Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients with Non-pancreatic Digestive Conditions: A Nationwide Claims Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is most commonly used to treat exocrine insufficiency related to pancreatic diseases, but can be used for non-pancreatic digestive conditions (NPDC). We aimed to determine the prevalence of PERT use and describe prescription patterns in individuals with NPDC.

Methods

A nationally representative claims database of 48.6 million enrollees was used to identify individuals who received PERT prescription(s) in the absence of any pancreas-related diagnosis. Data on demographics, enrolment, comorbidities, exocrine function testing, treatment and potential indications for PERT were retrieved, and compared with individuals who received PERT for primary diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP).

Results

A total of 29,234 individuals (64.1% female, mean age 52.4 ± 16.5 years) received PERT for NPDC. The overall estimated US population prevalence rate for PERT use for NDPC was 60.2/100,000 persons. Rates increased significantly with age and were higher in women in all age groups except 1–20 years old. When compared with CP, individuals with NPDC receiving PERT were more likely to be older (52.4 vs. 50.1 years), female (64.1% vs. 51.0%), have lower prevalence of alcoholism (3.6% vs. 25.0%), tobacco abuse (8.4% vs. 30.1%), and received PERT for shorter mean duration (5.3 vs. 8.2 months) (all p < 0.001). Median dose of PERT in individuals with NPDC was 2880 lipase units/day.

Conclusions

Although proportionally low, a sizable population receives PERT for NPDC. PERT for NPDC is usually prescribed at a low dose and for shorter duration, suggesting it is used mostly as a trial for or until resolution of symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from IQVIA Legacy PharMetrics. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the corresponding author with permission of IQVIA.

Abbreviations

AP:

Acute pancreatitis

CI:

Confidence interval

CP:

Chronic pancreatitis

EPI:

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

ICD:

International classification of diseases

IQR:

Inter-quartile range

NPDC:

Non-pancreatic digestive conditions

PERT:

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Struyvenberg MR, Martin CR, Freedman SD. Practical guide to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency - Breaking the myths. BMC Med. 2017;15:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Greer JB, Greer P, Sandhu BS et al. Nutrition and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Chronic Pancreatitis Patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34:387–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joker-Jensen H, Mathiasen AS, Kohler M, Rasmussen HH, Drewes AM, Olesen SS. Micronutrient deficits in patients with chronic pancreatitis: prevalence, risk factors and pitfalls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32:1328–1334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brien SJ, Omer E. Chronic Pancreatitis and Nutrition Therapy. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34:S13–S26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh VK, Schwarzenberg SJ. Pancreatic insufficiency in Cystic Fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2017;16:S70–S78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilliland TM, Villafane-Ferriol N, Shah KP, et al. Nutritional and Metabolic Derangements in Pancreatic Cancer and Pancreatic Resection. Nutrients. 2017;9(3).

  7. Hallac A, Aleassa EM, Rogers M, Falk GA, Morris-Stiff G. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in distal pancreatectomy: incidence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22:275–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollemans RA, Hallensleben NDL, Mager DJ et al. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following acute pancreatitis: Systematic review and study level meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2018;18:253–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh VK, Haupt ME, Geller DE, Hall JA, Quintana Diez PM. Less common etiologies of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:7059–7076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nousia-Arvanitakis S, Fotoulaki M, Tendzidou K, Vassilaki C, Agguridaki C, Karamouzis M. Subclinical exocrine pancreatic dysfunction resulting from decreased cholecystokinin secretion in the presence of intestinal villous atrophy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:307–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DiMagno EP, Go WL, Summerskill WH. Impaired cholecystokinin-pancreozymin secretion, intraluminal dilution, and maldigestion of fat in sprue. Gastroenterology. 1972;63:25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rominger JM, Chey WY, Chang TM. Plasma secretin concentrations and gastric pH in healthy subjects and patients with digestive diseases. Dig Dis Sci. 1981;26:591–597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kovacs M, Lakatos PL, Papp M et al. Pancreatic autoantibodies and autoantibodies against goblet cells in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:429–435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friess H, Bohm J, Muller MW et al. Maldigestion after total gastrectomy is associated with pancreatic insufficiency. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:341–347.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Armbrecht U, Lundell L, Stockbruegger RW. Nutrient malassimilation after total gastrectomy and possible intervention. Digestion. 1987;37:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Borbely Y, Plebani A, Kroll D, Ghisla S, Nett PC. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:790–794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huddy JR, Macharg FM, Lawn AM, Preston SR. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:594–597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Evans KE, Leeds JS, Morley S, Sanders DS. Pancreatic insufficiency in adult celiac disease: do patients require long-term enzyme supplementation? Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:2999–3004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leeds JS, Hopper AD, Hurlstone DP et al. Is exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in adult coeliac disease a cause of persisting symptoms? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:265–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Armbrecht U, Lundell L, Stockbrugger RW. The benefit of pancreatic enzyme substitution after total gastrectomy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1988;2:493–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bragelmann R, Armbrecht U, Rosemeyer D, Schneider B, Zilly W, Stockbrugger RW. The effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation in patients with steatorrhoea after total gastrectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:231–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang W, de la Iglesia-Garcia D, Baston-Rey I et al. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Following Acute Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:1985–2005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Forsmark CE, Tang G, Xu H, Tuft M, Hughes SJ, Yadav D. The use of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in the US is infrequent and inconsistent. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51:958–967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gardner TB, Munson JC, Morden NE. The FDA and prescription pancreatic enzyme product cost. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:624–625.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen ET, Martin CF, Kappelman MD, Dellon ES. Prevalence of Eosinophilic Gastritis, Gastroenteritis, and Colitis: Estimates From a National Administrative Database. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kappelman MD, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman K et al. The prevalence and geographic distribution of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1424–1429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dilokthornsakul P, Valuck RJ, Nair KV, Corboy JR, Allen RR, Campbell JD. Multiple sclerosis prevalence in the United States commercially insured population. Neurology. 2016;86:1014–1021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Simon TA, Boers M, Hochberg M et al. Comparative risk of malignancies and infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating abatacept versus other biologics: a multi-database real-world study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oka P, Parr H, Barberio B, Black CJ, Savarino EV, Ford AC. Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:908–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hongzhi Xu, PhD for assistance in data organization and programming.

Funding

Gatorade Foundation (CEF) Research reported in this study was supported by the Gatorade Research Trust (CEF, DY) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) under award numbers UO1DK108320 (CEF) and UO1DK108306 (DY). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AEP (Writing: original draft and editing), GT (Data curation, Formal analysis), XW (Data curation, Formal analysis), CEF (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing: review and editing), DY (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing: review and editing). All authors have approved the final version of the article. Dhiraj Yadav is guarantor of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiraj Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Preprint server

The manuscript is not included on any preprint server.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phillips, A.E., Tang, G., Wang, X. et al. Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients with Non-pancreatic Digestive Conditions: A Nationwide Claims Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 68, 1754–1761 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07750-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07750-y

Keywords

Navigation