Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ustekinumab Does Not Increase Risk of Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals and Background

Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL-12/IL-23 approved for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a meta-analysis to compare rates of adverse events (AEs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of UST for all indications.

Study

A systematic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases through November 2019. Study inclusion included RCTs comparing UST to placebo or other biologics in patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of an autoimmune condition.

Results

Thirty RCTs with 16,068 patients were included in our analysis. Nine thousand six hundred and twenty-six subjects were included in the UST vs placebo analysis. There was no significant difference in serious or mild/moderate AEs between UST and placebo with an OR of 0.83 (95% CI 0.66, 1.05) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.99, 1.18), respectively, over a median follow-up time of 16 weeks. In a sub-analysis of CD and UC trials, no difference in serious or mild/moderate AEs in UST versus placebo was seen.

Conclusions

UST was not associated with an increase in short-term risk of AEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Judson MA, Baughman RP, Costabel U, et al. Safety and efficacy of ustekinumab or golimumab in patients with chronic sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:1296–1307. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00000914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Igarashi A, Kato T, Kato M, Song M, Nakagawa H, Japanese Ustekinumab Study Group. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis: long-term results from a phase 2/3 clinical trial. J Dermatol. 2012;39:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01347.x.

  3. Gottlieb A, Menter A, Mendelsohn A, et al. Ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, for psoriatic arthritis: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2009;373:633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60140-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet Lond Engl. 2008;371:1665–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60725-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet Lond Engl. 2008;371:1675–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60726-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lebwohl M, Strober B, Menter A, et al. Phase 3 studies comparing brodalumab with ustekinumab in psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2013;382:780–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60594-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Segal BM, Constantinescu CS, Raychaudhuri A, et al. Repeated subcutaneous injections of IL12/23 p40 neutralising antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, dose-ranging study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:796–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70173-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, et al. Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:990–999. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Khattri S, Brunner PM, Garcet S, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, Gao L-L, et al. Ustekinumab induction and maintenance therapy in refractory Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1519–1528. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1203572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1946–1960. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Fedorak RN, et al. A randomized trial of Ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blauvelt A, Reich K, Tsai T-F, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to 1 year: results from the CLEAR study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:60–69.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.08.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths CEM, Strober BE, van de Kerkhof P, et al. Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gelfand JM, Shin DB, Alavi A, et al. A phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of the effects of ustekinumab on vascular inflammation in psoriasis (the VIP-U Trial). J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:85–93.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2019.07.679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Vollenhoven RF, Hahn BH, Tsokos GC, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a multicentre, double-blind, phase 2, randomised, controlled study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;392:1330–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32167-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1201–1214. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1900750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saeki H, Kabashima K, Tokura Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;392:650–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Sieper J, et al. Three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of Ustekinumab in axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2019;71:258–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smolen JS, Agarwal SK, Ilivanova E, et al. A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Paul C, Griffiths CEM, van de Kerkhof PCM, et al. Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared with ustekinumab over 52 weeks of treatment: results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:70–79.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bagel J, Nia J, Hashim PW, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (16-week clarity results). Dermatol Ther. 2018;8:571–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-018-0265-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke W-H, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;391:2213–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30952-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frucht DM, Holland SM. Defective monocyte costimulation for IFN-gamma production in familial disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection: abnormal IL-12 regulation. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 1996;157:411–416.

  27. Godinez I, Keestra AM, Spees A, Bäumler AJ. The IL-23 axis in Salmonella gastroenteritis. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01637.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Awoniyi M, Miller SI, Wilson CB, Hajjar AM, Smith KD. Homeostatic regulation of Salmonella-induced mucosal inflammation and injury by IL-23. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yan J, Smyth MJ, Teng MWL. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 and their conflicting roles in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a028530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schurich A, Raine C, Morris V, Ciurtin C. The role of IL-12/23 in T cell-related chronic inflammation: implications of immunodeficiency and therapeutic blockade. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (Updated on March 2011) 2011.

  32. Deepak P, Sandborn WJ. Ustekinumab and anti-interleukin-23 agents in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2017;46:603–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2017.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Macaluso FS, Maida M, Ventimiglia M, Cottone M, Orlando A. Effectiveness and safety of Ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn’s disease in real-life experiences: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2020.1707800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding source for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

David Hudesman was the consultant for Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen Biotech, Abbvie, and Salix. Research support was from Pfizer. Shannon Chang was the consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, and Oshi Health. Lisa Malter was the consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Abbvie, Prometheus, Janssen, Merck, UCB, and Gilead. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 533 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rolston, V.S., Kimmel, J., Popov, V. et al. Ustekinumab Does Not Increase Risk of Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dig Dis Sci 66, 1631–1638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06344-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06344-w

Keywords

Navigation