compared to healthy controls [22, 23]. Mice models using a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced model of colitis showed that inflammation is a driver of C. albicans intestinal overgrowth [24]. The exact pathogenesis of SIFO in IBD is not clear, however host deficiency of fungus related factors Dectin-1 or CARD9 results in enhanced susceptibility to pathogenic fungal infections in humans and mice and susceptibility to colitis in mice [25,26,27,28]. Interestingly, polymorphic variants in the gene for CARD9 are strongly associated with CD and UC in humans, which suggests a link between fungi and IBD [25, 29, 30]. The most common symptoms of SIFO include abdominal discomfort, gas, bloating, flatulence, and diarrhea [19]. SIFO can be diagnosed by fluid aspiration of the 3rd or 4th portion of the duodenum or jejunum for quantitative cultures. Fungal cultures ≥ 103 colony forming units (CFU)/mL is diagnostic of SIFO [19, 31]. Candida identified in stool is usually considered clinically insignificant as Candida is common in stool cultures of asymptomatic individuals [32]. Treatment options for SIFO include nystatin or fluconazole. In an immunocompetent host, a 2–3 weeks course of oral fluconazole 100 to 200 mg daily is recommended [19]. Oral liquid nystatin is another safe option that can be considered. While data on its efficacy for SIFO is lacking, oral liquid nystatin is not systemically absorbed in the GI tract, therefore toxicity is rare. The dose and ideal treatment duration of nystatin for SIFO therapy is not established. In our clinical practice, we use Nystatin oral liquid 1,000,000 units four times daily for 21 days.

Post-fecal Microbiota Transplantation IBS

Patients with IBD are at increased risk for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and in cases of recurrent CDI, may undergo fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). While FMT may lead to resolution of recurrent CDI, some patients continue to report ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms. The risk factor for post-FMT IBS-like symptoms are not clear. In a prospective pilot study, there was a trend toward increased post-infectious IBS symptoms (abdominal discomfort, bloating, loose stools, constipation) among FMT recipients who received stool from donors with a positive lactulose breath test (50% vs 14.2%, p = 0.09). Larger studies are needed to assess the incidence of post-FMT IBS-like symptoms in patients with IBD and potential risk factors [33].

Malabsorptive Syndromes

Bile Acid Malabsorption

Patients with ileal CD or ileal resection are at increased risk for bile acid malabsorption (BAM) because the terminal ileum is the major site of bile acid reabsorption [34]. When a short ileal resection < 100 cm in performed, increased hepatic synthesis of bile acids (BA) minimizes the effect on bile acid metabolism and patients may develop watery diarrhea. An ileal resection greater than 100 cm can result in severe bile acid malabsorption and steatorrhea. Excess BAs can cause GI symptoms because they enhance mucosal permeability, induce water and electrolyte secretion and accelerate colonic transit. Common symptoms of bile acid malabsorption include watery diarrhea, steatorrhea, urgency, and abdominal cramping. Importantly, SIBO is a common cause of BAM because deconjugation of bile acids is mediated by bile salt hydrolase enzymes, which are widely expressed by the gut microbiota. Since patients with IBD are at higher risk for SIBO, SIBO should be ruled out in cases where BAM is suspected [35]. While diagnostic testing for BAM exists, symptomatic response to bile acid sequestrants is the preferred method to confirm a diagnosis. The 75Selenium homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption, but it is expensive and is not available in most countries including the United States [36]. The 75SeHCAT test uses noninvasive gamma scintigraphy to measure whole body bile acid retention after ingestion of a capsule containing 75SeHCAT. Subjects with decreased retention of radiolabeled BA have increased loss into the colon. Another diagnostic test is the 48 h total fecal BA excretion test, which is a direct measure of excess BAs that exit the colon. The test requires stool collection on the last 2 days of a 4 day, 100 g fat diet. Excretion of > 2,337 µmol per 48 h (ULN) is considered abnormal. The test is limited by the cumbersome stool collection and lack of widespread availability [34, 36]. A fasting serum C4 is a biomarker that provides a direct measure of hepatic BA synthesis. Relative to 75SeHCAT < 10%, a fasting serum C4 > 48.4 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 79% [37]. This test is available in the United States, convenient and a reasonable screening tool, however the test still requires further validation. Additionally, C4 levels have diurnal variation, with gradual rise after 9:00 AM so the test should be performed early in the morning. C4 levels can also be affected by the presence of liver disease and use of statins. Therapeutic trials of BA sequestrants (BAS) are used to confirm diagnosis and for treatment. These agents bind free BAs and prevent colonic effects of increased secretion and motility. Options include colestipol, colesevelam, and cholestyramine. BAS can affect absorption of other medications, therefore other oral medications should be administered at least 1 h before or 4 to 6 h after bile acid sequestrants are consumed. The use of these agents may be limited by side effects of nausea and bloating [34, 36].

Carbohydrate Maldigestion and Malabsorption

Carbohydrate (CHO) malabsorption is a condition where carbohydrates escape digestion and/or absorption and reach the colon causing bacterial fermentation and symptoms of diarrhea, bloating, abdominal cramping, and flatulence. Lactose intolerance is twice as frequent in UC and CD compared to healthy controls and patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders [38]. Fructose malabsorption is also more frequent in CD based on hydrogen test, unrelated to small intestinal transit, intestinal resection or SIBO [38]. Primary carbohydrate malabsorption includes rare congenital defects such as an autosomal recessive lactase deficiency, homozygous recessive sucrase-isomaltase deficiency, and sodium glucose co-transporter 1 (SGLT1) deficiency. Secondary forms arise from any condition where the structural integrity of the small intestine is impaired, i.e., IBD, celiac disease, radiation therapy, SIBO, enteric infections, extensive intestinal resection, or pancreatic dysfunction. Testing options include hydrogen breath testing, disaccharidase assay, and genetic testing. Hydrogen breath testing is a non-invasive and affordable method to diagnose carbohydrate intolerance. ≥ 20 parts per million increase in hydrogen from baseline is considered indicative of impaired absorption of the ingested sugar [8, 39]. The presence of SIBO can result in false positive breath testing for carbohydrate malabsorption and IMO can result in false negative testing because hydrogen is metabolized to form methane gas, therefore it is important to exclude SIBO and IMO prior to diagnosing patients with carbohydrate malabsorption. Disaccharidase testing is limited by the invasive nature of the test, potential sampling error and analysis can be affected by improper specimen handling and storage [39]. The mainstays of management includes disaccharide dietary restriction and/or enzyme replacement.

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency

Pancreatic disorders are not uncommon in IBD [40]. Patients with IBD can develop acute pancreatitis from gallstones or medications, there is a strong association between Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis and UC and there is an increased prevalence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in IBD. The reported prevalence of EPI may be overestimated as diarrhea can lead to falsely low fecal elastase due to dilution effect [41]. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) refers to maldigestion and malabsorption of nutrients as a consequence of reduced pancreatic enzyme output. Data regarding EPI in IBD is scarce and conflicting. In a cross-sectional study, EPI was demonstrated in patients with IBD based on fecal elastase test using a cut off of ≤ 200 μg/g. EPI was found in 22% of UC and 14% of CD patients and OR for patients with IBD was 10.5 (95%CI 2.5–44.8) compared to controls, based on screening by fecal elastase [41]. The proposed pathophysiology for EPI in IBD includes pancreatic autoantibodies, duodenal involvement resulting in ampullary obstruction, duodenal reflux, and extensive small bowel resection leading to reduced hormone secretion [42, 43]. Common symptoms of EPI include abdominal bloating, chronic diarrhea, steatorrhea, and chronic abdominal pain. Steatorrhea is characteristic of severe pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and typically occurs when 90 percent of glandular function has been lost. To evaluate for steatorrhea, a coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) is the considered gold standard. The patient should maintain a strict diet containing 100 g of fat per day over 5 days, then collect feces in the last 3 days of the 5 days period. A CFA < 93% is considered pathological [44]. The initial evaluation for EPI includes a fecal elastase level and nutritional laboratory markers including fat soluble vitamins, proteins, and micronutrients. An IgG4 level can also be obtained if there is concern for autoimmune pancreatitis. The presence of symptoms of malabsorption, nutritional deficiencies, and a low fecal elastase makes the diagnosis of EPI very likely [45]. The pretest probability of EPI is very high in patients with chronic calcifying pancreatitis on imaging [44]. The mainstay of management is a trial of exogenous pancreatic enzymes.

Immune Mediated Syndromes

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGID) are chronic, inflammatory conditions characterized by GI symptoms and increase in eosinophil predominant inflammation in the GI tract, in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia [46]. The best known EGID is eosinophilic esophagitis (EOE), but non-EoE EGIDs can involve the stomach, small bowel, and/or colon. Non-EOE EGIDs are rare and affect less than 10 in 10,000 people [47]. In IBD, eosinophils (eos) typically represent a small percentage of infiltrating leukocytes [48]. Patients with IBD and IBS-D harbor significantly increased mucosal eosinophils and appear to respond to a hypoallergenic diet and budesonide therapy [49]. EGID is characterized by increased mucosal eosinophils, distributed in sheets that can involve the mucosa, muscle layer or serosa. Patient presentation ranges from vague abdominal symptoms to serious complications including mucosal ulceration, intestinal obstruction, pyloric stenosis, strictures, protein losing enteropathy, bowel perforation, anemia, and ascites. EGID limited to the mucosa can lead to diarrhea, abdominal pain and signs of malabsorption or protein losing enteropathy. The muscular form is characterized by intestinal strictures with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting due to intestinal obstruction. The serosal form can present with an eosinophilic rich ascites and peritonitis [50]. Other clinical features include peripheral eosinophilia, which is present in over 70% of patients with eosinophilic enteritis and during flares. IgE levels can also be elevated in more than 50% of patients with EGID. There are no clear guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of non-EoE EGIDs. In general, ≥ 30 eos in ≥ 5 high power field (hpf) is considered positive for gastric biopsies and ≥ 30 eos in 3 hpf is considered positive for duodenal biopsy. A minimum of 12 biopsies should be collected per subject during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 4 in each the gastric antrum, gastric body and duodenum [51]. Eosinophilia secondary to more common conditions such as parasitic infections, food hypersensitivies, drug reactions, and malignancies must be excluded. Imaging should be obtained if there are obstructive symptoms or peritoneal signs or suspicion of ascites. Treatment is based on evidence from case reports and small case series. First line therapy includes empirical food elimination diets and systemic glucocorticoids. Most case series report good efficacy with corticosteroids, with clinical remission obtain in 50–90% of patients with eosinophilic enteritis. Treatment should be started at 0.5 to 1 mg/kg for a few weeks followed by a tapering dose over a 6–8 week period [52]. For those who become corticosteroid dependent, budesonide or azathioprine can be used. Relapsing or refractory disease may respond to immunosuppressive agents and biologic agents. Potential role of monoclonal antibodies (e.g., dupilumab) is the subject of active research in IBD-IBS overlap.

Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Mast cell activation disorders include a spectrum of conditions including cutaneous or systemic mastocytosis, associated with clonal expansion of mast cells (MC) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), a non-clonal condition defined by episodic and/or chronic symptoms of MC activation with elevation of MC mediators [53]. Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a common but underrecognized cause of GI symptoms and can be mistaken as functional GI disorders. The prevalence of MCAS in IBD is unknown and there is limited data on the role for mast cells in IBD [54]. In one study, there was no significant difference in the number of intra-mucosal mast cells (MCs) in the colon among IBS, IBD, and normal control groups [55]. Gelbmann et al. described accumulation of mast cells in strictures of patients with CD, suggesting a role in fibrosis [56]. Nevertheless, MCAS is a common and underrecognized cause of GI symptoms that may overlap with IBD. The defining symptom characteristics of MCAS include involvement of the skin, airway, and GI tract. Common skin manifestations include flushing, hives, and pruritis. Airway or nasal passageway symptoms include throat scratching, chest tightness, and rhinitis. Common GI manifestations include nausea, heartburn, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, and altered bowel movements [57]. When MCs are located within the muscular layer of the GI tract, they can lead to symptoms of GI dysmotility such as constipation [58]. MCAS should be considered in patients who are not responding to conventional IBS therapies who also have a personal history or family history of atopy including allergic rhinitis, asthma, and eczema. MCAS is associated with other syndromes including hypermobile EDS and POTS [59, 60]. Diagnosis for MCAS include the major criteria of characteristic MC activation symptoms in 2 or more systems plus one or more minor criteria. Minor criteria include (1) elevation in blood and/or urine tests relatively specific to MC, (2) clinical improvement with MC-directed medical therapy, and (3) ≥ 20 MCs per HPF in extracutaneous tissue (luminal GI tract or bladder biopsies) [57]. Initial diagnostic testing includes serum tryptase and chromogranin A, plasma prostaglandin D2 and histamine and urine testing with 24 h and/or random urine N-methylhistamine, leukotriene E4 and 2,3-dinor-11-beta-prostaglandin-F2-alpha. In general, testing within 1–6 h of an acute MC activation attack and prior to initiation of MCAS therapy is helpful. Negative serologies do not exclude a diagnosis and serum tryptase is only elevated in 15% of patients with MCAS [61, 62]. When serum tryptase is > 20 ng/mL, work-up for systemic mastocytosis is indicated. Treatment involves trigger avoidance (i.e., stress, heat, and alcohol), dietary interventions with low histamine and gluten free diet and medications to control MC mediator production and action [57]. First line pharmacologic agents include non-sedating H1 histamine receptor antagonist and H2 histamine receptor antagonist once to twice per day. If this only provides partial relief, second line pharmacologic therapy includes montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist twice daily and/or oral cromolyn sodium, an MC stabilizer. Cromolyn sodium can be introduced earlier for patients with severe GI symptoms. The starting dose is 100 mg four times taking and should be taken 30 min before meals and at bedtime. Third line therapy includes ketotifen, a second generation H1 antagonists with anti-inflammatory effects. This can be found at compounding pharmacies and usual dosing is 1–4 mg BID. A multidisciplinary approach including an allergist and hematologist may be required in optimal management of patients with MCAS.

Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity

Nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is a condition where gluten ingestion leads to intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms. The reported prevalence of NCGS and wheat sensitivity ranges between 0.49 and 14.9% [63]. The pathophysiology of NCGS is not fully understood, however NCGS seems to be triggered by activation of the innate immune system rather than the adaptive immune system. Markers such as toll-like receptor 2 have been shown to be increased, which is consistent with innate immunity, whereas makers of adaptive immunity such as interleukin-6 and interleukin-21 are not expressed at high levels [64] . Unlike Celiac disease, NCGS is not associated with small bowel enteropathy or abnormal celiac serologies [65]. Symptoms include abdominal pain, bloating, irregular bowel movements, fatigue, joint pain, migraines, and brain fog. The gold standard diagnosis is a placebo controlled crossover challenge, which has been used in clinical trials, but is impractical in clinical settings [66]. In general, clinical symptoms with a gluten containing diet in the absence of serologic or histologic findings of Celiac disease or wheat allergy are suggestive of NCGS. Despite not having Celiac disease or a wheat allergy, patients with NCGS improve symptomatically with a gluten free diet.

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Hypermobile Ehlers Danlos syndrome (hEDS) is a multi-system and heritable disorder of connective tissue characterized by joint hypermobility, GI symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, chronic pain syndromes, and structural abnormalities such as visceroptosis and pelvic organ prolapse and urinary dysfunction [67]. In one cohort, joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS)/hEDS was present in 32% of patients with CD (8 of 25) compared to 21% of patients with UC (8 of 38) [68]. Another study found that joint hypermobility, using the Beighton score, is observed more frequently in CD (n = 37, 70.7%) compared to patients with UC (n = 10, 35.7%), (P = 0.0063) and healthy controls (n = 17, 25.4%) (P < 0.001) [69]. In a retrospective review of patients with EDS, of which 71% had JHS, 55% complained of GI symptoms with the most common symptoms being abdominal pain (56%), nausea (44%), constipation (42%), heartburn (38%), IBS-like symptoms (30%), vomiting (25%), and diarrhea (23%) [70]. The increased connective tissue laxity and weakness also results in multiple structural abnormalities including hiatal hernia, visceroptosis, pelvic organ prolapse, and colon redundancy [71]. The diagnosis of hEDS is made clinically and there is no genetic etiology to test for. A detailed criteria has been outlined for hEDS diagnosis and includes presence of (1) generalized joint hypermobility, (2) systemic manifestations or a generalized connective tissue disorder, and (3) exclusion of unusual skin fragility, other heritable and acquired connective tissue disorders and alternative diagnosis that include joint hypermobility [72]. Generalized joint hypermobility can be determined by a Beighton score of ≥ 5 points out of 9 for pubertal men and women up to age 50 and ≥ 4 for those > 50 years of age (Table 1). hEDS can be challenging to manage and should involve a multidisciplinary approach. For GI manifestations, patients with defecatory complaints should be referred for anorectal physiological assessment and considered for biofeedback and/or pelvic floor therapy. Promotility agents can be helpful in patients with hEDS with GI dysmotility.

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a disorder of the autonomic nervous system characterized by orthostatic intolerance. POTS is more frequent in women (female:male ratio 4.5:1) and most cases occur between ages 15 and 25 [73]. POTS can often overlap with EDS and MCAS [74]. The prevalence of POTS in IBD is unknown. The pathophysiology of POTS is multifactorial and includes, impaired sympathetic vasoconstriction, hyperadrenergic states, hypovolemia, and physical deconditioning [73]. In adults, the condition is defined as an elevation of the heart rate of at least 30 beats per minute (bpm) within 10 min after standing upright, or a heart rate ≥ 120 bpm after standing in the absence of orthostatic hypotension [75]. In addition to orthostatic tachycardia, patients may display symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion (lightheadedness, blurred vision, cognitive difficulties, weakness) and sympathetic hyperactivity (palpitations, chest pain, and tremulousness). Independent of EDS, POTS is associated with GI symptoms due to dysmotility of the stomach, small bowel, and colon [76, 77]. Common GI symptoms include, nausea, bloating, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain [78]. Additionally, patients with POTS and GI symptoms can have abnormal, either rapid or slow gastric emptying, on scintigraphic evaluation [76]. The evaluation and management of POTS should be multidisciplinary. The basic evaluation should include cardiac evaluation to exclude other causes of inappropriate sinus tachycardia, autonomic reflex testing (i.e., tilt table test) and measurement of supine and standing plasma catecholamine levels. Management includes avoidance of exacerbating factors (i.e., heat exposure, physical exertion, heavy meals, prolonged recumbency, medications (diuretics, vasodilators, sympathomimetics), maintenance of intravascular volume with increased water and sodium intake, physical reconditioning and pharmacotherapy (fludrocortisone, midodrine, beta blockers, and/or pyridostigmine). The added benefit of pyridostigmine is that it may potentiate muscarinic receptor activation in the GI tract and has promotility features that may improve gastric emptying and constipation symptoms. Additionally, as a cholinesterase inhibitor, it may potentiate vagal effects.

Intra-abdominal Adhesions

Intra-abdominal adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue that form between loops of bowel and adjacent structures [79]. They form primarily after abdominal surgery but can also form as a result of endometriosis, inflammation or radiation therapy. While the majority of post-operative adhesions are asymptomatic, symptomatic adhesions can present with chronic bloating, abdominal cramping, altered bowel habits, chronic abdominal pain, and nausea. Other clinical features include bowel obstruction, SIBO, female infertility, and dyspareunia. Intra-abdominal adhesions are relevant to patients with IBD because the surgeries that carry the highest risk of adhesion related hospital readmissions are open total proctocolectomy (15.4%), total colectomy (8.8%), and ileostomy (10.6%) [80]. Additionally, Crohn’s disease, proctocolectomy, total colectomy, ileostomy, age younger than 60 years old, procedures involving the small intestine, colon are all risk factors for adhesion formation. Outside of a bowel obstruction where a clear transition point can be identified, diagnosis using imaging is challenging. An X-ray barium study with small bowel follow through may be able to suggest adhesions when acute angulation(s) of the bowels are identified. When clinical suspicion for symptomatic adhesions is high, a laparoscopy can be both diagnostic and therapeutic. Non-invasive treatment options include manual physical therapy as this may be beneficial for both breaking apart adhesions and preventing adhesion formation [81]. Thus far, only in vivo studies on rats have shown manual therapy to attenuate formation of adhesions [82]. In a systematic review on effects of soft tissue mobilization on surgical and non-surgical abdominal adhesion related symptoms, all of the studies that used pain as an outcome reported decreased pain after treatment. There were also improvements seen in infertility as well [83]. Fiber supplementation, high fiber diets, and stimulant type anti-constipation agents should be avoided because they can worsen symptoms. A low residue diet is better tolerated in patients with symptomatic adhesions. Lastly, a trial of anti-spasmodic medications such as peppermint based products, dicyclomine or hyoscyamine may also be helpful [84].

Endometriosis

Endometriosis is an inflammatory disease characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue at extrauterine sites [85]. Endometriosis should be part of the differential diagnosis for abdominal pain in pre-menopausal women. In a systematic review, epidemiological studies found a positive association between endometriosis and IBD. The proportion of IBD in patients with endometriosis varied from 2 to 3.4%, compared to 0–1% of the control group [85]. A large nationwide Danish cohort study reported a 50% increase in the risk of IBD in women with endometriosis in comparison with women in the general population [86, 87]. In a nationwide Danish cohort study, women with surgically verified endometriosis had an increased risk of IBD overall, UC (standardized incidence ration (SIR) = 1.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.3) and CD (SIR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.5) [86]. The most common site of extragenital endometriosis are the GI and urinary tracts. GI endometriosis is found in 3.8 to 37% of endometriosis with most being found on the rectosigmoid, followed by the rectum, ileum, appendix and cecum [88, 89]. GI symptoms are 8 times more common in women with endometriosis compared to those without disease [90, 91]. Endometriosis may even present with IBD-like symptoms of chronic abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, fecal urgency, and rectal bleeding. Common gastrointestinal symptoms in endometriosis include chronic abdominal pain, constipation, bloating, flatulence, fecal urgency, painful defecation, and rectal bleeding. Other symptoms of endometriosis include dysmenorrhea, lower abdominal or pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, and infertility [92]. The abdominal and pelvic pain can be acyclical. In terms of diagnosis, there are no accurate biomarkers for endometriosis. Physical exam may demonstrate pain and tenderness on bimanual examination or on rectal examination. Imaging plays a key role in evaluation of endometriosis. If there is high clinical suspicion a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) can diagnose endometriosis with high specificity (92–100%) and sensitivity (71–98%) [92, 93]. TVUS is the first line imaging modality, however ultrasound is limited in detecting small (< 1 cm) or superficial peritoneal lesions and for assessing depth of infiltration. MRI pelvis with contrast is able to detect superficial peritoneal and deep infiltrating lesions. Laparoscopic surgical evaluation is the gold standard for detection and diagnosis of endometriosis. Treatment includes hormonal therapies, surgical removal of endometrial implants, and pain management [94].

Rectal Evacuation Disorders

Rectal evacuation disorders consist of both functional and structural disorders than can cause inability to evacuate stool from the rectum. Functional defecatory disorders are characterized by paradoxical contraction or inadequate relaxation of pelvic floor muscles (i.e., dyssynergic defecation) and/or inadequate propulsive force during attempted defecation [95]. Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is highly prevalent in patients with IBD and defecatory symptoms and is responsive to biofeedback therapy [96, 97]. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, DD in patients without IPAA (n = 182) ranged from 45 to 97% and in those with IPAA (n = 260) ranged from 24 to 75%. The prevalence of DD in patients with IPAA with and without pouchitis ranged from 17 to 67% and 29% to 50%, respectively. In terms of proposed pathophysiology, persistent defecatory symptoms are thought to be related to long-term neuromuscular sequelae of prolonged inflammation or surgical complications. Additionally, maladaptive behaviors to cope with painful and frequent defecation may contribute [98]. DD can present with a wide array of symptoms including constipation, alternating bowel habits, fecal incontinence, diarrhea, and rectal discomfort [96]. The evaluation for DD includes a digital rectal examination and anorectal manometry with balloon expulsion test. Unfortunately, there are no validated diagnostic criteria for DD in IBD. Rome IV has a suggested diagnostic criteria, however this requires patients to meet the diagnostic criteria for functional constipation and/or constipation predominant IBS, however DD in IBD presents with a wide array of symptoms aside from constipation. Additionally, data on what constitutes abnormal and normal values in IPAA on ARM and BET is lacking and altered post-surgical anatomy can make interpretation more challenging [98, 99]. Biofeedback is the first line therapy for DD and involves interactive retraining of the pelvic floor muscles and anal sphincters to restore a normal pattern of defecation. Despite the variability in the definition of DD used in IBD research, biofeedback has been shown to be effective in IBD [96, 97]. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, there was a good response rate to biofeedback in both IPAA and non-IPAA patients. The pooled response rate to biofeedback therapy in patients without IPAA was 70% (95% CI, 55–84%; I2 = 95%; P < 0.01), and was 86% (95% CI, 67–98%; I2 = 61%; P = 0.05) in those with IPAA [97]. Additionally, biofeedback has been shown to improve quality of life and reduced GI-related health care resource utilization [96]. While DD is prevalent in IBD, it is important to recognize that structural issues can also explain persistent defecatory symptoms. Examples of structural rectal evacuation disorders include enterocele, rectocele, rectal prolapse, pelvic organ prolapse, intussusception, and strictures. These issues can be identified by MR or XR defecography, which provide a dynamic assessment of defecatory function. Depending on the severity of these abnormalities, the patient may benefit from biofeedback or need evaluation with colorectal surgeon and/or urogynecology. Defecography is also a useful diagnostic test for evaluating functional defecatory disorders of the pouch and can provide valuable information regarding pouch emptying dynamics and also assess for underlying structural abnormalities [100].

Conclusion

Patients with IBD in apparent clinical remission who present with IBS-like symptoms pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Persistent GI symptoms can be attributed to a wide range of etiologies including overlapping gastrointestinal conditions or other systemic syndromes with GI manifestations. Several overlapping etiologies can also co-exist at the same time, such as SIBO and SIFO, BAM and SIBO with EDS, POTS and MCAS. After ruling out inflammation and infectious etiologies (Fig. 1), medication and/or supplement related side effects and adverse drug reactions should be explored (Table 1). For example, some patients with UC receiving 5 amino salicylic acid (5-ASA) containing therapies can develop an acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome characterized by fever, diarrhea, and abdominal pain [101]. A detailed history and physical examination, can guide evaluation, minimize unnecessary or redundant testing and prevent delays in diagnosis (Fig. 1). The differential diagnosis can be narrowed down based on key elements of the patient history, particularly the predominant symptom pattern: diarrhea, constipation, and/or abdominal pain (Fig. 2), associated clinical signs and symptoms and predisposing conditions. Despite the high prevalence of patients with IBD and with persistent unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms, evidence for the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of motility disorders and other overlapping gastrointestinal and systemic conditions in this population is critically lacking. Further studies are needed to address the current gaps in knowledge.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Initial evaluation of IBS-like symptoms in quiescent IBD

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2figure 2

a Differential diagnosis and clinical clues for diarrhea predominant symptoms in quiescent IBD. b. Differential diagnosis and clinical clues for constipation predominant symptoms in quiescent IBD. c. Differential diagnosis and clinical clues for abdominal pain in quiescent IBD.CD Crohn’s disease; UC ulcerative colitis; SIBO small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; SIFO small intestinal fungal overgrowth; MCAS mast cell activation syndrome; EGID eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders; POTS postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; hEDS hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; cm centimeter; BMs bowel movements

Full size image